D's Plays pinned a photo

Channel
D's Plays
@lewDplays
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
7subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001879070825 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lewDplays |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 7 July 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lewDplays |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Oct 2026, 12:09 | 7 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:46 | 8 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:55 | 8 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 7 July 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 July 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
20 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 9 | 45.0% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 25.0% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 20.0% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 5.00% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 5.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2023 to 18 July 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
$PELO Just Launched Safe Team Hyped launch Wait till snipers out and ca cleaned 140K at the time posting it Im aped a smol bag to get entry and wating to ape more 0xb5f736a03bcf41521ea2bbcca159e9e5d24880cc https://t.me/pepelorecoin https://twitter.com/PepeLore_ERC https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x2fd9d025e85a11bac4772783543beacf2c6fb3e3
👍1
D's Plays pinned a photo
😼😼 ETH PLAY 😼😼 ✅#FEPE 30k M cap https://www.dextools.io/app/en/ether/pair-explorer/0x0b4cfad39c4dd9903e4ddfc7e733e032f1904c1a TELEGRAM: https://t.me/Fepecoinerc TWITTER: https://twitter.com/FepeErc WEBSITE: https://www.fepe.vip/ MEDIUM: https://feperec.medium.com/
👍3🔥3❤1
https://www.dextools.io/app/en/ether/pair-explorer/0x8c8661b0fc33c7bb0dba13ad647412a2547b14c0 https://t.me/Pupu_ETH Nice team behind Wait for entry guys 40k mcap
👍1
😼😼😼$STALKER https://www.dextools.io/app/en/ether/pair-explorer/0x03afff429649bdf83e461d0f36c1e8c8f30de772 Called around 21k and Aped more around 50-55k wait for ca clean and I will ape more at dip Their Utility is live and It's work Pepe Tracker - $STALKER WEB: https://www.pepetracker.ltd/ White paper: https://pepetracker.gitbook.io/pepe-tracker/ TW: https://twitter.com/pepetrackereth TG: https://t.me/pepetracker…
❤1🎉1👍1🔥1🥰1
D's Plays pinned a photo
0x43e8a2aCF587f41A3Dd0C49E138F73753b7d27c7 $PEPETRACKER Utility play
❤1
New eggdog Buy! 🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚 🟢 | $92.96 (0.05 WETH) 💳 | 233,699 EGGD 👤 | Buyer / TX 🆕 | New Holder 📊 | Market Cap $393,803 📈 DexTools • Screener 💰 Buy 🔥 Trending 🔥 ETH Trending #2
New eggdog Buy! 🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚 🟢 | $372.73 (0.2 WETH) 💳 | 1,121,049 EGGD 👤 | Buyer / TX 🆕 | New Holder 📊 | Market Cap $329,160 📈 DexTools • Screener 💰 Buy 🔥 Trending 🔥 ETH Trending #3
D's Plays pinned a photo
😼😼😼 $NANODOGE 2.0 0x7d4254a180649e1f926bc540ad8f0d5f8eef2cda Smoothlaunch , no bot at launch 4k Mcap https://t.me/NanoDogetwozero Moon or dust
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @lewDplays. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 3
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 3
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@lewDplays named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“D's Plays” (@lewDplays), 7 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lewDplays.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.