Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Rug Pull Bot - rugpullbot.com

Channel

Rug Pull Bot - rugpullbot.com

@letmerug

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Cite this entry

161,380subscribers

+17,289 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002435401670
TypeChannel
Username@letmerug
DescriptionRugPullBot is a crypto bot for creating and managing deceptive tokens on Solana and BSC chains effortlessly. Profits: https://t.me/letmeprofit Bot: @Therugpullbot Admin: @theonlyrugger
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/letmerug

Topic

Hacking & security — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

89,500 average views per post against 161,380 subscribers — an engagement rate of 55.4%. Across the 1,171 registered channels in the same cohort — 100,014–314,959 subscribers, posting mainly in English — the middle half sit between 0.922% and 8.83%, with a median of 3.46%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (31 August 2026 – 30 September 2026)
Posts measured9 of 9 published in the window (1 exact, 8 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled805,166
Mature posts only55.4% over 9 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers161,380 measured 25 September 2026
Cohortb100000:eng · 1,171 channels · p10 0.285% · p25 0.922% · p50 3.46% · p75 8.83% · p90 16.7%
Position in cohort99.829th percentile · 16.0× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.08% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageEnglish · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 30 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

115,731161,380138,555.57 August 2026 — 144,091 subscribers8 August 2026 — 143,773 subscribers9 August 2026 — 143,524 subscribers10 August 2026 — 143,251 subscribers11 August 2026 — 136,884 subscribers12 August 2026 — 136,710 subscribers13 August 2026 — 136,368 subscribers14 August 2026 — 136,054 subscribers16 August 2026 — 135,777 subscribers17 August 2026 — 135,320 subscribers18 August 2026 — 140,048 subscribers19 August 2026 — 138,780 subscribers20 August 2026 — 138,489 subscribers21 August 2026 — 138,396 subscribers22 August 2026 — 137,645 subscribers24 August 2026 — 136,422 subscribers25 August 2026 — 136,125 subscribers26 August 2026 — 135,845 subscribers26 August 2026 — 135,663 subscribers27 August 2026 — 135,305 subscribers28 August 2026 — 134,974 subscribers29 August 2026 — 134,718 subscribers30 August 2026 — 134,548 subscribers31 August 2026 — 134,304 subscribers1 September 2026 — 120,918 subscribers2 September 2026 — 120,772 subscribers3 September 2026 — 120,838 subscribers5 September 2026 — 125,107 subscribers9 September 2026 — 123,772 subscribers11 September 2026 — 122,391 subscribers13 September 2026 — 121,804 subscribers15 September 2026 — 121,212 subscribers17 September 2026 — 115,731 subscribers25 September 2026 — 161,380 subscribers7 August 202625 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 49 days, net +17,289. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 108,884–168,227 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 11:22161,380+45,649
17 Sept 2026, 07:21115,731-5,481
15 Sept 2026, 03:59121,212-592
13 Sept 2026, 12:36121,804-587
11 Sept 2026, 19:22122,391-1,381
9 Sept 2026, 08:17123,772-1,335
5 Sept 2026, 22:19125,107+4,269
3 Sept 2026, 17:56120,838+66
2 Sept 2026, 12:36120,772-146
1 Sept 2026, 14:47120,918-13,386
31 Aug 2026, 12:36134,304-244
30 Aug 2026, 10:55134,548-170
29 Aug 2026, 14:26134,718-256
28 Aug 2026, 17:44134,974-331
27 Aug 2026, 21:02135,305-358
26 Aug 2026, 22:49135,663-182
26 Aug 2026, 02:12135,845-280
25 Aug 2026, 04:45136,125-297
24 Aug 2026, 05:29136,422-1,223
22 Aug 2026, 16:42137,645first reading

Engagement

35 posts held, back to 25 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 112 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
55.4%
avg views ÷ 161,380 subscribers
Avg views / post
89,500
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
9
of 35 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026
Posts held35 (25 May 2026 – 24 September 2026)
Views total805,166
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Sept 2026, 22:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
123
Videos
21
Links
109

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 14s
Average length
19s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

24 Sept 2026, 10:17 UTC≈97,200 viewsread 29 September 2026
Photo

So good to see that 80% of user launches nowadays use AI mode :)

21 Sept 2026, 20:21 UTC466 viewsread 29 September 2026
Photo

AI mode users just got a big update! Want to switch from SOL to BSC and vice versa easily? You can now easily do that on the browser using the Swap and bridge feature on your main dashboard, for only a small 0.5% fee, convert any amount back and fourth from either BSC or SOL chain. BNB now is at $800 - AI mode with BSC is still MUCH more profitable to use but slightly more expensive than SOL AI mode, but definitely …

17 Sept 2026, 18:19 UTC≈108,000 viewsread 29 September 2026
Photo

$SOL is back to $100, where are all the haters now? And yet here you are still contemplating whether to buy or start making money yet. https://www.gethashwallet.com #hashwalletpartner

15 Sept 2026, 02:33 UTC≈126,000 viewsread 29 September 2026

We will soon start working on ETH rug pulls; this might come as early as Q1 2027 due to popular demand. For now, do not forget to keep using the almighty AI mode for BSC, as it's insanely good. 3 free key to redeem Basic: https://www.rugpullbot.com/?ref=BASIC666 And if you couldn't manage to get a free subscription from this giveaway; you can use code ROSE for 15% off :) happy rugging!

9 Sept 2026, 16:52 UTC≈110,000 viewsread 29 September 2026
Photo

Power of AI mode; fastest $2,000 USD you will make in your life, and that's just one coin out of thousands, https://rugpullbot.com/rugs

7 Sept 2026, 23:33 UTC≈71,300 viewsread 29 September 2026

Giveaway time! First 3 people to use "giveaway-527685" coupon code get a FREE lifetime subscription! Goodluck! https://www.rugpullbot.com/?ref=GIVEAWAY-527685

3 Sept 2026, 18:31 UTC≈24,200 viewsread 29 September 2026

Looking for TikTok ads manager, message @theonlyrugger with your experience & portfolio.

30 Aug 2026, 19:05 UTC≈117,000 viewsread 29 September 2026
Video

Party anywhere in the world while making $$$$$ Tap in rugpullbot.com

27 Aug 2026, 21:23 UTC≈143,000 viewsread 29 September 2026

to the people in the back telling me i use fake phantom 🤡🫵

Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @letmerug. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@letmerug edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
20 August 2026
Most recent edit
20 August 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Rug Pull Bot - rugpullbot.com” (@letmerug), 161,380 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/letmerug.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.