Channel
@lianghaoTT
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,199subscribers
+320 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003997757228 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lianghaoTT |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 3 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lianghaoTT |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Aug 2026, 02:52 | 2,199 | +61 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:37 | 2,138 | +235 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:54 | 1,903 | +24 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:16 | 1,879 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (3 July 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,623 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 19:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
夜已经很深了，窗外的风轻轻敲着玻璃，远处的城市像一头沉睡的巨兽，只剩几盏孤灯还在眨眼。 桌上的灯光洒下来，照着这一盘“来自远古的盛宴”。蘑菇藏在翠绿的森林里，辣椒像火山喷出的岩浆，香气随着热气慢慢升起。旁边那只恐龙安静地躺在盘中，仿佛穿越亿万年的时光，只为了等待这一刻的重逢。 我望着它，忍不住叹了一句： “恐龙啊恐龙，你沉睡了这么久，终于还是逃不过今晚的餐桌。” 可是夜太长了，天空还没有泛白。 我坐在窗边，听着风吹过树梢，闻着空气里的香味，开始怀疑—— 是不是白垩纪的太阳也还没升起？ 是不是那群恐龙正在远方的原野上奔跑，等着黎明降临？ 而我，只想问一句： “什么时候天亮啊……” 因为我已经等不及想尝尝这来自一亿年前的“恐龙肉”了。
✅每天都会重新整理一遍可卖名单，方便大家挑选！ -----精品系列1（伪全A） 505 3888 8888 58U 505 8388 8888 58U ⭐505 8838 8888 （本人已使用） 505 8883 8888 58U 505 8888 3888 58U 505 8888 8388 58U 505 8888 8838 58U 505 8888 8883 58U -----精品系列2 （500短号） +500 00100 58u +500 00200 38u +500 00300 38u +500 00400 28u +500 00500 68u +500 00600 58u +500 00700 38u +500 00800 58u +500 00900 58…
+500 aaaab 极品短位已出
+299 abbbbb 已出
+299 abbbbb 已出
+290 abbbbb 极品已出
+6aa aaaaa 极品靓号已出
+500 abbbb +500 abbbb 伪全A靓号×2 已出
+688 aa bbb 已出
+8a 888888888 已出
+290 8aaaa 已出
+500 55a55 已出
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @lianghaoTT. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,062,492 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“飞机靓号（TG靓号）🪸” (@lianghaoTT), 2,199 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lianghaoTT.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.