快连VPN官方推广频道 pinned a photo

Channel
快连VPN官方推广频道
@letsvpnworld
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
91,311subscribers
-487 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002197042993 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @letsvpnworld |
| Description | ❏ 快连VPN (LetsVPN) 官方频道 ❏ 官方网站:https://letsvpn.world |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/letsvpnworld |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:24 | 91,311 | -55 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:05 | 91,366 | -89 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:05 | 91,455 | -57 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:16 | 91,512 | -76 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:01 | 91,588 | -69 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:14 | 91,657 | -83 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:29 | 91,740 | -58 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:00 | 91,798 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:59 | 91,798 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 17 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 14.8%
- avg views ÷ 91,311 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 13,500
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.244%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 2
- of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (17 April 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 13,500 |
| Reactions total | 33 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 20:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 148
- Videos
- 8
- Links
- 176
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
6,141 reactions across 15 posts, in 36 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 1,582 | 25.8% | |
| ❤ | 1,178 | 19.2% | |
| 😱 | 1,128 | 18.4% | |
| 👍 | 973 | 15.8% | |
| custom 5843577106725867972 | 402 | 6.55% | |
| 🙏 | 143 | 2.33% | |
| 🗿 | 88 | 1.43% | |
| 🤪 | 85 | 1.38% | |
| 💊 | 76 | 1.24% | |
| 🍌 | 53 | 0.863% | |
| 👏 | 41 | 0.668% | |
| 🥴 | 40 | 0.651% | |
| 🆒 | 36 | 0.586% | |
| 🌭 | 32 | 0.521% | |
| 🔥 | 26 | 0.423% | |
| 🥰 | 25 | 0.407% | |
| custom 5224607267797606837 | 23 | 0.375% | |
| 😇 | 21 | 0.342% | |
| custom 5312445301825493054 | 20 | 0.326% | |
| 👌 | 19 | 0.309% | |
| 16 further kinds | 150 | 2.44% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,141reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 17 April 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 15
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 8
- of 15 we hold a reading for · 53%
- Most on one post
- 4
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @letsvpnworld. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 April 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
📢 LetsVPN 官方信息 请以本频道发布内容为准,认准官方来源,谨防仿冒与诈骗。 📥官方网站 https://letsvpn.world/ 📡 官方频道 https://t.me/letsvpnworld 📡 官方客服 @LetsVPN_CS01 @LetsVPN_CS02 🛡️防骗提醒 以下行为均可能为诈骗请提高警惕: 🔻 群内发布的 广告 / 推广链接 🔻 冒充客服或他人 主动私聊 推销、兜售"内部优惠" 🔻 要求 代付 / 转账 / 拼单 🔻 声称可 解封账户 / 恢复账号 并借此收费 ⚠️ 如遇上述情况:勿转账、勿点击、勿透露个人信息,并及时在群内向官方客服核实、举报。
❤23👍8⚡1😴1
快连VPN官方推广频道 pinned a photo
致快连(LetsVPN)用户: 很抱歉要向大家宣布一个艰难的决定,我们不得不终止面向中国大陆地区的业务运营。 受网络封锁的持续影响,在过去的 20 天里,我们的技术团队几乎是每小时都在进行尝试与调整。然而遗憾的是,经过多番努力,目前已确认无法有效解决连接问题。 为了保障每一位用户的权益,正如我们此前所承诺的: • 无论您的账号近期是否产生过流量,所有退款申请都将以 4 月 8 日作为计算起点。 • 虽然我们已正式关闭了大陆地区的所有支付渠道,但这并不会影响到您的退款流程。请大家放心,每一笔款项我们都会妥善处理。 • 为了进一步加快退款进度,我们目前正全力开发自动化退款系统,以缩短大家的等待时间。 过去一段时间,我们很感谢有机会协助中国客户使用 AI 服务,帮助跨境电商做大。深感遗憾不能再为大家提供服务,我们真的有心无力。 感谢大家过去的信任与支持。
😱1,120🤣472❤295🙏135👍72🗿57🍌31🆒24
4 月 27 日 最近很多人都在议论"是不是跑路了"。理解大家的担心,换作我们自己也会问。但事实是:团队全员在岗,在不断寻找+测试可用方案。问题会解决的,请再给我们一点时间。
🤣192❤57👍22👌19💊12🍌8💯8😱8
快连VPN官方推广频道 pinned a photo
针对近期被问得最多的几个问题,我们在这里统一回复🙏: 1. 当前修复到什么进度了?什么时候能修好? 外部压力仍在不断加剧,我们在不惜一切代价寻找新的方案和可用资源,但目前仍未达到稳定的状态,所以修复时间不敢轻易承诺。有任何进展都会第一时间在群内同步,请再给我们一点时间。 2. 你们是不是要跑路了? 不会跑路。我们一直都在,技术、客服、团队每一个人都在正常运转。用户权益是底线,我们会负责到底。跑路从来都不是我们的选项,把快连 VPN 做回来才是。 3. 到底能不能退款? 可以退款。在 App 菜单栏点击「在线客服」输入“退款”即可提交申请。不存在任何不能退款、不给退款、冷处理的情况。 ** App 内的「在线客服」无需连接 VPN 通过本地网络即可直接联系,若您的本地网络无法打开页面,也可以选择给 [email protected] 邮箱发送邮件,我们会有专人处理。** 4. 在线客服全是 AI,找不到真人,也能退款吗? 可…
👍358❤187🤣73🤪19🔥11💊10🍌8💅8
4 月 24 日 一直都在 问题我们都清楚,正在尽力处理。不会消失,不会甩锅,不会逃避,我们一直都在。
🤣172👍48❤31🗿18🫡15💊14👏7🌭6
4 月 23 日 我们不会放弃 全团队都在盯着,都在想办法。请大家放心,不管多么困难,我们都不会丢下这一切不管。
🤣214👍65❤48🥴18💊12🤪12💯11🕊8
在努力,好了第一时间让你们知道。
🤣121custom 584357710672586797252👍38❤28🤪18custom 522460726779760683716👀13🥴10
4 月 21 日 我们一直在 群里的吐槽、私信里的建议、工单里的问题,我们都在看,都在记。有些还没来得及回复,但请放心,没有一条被忽略,请相信我们,再给我们一些时间。
🤣105❤52👍41custom 584357710672586797234🥴12custom 52246072677976068377🤪6🌭5
🫂4 月 20 日 初心未变 "让你永远能连上"这个目标从来没变过,团队全员在岗,问题在一个一个解决,谢谢你愿意等,我们一定把事情做好。
👍105🤣74custom 584357710672586797244❤32🔥10🍌6🤪6❤🔥5
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @letsvpnworld. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 599,870 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“快连VPN官方推广频道” (@letsvpnworld), 91,311 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/letsvpnworld.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.