Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
3 measurements spanning 17 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 474–476 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 12:16
476
+2
4 Sept 2026, 01:40
474
-1
2 Sept 2026, 16:16
475
first reading
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
18.5%
avg views ÷ 476 subscribers
Avg views / post
88.0
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.52%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 13 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held
13 (12 July 2026 – 31 August 2026)
Views total
176
Reactions total
15
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 16:16 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
16s
Average length
16s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
118 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5422766914122309386
41
34.7%
⚡
32
27.1%
🤯
19
16.1%
custom 5240003166480661221
16
13.6%
custom 5460980668378931880
8
6.78%
custom 5242628357866158784
2
1.69%
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 118 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🤩 Если вы давно к нам не заходили…
Вы точно пропустили кое-что важное 👀
В Leo обновилось меню – и это только начало. Теперь некоторые позиции будут меняться каждую неделю, так что привычный заход за шавой вполне может превратиться в маленькое гастрономическое приключение.
А теперь по секрету…🤫
В будущем вас ждут вкусы шавермы, которых вы ещё нигде не пробовали!
Ждём в Leo. Охота продолжается! 🤩
LEO.zip
📊 29 августа - дегустация авторских шаверм и настоек в Лео!
В прошлый раз наши шавермье отметили:
Деревенская шаверма занимает уверенное первое место. Насыщенный вкус, вкусная пряность после кимчи.
Предлагаем лично проверить это утверждение. Вдруг именно твой отзыв определит следующий топ?
🥤Для наших шавермье мы предложим бесплатный напиток
⏰ 29/08, 19:00
📍 Ул. Лизы Чайкиной, 1
✅ вход свободный
LEO.zip
Как обновить карту лояльности и не потерять свой прогресс 🤩
Чтобы все ваши накопления сохранились, нужна буквально минута:
🔗Откройте Wallet на телефоне.
🔗Найдите и откройте нашу карту лояльности.
🔗В правом верхнем углу нажмите на три точки.
🔗Перейдите в раздел «Данные карты».
🔗На открывшейся странице нажмите на ссылку — вас перенаправит на сайт.
🔗Нажмите «Установить новую карту».
🔗После этого снова добавьте обновлё…
🔎 Небольшой тест на внимательность от Leo
Первый, кто найдёт все 5
отличий получит шаверму с курицей на лопате в подарок 🎁
Пишите ваши догадки в комментариях
LEO.zip
🌞 Уже август…
Если лето пролетело быстрее, чем ты успел отдохнуть – пора это исправлять!
7 августа встречаемся в Leo Pride на стендапе от 112studio. Хорошие шутки, вкусная шаверма и вечер, который точно не пролетит незаметно 🤩
⏰ 07.08, 20:00
📍 Ср. проспект В.О., 83
📋 Вход по регистрации
LEO.zip
Псс…
📋 Хотели напомнить, что бронировать столик теперь стало ещё удобнее
Просто переходи на наши точки Leo Space и Leo Garden в Яндекс картах и выбирай удобный день и время буквально в пару кликов!🤩
LEO.zip
АВГУСТ В ПРАЙДЕ ⛱️
Август — это как воскресенье лета: хочется успеть всё и сразу. Поэтому мы уже составили для вас план, чтобы не пришлось мучиться вопросом: «Куда сегодня?»😏
07.08 — стендап от 112studio – начинаем месяц с правильной разминки для мышц лица
21.08 — стендап от 112studio
очередной пятничный детокс
29.08 — дегустация
зачем выбирать, если можно попробовать все? а потом составить свой рейтинг и вернут…
📈 Индекс хорошего настроения на пятницу
18:00 — думаешь, куда пойти
19:00 — зовёшь друзей в Лео
20:00 — уже смеёшься на стендапе от 112studio
22:00 — обсуждаешь любимые шутки за шавермой
Кажется, идеальный сценарий на вечер найден.
⏰ 24.07, 20:00
📍 Ул. Лизы Чайкиной, 1
📋 Вход по предварительной регистрации
LEO.zip
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @leo_shaverma_bar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LEO.zip” (@leo_shaverma_bar), 476 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/leo_shaverma_bar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
