8 measurements spanning 5 days, net -99. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,728–21,857 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 02:25
21,743
-13
12 Aug 2026, 02:43
21,756
-3
11 Aug 2026, 01:31
21,759
-10
9 Aug 2026, 23:31
21,769
-10
8 Aug 2026, 23:38
21,779
-57
8 Aug 2026, 00:21
21,836
-6
7 Aug 2026, 18:30
21,842
no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:23
21,842
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 24 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
138
Videos
27
Links
113
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
50s
Average length
17s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
861 reactions across 15 posts, in 1 kind.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
861
100.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 861reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 24 February 2026 to 9 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 15 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @leoonton. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 February 2026 to 9 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
👀 Let’s look back
I’ve always told you $TON has a massive potential
And now we clearly see it coming to life
@monk united Telegram and TON, made it the fastest chain and introduced 20% APY on $TON
And there are 4 more steps of a grand plan to Make Ton Great Again
🪙 $TON is now at 2,5$, no question in hitting 3$ soon
Hope you are still holding with me, for your own prosperity
Leo on Ton | Chat
🛢 Oil hits $120
The easiest trade you could’ve pulled
🤚 Hormuz was blocked in the end of February and Oil was at $90-$100
It is one of the most crucial transfer points of Oil in the whole world
If you had any logic and self control you would’ve entered asap
And trust me, it’s not the ATH yet)
Leo on Ton | Chat
Scam Altman and Elon Musk
Elon got really agressive towards Sam Altman as of yesterday
He accussed him of secretly owning the OpenAI Startup Fund
Is he really – we can’t know for sure just yet
👀 But let’s look at it from another perspective
Elon can blackmail Sam to drive their stock down
This can make OpenAI struggling
And Elon will be happy to acquire them for a reasonable price
🔍 I’d love to see how it goes…
⛔️ Trump almost got killed
Yesterday Trump held a dinner party
Everything seemed safe until people heard gunshots
Another attempt of murder even during a friendly dinner
SEC neutralized the guy immediately
📉 Supposed reason is Trump token price manipulation
It worked, but only for a 5% dump
People completely lost their mind chasing money…
Leo on Ton | Chat
🦸♂️ @monk got a little too excited
✈️ While gifts designers are chilling somewhere on the Caribbean coast Pasha locked in
Our beloved founder haven’t missed a day without tweeting for a week and keeps going
😞 Telegram already introduced numerous updates, like AI-agentic bots
I think this will result in a great upside for $TON one way or another
Pasha is a founder that is always moving and he won’t let $TON walk…
🐸 Money is not in gifts, but around them
People don’t take more profits flipping or holding gifts
They create businesses around them
🐍 Naga Serena is a brilliant example
An artist that created paintings for big influencers in TON ecosystem
She applied her skills and positioned herself right
At that paid
@monk just bought a Plush Pepe painting from her today
There are too much opportunities, so what’s your excuse…
🐻 The market ain’t so promising right now
The market is changing in a rapid pace
Towards stability of course
📌 For example:
Bitcoin mining difficulty dropped by 7.76%
Because miners don’t see any return and move to AI
Venture Capital loses interest in crypto
Amount of investments in crypto projects decreases and the process becomes more selective
No more meme projects built on hype
But what will be the next meta?…
👀 What should you do in crypto?
All you hear now is:
- Memes are dead
- NFTs are dead
- InfoFi is dead
- ICOs are dead
- DeFi is dead
But have you spent an hour a day watching gifts’ prices change?
Have you spent 30 minutes a day looking for arbitrage or funding situations?
Have you reached out to any influencer or project to find out how you can be of service?
🎁 And the answer is – no
When people is earning m…
🏎️ Telegram Gifts – how is it going
Total supply: 9,859,067 NFTs
Total holders: 2,528,830
Unique traders: 624,583
Current MC: ~$200M
Total collections: 138 (107 upgraded)
Largest sale: Plush Pepe #2 - $295k
Collabs: UFC Strike, Snoop Dogg, Khabib
I can’t imagine how all of these happened in just a little over a year
Without $TON and gifts I wouldn’t have been here in th first place
I’m extremely grateful to be abl…
🚫 Token2049 is cancelled
This spring Dubai supposed to be the center of grand crypto-events
👀 For example
• Ton Foundation Gateway – 30 April - 1 May
• TOKEN2049 Dubai – 30 April - 1 May
• Dubai FinTech Summit – 12 - 13 May
• Future Blockchain Summit – October
Due to safety reasons Gateway and Token2049 were cancelled and postponed until 2027
I personally understand the reason, but it’s frustrating to see suc…
🤖 AI agent boom on TON
Just look at this spike
7,000,000 unique users of @botfather
🦀 All because of OpenClaw
People get that $TON, Telegram and AI is the future
That’s why there was announced a Ton AI Agent Hackathon
💵 The main prize is $20,000
Things are not going how we expected them to go
There is something way bigger ahead
Leo on Ton | Chat
🦸♂️ Why microtrends will always outperform generational stability
Has anyone told you to save your money and put it into some ETF or index fund for 30+ years and you will be a millionaire?
Do you really wanna live such a life?
Waiting your best years to withdraw that interest…
👀 But how are people making it so young?
– Microtrends and experience
When you see a pattern in something early – thats where you make …
❤54
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @leoonton. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Leo on ton” (@leoonton), 21,743 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/leoonton.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.