汇海盘口上天码无限收!!! 😀😀😃😃😃😄😃 抖音系列 ✅ 连信系列 ✅ 游戏系列✅ 付费小平台✅ 视频号自热✅ 凤楼 ✅ 口信系列 ✅ 色播系列✅ 色站系列✅ 【以上姿势无限吃 单价置顶 码子丝滑】 欢迎粉商 中介 来对接 跳槽带结算记录 数据图 +1+2 我一直在 认准 @libais 频道: t.me/libai86868686
Signed 李白

Channel
@libai86868686
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
279subscribers
+48 since we began measuring on 29 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003926824308 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @libai86868686 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 5 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 29 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/libai86868686 |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Oct 2026, 19:07 | 279 | +5 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 13:00 | 274 | +5 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 01:41 | 269 | +12 |
| 1 Oct 2026, 11:16 | 257 | +15 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 07:36 | 242 | +7 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 06:42 | 235 | +4 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 12:30 | 231 | no change |
| 29 Aug 2026, 12:15 | 231 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
35 reactions across 14 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 24 | 68.6% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 5.71% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 5.71% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 2.86% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 2.86% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 2.86% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 2.86% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 2.86% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 2.86% | |
| 🤮 | 1 | 2.86% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
汇海盘口上天码无限收!!! 😀😀😃😃😃😄😃 抖音系列 ✅ 连信系列 ✅ 游戏系列✅ 付费小平台✅ 视频号自热✅ 凤楼 ✅ 口信系列 ✅ 色播系列✅ 色站系列✅ 【以上姿势无限吃 单价置顶 码子丝滑】 欢迎粉商 中介 来对接 跳槽带结算记录 数据图 +1+2 我一直在 认准 @libais 频道: t.me/libai86868686
Signed 李白
七夕节,找个女朋友,要求是中介!联系我:@libais
❤1
Signed 李白
我说的是炒飞机群,不是需要炒群,炒群不要找我啦,谢谢
❤3💔1
Signed 李白
炒群,炒群
❤4💩1🤡1🤮1
Signed 李白
先生,人生海海,山山而川,不过尔尔。 困住你的从来都不是那座山,而是你心里的执念! 山海自有归期,风雨自会相逢, 万事终将如意! 终有一天回头看,轻舟已过万重山! 前路漫漫亦灿灿! 汇海盘口直收全渠道色粉上天码! 认准: @libais 假粉 杀 杀 杀!!!!!
🌚1
Signed 李白
来给我产值粉,送她! 汇海盘口直收全渠道色粉上天码! 认准: @libais
❤1
Signed 李白
先生,你说遇事不决,可问春风。若春风不语,即随本心!可我若本心坚定又怎会遇事不决呢?春风亦有春风愁,不劳春风为我忧。花有重开日,人无再少年。春风若有怜花意,可否许我 再 少 年! 汇海盘口直收全渠道色粉上天码! 认准: @libais
❤1
Signed 李白
报账,报账,报账
Signed 李白
坚持自己做的事情就可以了,时间会告诉你你的选择正确与否。你只管努力,剩下的交给天意! 汇海盘口直收全渠道色粉上天码! 认准: @libais
Signed 李白
Photo, posted without a caption
❤4🎉2👍2
Signed 李白
我以为只要很认真地做事,就可以打动一个人,后来才发现,我只打动了自己。 汇海盘口直收全渠道色粉上天码! 认准: @libais
❤2😁1
Signed 李白
汇海盘口上天码无限收!!! 😀😀😃😃😃😄😃 抖音系列 ✅ 连信系列 ✅ 游戏系列✅ 付费小平台✅ 视频号自热✅ 凤楼 ✅ 口信系列 ✅ 色播系列✅ 色站系列✅ 【以上姿势无限吃 单价置顶 码子丝滑】 欢迎粉商 中介 来对接 跳槽带结算记录 数据图 +1+2 我一直在 认准 @libais 频道: t.me/libai86868686
Signed 李白
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @libai86868686. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“汇海-盘口直收色粉上天马” (@libai86868686), 279 subscribers as measured 25 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/libai86868686.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.