Channel
@lianshansheqv
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,652subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 4 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003593729533 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lianshansheqv |
| Description | 【亚洲女】： @sucaidg 【欧洲女】： @sucai3sk 【日本女】： @sucai5sp 【私密照】： @taotu_c18w 💦抖音快手网红吃瓜🍉： https://t.me/lianshanshequi 无码原片: @fggfa4 日韩无码: @wumaav69 东南亚大事件: @chigua11l 💦熟女的诱惑： https://t.me/qsf66617552 |
| First recorded | 4 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lianshansheqv |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Oct 2026, 21:22 | 2,652 | no change |
| 4 Oct 2026, 20:47 | 2,652 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 29 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 8 (29 September 2026 – 29 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,450 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Oct 2026, 21:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 29 September 2026 to 29 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🍑老司机领航员 💃淫领全球 ❤️关注不迷路 1️⃣无码 原片 ：@TGzt8989ktw 2️⃣胴体 艺术：@zuantu_zu0tua 3️⃣自慰 白虎：@Chat007_guangfang 4️⃣只爱 无码：@tucenew_zuotuktw 5️⃣抖音 快手：@WL222222U 6️⃣乱伦 强奸：@Hello_GPT_fanyi 7️⃣小岛 动漫：@kvmidcgf 8️⃣捆绑 调教：@dianjinyunkonggf 9️⃣性感 写真：@ceoscrim 0️⃣精神小妹 ：@baibing_shuju
24小时人工客服✈️ @TG_zuantu 支持免费测试体验 网页版本 已恢复 专供出海！各大交易所USDT网银转账软件！ 行走江湖必备神器🔥 助力你业绩爆表🎉 支持：🔺Coinbase/钱包🔺Binance(币安)🔺crypto/钱包🔺比特派🔺okx交易所🔺imtoken🔺🔺Metamask🔺Gemini🔺Tokenpocket🔺Safepal🔺Mybit🔺Klever🔺机票🔺汇旺🔺支付宝🔺短信🔺建设🔺新加坡🔺台湾🔺香港🔺日本🔺越南🔺美国🔺澳洲🔺南非🔺马来西亚🔺沙特 https://t.me/zuantu_zu0tua
请广大用户认准唯一官方频道：https://t.me/TGzt8989ktw 在线客服：🥰 @ziizi678888 备用客服：🥰 @duojin_8989k 双向机器人联系 😘 @ziizi678888_bot 全新推出【8989看图王】免费测试 祝各位老板发大财，天天爆单 一共5678个模版
#网易cc #漫妮 #骚舞 高颜御姐骚舞诱惑
#CB站 #ST #lockheadgirld 极品短发女神，直播骚舞道具滋味诱惑
#舞团 #春光娱乐 #娜美 清纯美女热舞诱惑
#网易CC #耶耶 #裸舞 #肥臀 巨乳肥臀美女热舞诱惑 分屏多视角1
❤1
#舞团 #舞出精彩 #乐乐 极品美女ol制服 裸舞诱惑
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @lianshansheqv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“抖音网红|快手网红|黑料吃瓜” (@lianshansheqv), 2,652 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lianshansheqv.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.