Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for LET'S LEARN TOGETHER

Channel

LET'S LEARN TOGETHER

@lets_learn_together_1

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,098subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 26 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001728455372
TypeChannel
Username@lets_learn_together_1
Description🍀Our chat group👉https://t.me/lets_learn_together_chatz 🍀Maths പഠിക്കാൻ pls join 👉https://t.me/Gruhapadam 🍀For years polls 👉https://t.me/psc_years
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded26 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/lets_learn_together_1

Growth

3,09826 Aug 2026, 22:01 — 3,098 subscribers26 Aug 2026, 22:15 — 3,098 subscribers26 Aug 2026, 22:0126 Aug 2026, 22:15
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,095–3,101 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Aug 2026, 22:153,098no change
26 Aug 2026, 22:013,098first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.07%
avg views ÷ 3,098 subscribers
Avg views / post
157
1 post measured
Reaction rate
3.18%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held20 (5 December 202511 August 2026)
Views total157
Reactions total5
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken26 Aug 2026, 22:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
463
Videos
22
Links
1,270

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

12 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1083.3%
👏18.33%
🔥18.33%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 December 2025 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 10:50 UTC157 views5 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Forwarded from @learning_nook

https://youtube.com/shorts/RdQMq4e1wAc?si=1LqSElxSfOl8s99i

4👏1

Signed Ayshu Bai

7 Jun 2026, 02:57 UTC807 views1 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Forwarded from @SCERTDEEPSTUDYPhoto

വിട 🙏 @SCERTDEEPSTUDY

1

Signed Ayshu Bai

9 May 2026, 05:34 UTC≈1,090 viewsread 26 August 2026
Forwarded from @KN_Academy_PSC

https://youtu.be/lfuHmKz2BwY?si=ILp6JXxVP47k6UN1 എല്ലാവരും ഈ വീഡിയോ കാണുക. Psychology ഭാഗത്ത്‌ നിന്നുള്ള മുൻവർഷ ചോദ്യങ്ങളാണ് ഇതിൽ പറയുന്നത്. ഉപകാരപ്പെട്ടാൽ കൂട്ടുകാർക്കും കൂടി ഷെയർ ചെയ്യണേ 😌

Signed 🇭‌𝔸🇵‌ℙ🇾‌🤠

6 May 2026, 03:56 UTC≈1,130 viewsread 26 August 2026

https://youtube.com/shorts/DjVvKeGvw7Y?si=Wldq28aF0b3dviSr

Signed 🇭‌𝔸🇵‌ℙ🇾‌🤠

18 Mar 2026, 18:10 UTC≈1,450 views4 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Photo

അങ്ങനെ നമ്മൾ പതിനായിരം പേർ അടങ്ങുന്ന കുടുംബം ആയി സുഹൃത്തുക്കളെ 😍 LP/UP ഇന്റർവ്യൂ സമയത്ത് തുടങ്ങിയത് ആണ് ഈ യാത്ര... പിന്നീട് അത് SCERT/HSA/HSST etc അങ്ങനെ തുടർന്ന് കൊണ്ടേ ഇരുന്നു...❤️ ഇനിയും കഴിയുന്നത് വരെ തുടരും 🥰 നിങ്ങൾ ഓരോരുത്തരുമാണ്, നിങ്ങളുടെ സപ്പോർട്ട് ആണ് ഈ യാത്ര മുന്നോട്ട് കൊണ്ട് പോകാൻ എന്നെ നയിച്ചത്...✌🏻 ഈ യാത്രയിൽ ക്ലാസ്സ്‌ എടുത്തും ചാനൽ ഷെയർ ചെയ്തും എന്നോടൊപ്പം നിന്ന എന്റെ പ്രിയപ്പെട്ട കൂട്ടുകാരുണ്ട്, അവരെയ

3🔥1

Signed 🇭‌𝔸🇵‌ℙ🇾‌🤠

31 Jan 2026, 03:19 UTC≈1,200 views1 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Forwarded from @learning_nook

💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥 𝗛𝗦𝗦𝗧 𝗖𝗛𝗘𝗠𝗜𝗦𝗧𝗥𝗬 𝗖𝗟𝗔𝗦𝗦 🅃🄸🄼🄴 🅃🄰🄱🄻🄴 2/2/2026 ᴍᴏɴᴅᴀʏ ⏰ 5am 👩 Tr. Ayshu Bai 📖 Structure and bonding in molecules --------------------------------------- 🅒︎🅗︎🅐︎🅝︎🅔︎🅛︎ : https://t.me/learning_nook 🅒︎🅗︎🅐︎🅣︎ 🅖︎🅡︎🅞︎🅤︎🅟︎ : https://t.me/chatting_nook 💐N‌o‌ k‌n‌o‌w‌l‌e‌d‌g‌e‌ i‌s‌ s‌m‌a‌l‌l‌💐

1

Signed Ayshu Bai

27 Jan 2026, 15:19 UTC≈1,060 viewsread 26 August 2026
Forwarded from @learning_nook

https://youtube.com/shorts/FGs0CH5hpmE?si=2cGuIqMc3OjtvfgT

Signed Ayshu Bai

24 Jan 2026, 14:51 UTC≈1,190 viewsread 26 August 2026

https://youtu.be/yhxlCqrY2DE?si=RAH1Q3tpksV32RMw

Signed Ayshu Bai

13 Jan 2026, 14:48 UTC≈1,360 viewsread 26 August 2026

https://youtube.com/shorts/gN_tcEDxoXE?si=vB9tpUNFDvgptRD8

Signed 🇭‌𝕒🇵‌𝕡🇾‌🤠

11 Jan 2026, 06:37 UTC≈1,030 viewsread 26 August 2026

https://youtu.be/8C54NTK9wp8?si=VbYP6WWz6ucEfHuu

Signed 🇭‌𝕒🇵‌𝕡🇾‌🤠

2 Jan 2026, 16:10 UTC937 viewsread 26 August 2026

https://youtu.be/aSFuJtxx220?si=Jx88qfE_DvmAsmdN

Signed Ayshu Bai

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @lets_learn_together_1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Knowledge Factory PSC
@KFPSC · 51,581
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 26 August 2026
R talks PSC
@rtalks_official · 66,912
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 26 August 2026
IMPETUS LEARNINGS
@HOTOPICS · 84,667
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 26 August 2026
Harshitham Edutech
@harshithamedutech · 85,198
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“LET'S LEARN TOGETHER” (@lets_learn_together_1), 3,098 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lets_learn_together_1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.