Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Егор Cache it

@lets_cache

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,516subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002055567688
TypeChannel
Username@lets_cache
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/lets_cache

Growth

1,5161,5171,516.56 August 2026 — 1,517 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,517 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,516 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 6 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,516–1,517 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 14:571,516-1
6 Aug 2026, 07:351,517no change
6 Aug 2026, 07:071,517first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 14 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9m 04s
Average length
42s

Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

250 reactions across 17 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥9236.8%
7931.6%
👍3313.2%
😁2710.8%
🎉104.00%
💯83.20%
10.4%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 250reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 14 May 2026 to 29 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 17 we hold a reading for · 12%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lets_cache. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 May 2026 to 29 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

29 Jun 2026, 15:47 UTC610 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Потестил бета-анимации в Figma. Из плюсов: удобно, не надо тащить всё в AE и пытаться подогнать визуал к Figma, потому что все осталось внутри пакета. Все таки есть ключи для анимации +- всех параметров, включая растровые эффекты. Для баннеров, простых промо и визуальных переходов — плюс-минус рабочая история. Еще, разработчики могут смотреть всё в одном месте, но опять же большой анимационный флоу не собрать: для э

👍5😁2🔥1

25 Jun 2026, 07:08 UTC712 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Кажется, что только ленивый еще не плюнул в сторону нового апдейта Figma. Я общего вайба не разделяю, хотя и согласен, что гейм-ченджер фич не привезли. Figma выкатила инструменты для анимации и для меня это огромный плюс, так как это решает ряд проблем. Как выглядит пайплайн сейчас: интерфейс у тебя тут, анимация там. А у тебя навигационная анимация? Тогда тебе сюда. Компонентная? Нет, тогда будь добр идти сюда. В

🔥6🎉3💯3

9 Jun 2026, 11:31 UTC902 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Ребята из Tribute дропнули новый ролик В целом — получилось супер мемно, кайфанул!

🔥29😁4👍3

9 Jun 2026, 04:21 UTC841 views20 reactions5 Starsread 7 August 2026
Video

Моя лента после вчерашнего WWDC 2026

😁12👍6🔥2

8 Jun 2026, 07:26 UTC748 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Ну и небольшой тизер-ролик всего происходящего внутри Внимательный зритель найдет автора канала в его усатой фазе P.S.: Костя, за музыку отдельно целую в губы

🔥75👍3

8 Jun 2026, 07:24 UTC678 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Легендарный Костян выкатил апдейт не менее легендарного ADDD Хайли рекоменд, долго сам занимался с Костей, как с куратором, так и в общем коммьюнити В закладочки

4🎉2

8 Jun 2026, 07:23 UTC471 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @sinnerkot_talksVideo

artdirectiondeepdive.com Прошло 1,5 года с момента релиза первой версии ADDD. На первой итерации удалось отточить то, как должен выглядеть формат, как должны проходить занятия, какой информации не хватает. И понять главное - чем же это должно стать в итоге, и в каком виде? Сегодня, я готов представить вам релиз полностью обновленной версии ADDD. Полноценной системы перехода от дизайнера к арт-директору. artdirecti

6

6 Jun 2026, 07:14 UTC628 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Вооооот Теперь то мы точно подписочку на хиггс продлеваем

🎉5😁5

2 Jun 2026, 15:56 UTC857 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Интересная находка: Как проще создавать сложные сценарии-скрипты для AE через Codex (Claude, Cursor, неважно). Проблема: В Photoshop есть Actions, который позволяет записать последовательность действий и забиндить их на 1 команду, а дальше хоть на горячую клавишу привязать и вызывать когда это нужно В АЕ маленькая инди-компания Adobe такой роскоши не привезла и каждый раз, когда надо было сделать что-то сложнее прес

🔥13👍84

22 May 2026, 13:32 UTC848 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Найден мастерпис! Забайтился инстаграмом на просмотр «Ателье колдовских колпаков» и проглотил все вышедшие серии за 1 присест! Я пел оды картинке в Фрирен, так вот тут это какой-то другой уровень. Кажется, для меня это самая красочная анимация из всего что я смотрел. Эффекты, дизайн персонажей — просто восторг. Сеттинг тоже интересный, хотя сюжет, не самый прорывной, но и заскучать тоже не дает. В общем, советую не

🔥851👍1

22 May 2026, 10:30 UTC680 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Если кто-то понял синьку — это Саня

💯4

22 May 2026, 10:30 UTC542 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @petaloombaVideo

MOVE UNTIL GOOD → Intro to my eyes Двухнедельный интенсив о моём взгляде на симуляции в Cinema 4D. Первый состав отправляется 1 июня. moveuntilgood.com

4🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @lets_cache. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 539,604 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Егор Cache it” (@lets_cache), 1,516 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lets_cache.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.