Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Letícia Arsenio

Channel

Letícia Arsenio

@leticiaarsenio

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

252subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001487282058
TypeChannel
Username@leticiaarsenio
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 October 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/leticiaarsenio

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 43% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

252259255.57 August 2026 — 259 subscribers8 August 2026 — 259 subscribers15 August 2026 — 257 subscribers23 August 2026 — 255 subscribers30 August 2026 — 253 subscribers8 September 2026 — 255 subscribers1 October 2026 — 253 subscribers11 October 2026 — 252 subscribers7 August 202611 October 2026
8 measurements spanning 65 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 251–260 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Oct 2026, 08:40252-1
1 Oct 2026, 15:00253-2
8 Sept 2026, 09:18255+2
30 Aug 2026, 01:36253-2
23 Aug 2026, 11:18255-2
15 Aug 2026, 08:03257-2
8 Aug 2026, 09:15259no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:45259first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 8 January 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 12s
Average length
44s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

131 reactions across 14 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤔3022.9%
😢2619.8%
🤣2619.8%
👍1813.7%
🤯139.92%
👌107.63%
👏64.58%
❤10.763%
🔥10.763%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 131 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 8 January 2023 to 26 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Jun 2026, 06:41 UTCviews —

The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 27 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.

13 Feb 2023, 21:01 UTC≈2,870 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Aparentemente o governo brasileiro também pediu para que os cidadãos brasileiros deixem a Rússia imediatamente

🤔6👍2

13 Feb 2023, 20:55 UTC≈2,790 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

A Embaixada dos EUA na Rússia pediu a todos os seus cidadãos que saiam imediatamente da Rússia.

🤔8

2 Feb 2023, 12:31 UTC≈1,790 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

🚨URGENTE: Glória Maria acabou de falecer. Confira o anúncio no jornal. Que dia triste para o Brasil!

😢8🤣1

25 Jan 2023, 13:50 UTC≈1,760 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Vocês usariam o PIX se tivessem que pagar uma taxa de 10% na transação?

  1. Sim, usaria e pagaria a taxa3%
  2. Não usaria, buscaria outros meios97%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Jan 2023, 13:48 UTC≈1,550 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Quem em sã consciência usaria o PIX tendo que pagar 10% do valor na transação? Digno de aparecer no Valuation Freestyle

🤣6🤯4

13 Jan 2023, 12:43 UTC≈1,560 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

De acordo com a CNN, a pena pode chegar a 91 anos de prisão

👍4🤔2

12 Jan 2023, 20:55 UTC≈1,830 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

O Palácio da Alvorada não foi destruído pela invasão. A Granja do Torto, uma espécie de casa de campo presidencial que conta com mais de 370 mil metros quadrados, também não foi destruído. Por que o Lula então quer reformar os dois sem licitação? Por que diz que está sem uma casa quando tem um Palácio e uma Granja de vários hectares para morar?

🤯9👍3❤1

12 Jan 2023, 20:26 UTC≈1,690 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Não tem dinheiro para aumentar o salário mínimo, mas tem dinheiro para aumentar o salário dos ministros para mais de R$46 mil… Ainda que fiscalmente sejam valores diferentes, é importante manter a moralidade e coerência de discurso Situação completamente absurda

👌10😢3

9 Jan 2023, 12:51 UTC≈1,780 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://twitter.com/pcdf_oficial/status/1612267183081504768?s=46&t=RtGIvqazpgMfSRRp5dn6NA De acordo com o Twitter da Polícia Civil do DF, foram 300 presos ontem e seguem prendendo mais pessoas

👏6

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @leticiaarsenio. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

25 Jan 2023, 13:50 UTCAnonymous Poll158 voters

Vocês usariam o PIX se tivessem que pagar uma taxa de 10% na transação?

  1. Sim, usaria e pagaria a taxa3%
  2. Não usaria, buscaria outros meios97%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 8 January 2023 to 26 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Letícia Arsenio” (@leticiaarsenio), 252 subscribers as measured 11 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/leticiaarsenio.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.