Channel
@libertenumerique
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
1,473subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001554421180 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @libertenumerique |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/libertenumerique |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:25 | 1,473 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:29 | 1,474 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:04 | 1,475 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:48 | 1,475 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 November 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
41 reactions across 15 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 27 | 65.9% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 9.76% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 9.76% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 4.88% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 2.44% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 2.44% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 2.44% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 2.44% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 41reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 October 2024 to 4 November 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
UX/UI Designer : les coulisses du métier avec Amélie Poirier (Niji) https://ift.tt/ZkfA2hv Suivez-nous sur t.me/LeBlogDuModerateur | @LeBlogDuModerateur
Signed Theudric
Pour celles et ceux voulant s'orienter. Toutes ces formations sont finançable par le biais du CPF
Signed Theudric
https://www.blogdumoderateur.com/selection-formation-cybersecurite-224/
🙏2
Signed Theudric
👩🏽💻 📰 Un pirate montre à Xavier Niel comment vraiment "foutre le bordel" chez Free https://ift.tt/OhnJtuz via @Zdnet_actu | ZDNet actualites Suivez-nous pour plus d'infos sur t.me/Zdnet_actu
❤1
Signed Theudric
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dvdHfKslWjM Dommage d'être obligé de poster un lien YouTube mais de moins en moins d'instances Invidious fonctionnent encore correctement, Piped n'est pas mieux.... Vidéo d'excellente qualité, comme très souvent venant d'Arte. A ne pas Manquer
👍7
Signed Theudric
Même si le format papier dans ce domaine a le désavantage d'être vite dépassé tant les logiciels et solutions proposées évoluent vite, ce livre a le mérite d'exister et écrit par quelqu'un spécialisé dans le domaine.
👍2
Signed Theudric
👩🏽💻 📰 Un "Guide pratique des logiciels libres" pour une logithèque idéale https://ift.tt/PFqv2fI via @Zdnet_actu | ZDNet actualites Suivez-nous pour plus d'infos sur t.me/Zdnet_actu
👍3❤1🤩1
Signed Theudric
❗️##MESSAGE IMPORTANT##❗️ Colinu va évoluer. Suite au sondage posté récemment, la majorité des personnes qui se sont données la peine de répondre, à peine 5% des abonnés, à voté pour le maintien de l'organisation actuelle avec plusieurs groupes. Mais vu la quantité de travail et le temps nécessaire que cela représente, nous allons modifier le fonctionnement. J'ai demandé aux bonnes âmes ayant un peu de temps à nous …
👍4🤔1🤝1
Si vous rencontrez des difficultés ou impossibilités à regarder des vidéos ou écouter des audios via les instances invidious, telle Clipious ou d'autres, telle Newpipe, 👉 Utilisez FreeTube Android, vous pouvez le télécharger sur Droid-ify https://apt.izzysoft.de/fdroid/index/apk/io.freetubeapp.freetube Leur Github https://github.com/MarmadileManteater/FreeTubeAndroid/releases Vérifier dans les paramètres (onglet gé…
👍2
Si vous n'avez pas encore quitté Google Chrome, il ne vous reste plis aucune excuse pour le faire.... https://t.me/zdnet_actu/7982
👍1
Lisez entièrement l'article, vous découvrirez qu'en plus de la morale du créateur de VLC, comment la NSA et la CIA veulent vraiment être maître de tout pour tout contrôler.
👎1
VideoLAN a refusé des dizaines de millions de dollars pour placer de la pub dans VLC - Numerama https://www.numerama.com/business/294426-videolan-a-refuse-des-dizaines-millions-de-dollars-pour-placer-des-contenus-publicitaires-dans-vlc.html
👍5👏4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @libertenumerique. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Nous aimerions avoir un maximum de votes à ce sondage. Sachant que nous allons créer un groupe d'échange avec des sujets, trouver vous toujours utile de conserver les différents canaux : Collectif Liberté Numérique, Commentaires et Echange ?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 October 2024 to 4 November 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 329,019 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Collectif Liberté Numérique 🗽” (@libertenumerique), 1,473 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/libertenumerique.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.