Channel
@leqalbhay
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,346subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001456420655 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @leqalbhay |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/leqalbhay |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:36 | 4,346 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:10 | 4,347 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:34 | 4,350 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (2 June 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,138 |
| Reactions total | 25 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 18:19 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
97 reactions across 18 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 78 | 80.4% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 10.3% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 5.15% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 3.09% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.03% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 97reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
تابع.. كل ذلك لنكون أكثر عبودية لله تبارك وتعالى، وأكثر قربًا من رضاه، وأكثر سعيًا للثبات على طريق الهداية،، مستعينين به سبحانه في كل خطوة،، لقد انتهت اللقاءات، لكننا نرجو أن تكون رحلة القيم قد بدأت فعلًا،، وأن يبقى أثرها ممتدًّا في النفوس، ظاهرًا في الاختيارات والمواقف والأعمال،، فنسأل الله أن يبارك في الغرس، ويُنمّي أثره، ويجعل هذا العمل خالصًا لوجهه الكريم،، وأن يبارك في يافعات رُشد اللواتي انضممن إلينا من أقط…
❤2
مرّ أسبوع على آخر جلسة من جلسات 🔸مسار رُشد لليافعات🔸 وما زال غياب اللقاء الأسبوعي يُشعرنا بأن شيئًا اعتدناه على مدى ستة أشهر قد انتهى،، أربعة وعشرون أسبوعًا التقينا فيها؛ لنتعلّم معًا كيف نعيد تشكيل بنائنا القيمي انطلاقًا من الوحي، وكيف نجعل القيم التي نؤمن بها معاني حاضرة في حياتنا، لا مفاهيم نعرفها فحسب،، سبع وأربعون قيمة، هي القيم الأساسية والفرعية لبرنامج (رُشد للتربية القيمية)، تناولناها في مسار أُعدّ خصيصًا…
❤1
في برنامج سَمْت،، لن نسير في رحلةٍ معرفية فحسب،، بل في رحلةٍ إيمانيةٍ تزكويةٍ عملية،، نُبحر فيها مع آيات كتاب الله العزيز،، ونستلهم منها أسس الوحي في تربية النفس وتزكيتها،، لأن من عرف نفسه على هدي الوحي، كان أقرب إلى إصلاحها بعون الله تعالى،، سَمْت دليل الوحي في تربية النفس،، للتسجيل عبر الرابط: https://forms.gle/e5kML7eSAXZWz64z6 #لقلب_حي #دليل_الوحي
أحسِن الانشغال،، #لقلب_حي
❤1
استسلام،، #لقلب_حي
❤6
حين يكثر حديث الإنسان عن نفسه، ومشاعره، واحتياجاته، وجراحه، وسلوكه،، يبقى السؤال الأهم؛ كيف عرّفنا الوحي بأنفسنا؟ وكيف نرى نفوسنا كما يريد الله لنا أن نراها؟ وكيف نربيها لا لنرضى عنها نحن، بل لتسير إلى الله بصدق وبصيرة؟ 🔸سَمْت دليل الوحي في تربية النفس ▫️أحد برامج دليل الوحي،، نعود فيه إلى القرآن الكريم أصلًا ومرجعًا في فهم النفس،، وميزانًا نعرض عليه مشاعرها وعللها واختياراتها،، وطريقًا نهتدي به في تربيتها وتزكي…
❤3
﴿قُل كُلٌّ يَعمَلُ عَلى شاكِلَتِهِ فَرَبُّكُم أَعلَمُ بِمَن هُوَ أَهدى سَبيلًا﴾ [الإسراء: ٨٤]
❤2👍1
سؤال مشروع: لم قد نفشل في التربية مع أننا نعتقد أننا قمنا بما ينبغي علينا القيام به؟ محاولة للإجابة في المقال: https://baneyat.org/why-command-based-parenting-fails/
❤3
Photo, posted without a caption
❤6
منذ ٦ سنوات من فضل الله ومنته انطلق #لقلب_حي ومنذ ذلك الحين أكرمنا الله تبارك وتعالى ب: ▫️عشرات السلاسل،، ▫️مئات الجلسات،، ▫️آلاف الحاضرين والقارئين والمتابعين،، مشروع نسأل الله أن يبارك في غرسه،، وأن يجعله خالصًا لوجهه الكريم،، وأن يبقى أثرًا صالحًا نافعًا يتقبله الله منا بعد رحيلنا،، ومن المشاريع القائمة اليوم في قنوات لقلب حي المختلفة: ▫️مشروع هُداة للحفظ التدبري التطبيقي،، ▫️سلسلة ( فاعلم أنه لا إله إلا الل…
❤11👏1
افعلها لله،،
❤14
حمدًا لله تعالى على إتمام سورة الأنعام والبدء بسورة الأعراف 🌾،، يعلن مشروع هداة للحفظ التدبري التطبيقي عن فتح باب الانضمام من جديد للمشروع ،، للبدء بالحفظ والتدبر من سورة الأعراف، والاستفادة من التسجيلات المتاحة للسور السابقة التي أنعم الله علينا بتدبرها،، التسجيل متاح حتى مساء يوم غد الأحد،، للانضمام من خلال الرابط التالي، (ولا بدّ بعد الانتهاء من التسجيل الانضمام إلى قناة المشروع، التي يظهر رابطها بعد الإرسال …
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @leqalbhay. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 442,413 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“لقلبٍ حي” (@leqalbhay), 4,346 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/leqalbhay.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.