Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Lenosky indicators&trading

Channel

Lenosky indicators&trading

@lenoskypaul

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

1,370subscribers

-8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002001364421
TypeChannel
Username@lenoskypaul
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 19 February 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/lenoskypaul

Growth

1,3701,3781,3747 August 2026 — 1,378 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,377 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,377 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,376 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,373 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,371 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,370 subscribers7 August 202630 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 22 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,369–1,379 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 01:341,370-1
27 Aug 2026, 01:121,371-2
17 Aug 2026, 09:331,373-3
13 Aug 2026, 10:341,376-1
7 Aug 2026, 22:181,377no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:081,377-1
7 Aug 2026, 14:101,378first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 19 February 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

17 Sept 2025, 18:13 UTC≈1,600 viewsread 7 August 2026

Hooray! A new article! https://medium.com/@paullenosky/i-taught-my-mom-to-trading-if-she-can-do-it-so-can-you-072d8b98e046

9 Sept 2025, 12:11 UTC≈1,490 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Hello everyone, I want to apologize for my unexpected absence these past nine months. Unavoidable family circumstances required my full attention. However, I'm excited to return with a significant update. This period allowed me to completely re-engineer the indicator, resulting in a much more powerful and refined tool. I believe it will justify the extended development time. The new version has been automatically

Signed Paul Lenosky

9 Sept 2025, 12:11 UTC≈1,680 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

To view the indicator documentation, click the "three dots" and choose "About this script…":

Signed Paul Lenosky

9 Sept 2025, 12:11 UTC≈2,090 viewsread 7 August 2026

A new long article has been published on Medium about how to trade support and resistance levels (manually and with an indicator): https://medium.com/@paullenosky/the-best-trading-strategy-ive-used-in-9-years-a53d6067983c

Signed Paul Lenosky

6 Dec 2024, 20:43 UTC≈4,620 viewsread 7 August 2026

Hello everyone! I have met and talked to many of you over these past couple of days and I am so glad I did. I was surprised by how many wonderful people there are in our world. All of you are from completely different corners of our planet, and yet absolutely everyone I've had the honor of talking to has been incredible. And each in their own way. Tomorrow I'm going to start creating the video documentation. There

Signed Paul Lenosky

5 Dec 2024, 03:13 UTC≈3,820 viewsread 7 August 2026

The further plan is as follows: I'm going to hire two more programmers to speed up indicator creation and testing on deep historical data. I myself didn't like having it all on me. Combining trading and constantly writing code is hard. And my incredible perfectionism does not allow me to do everything quickly. That's why it's time to hire helpers. I also still have a great desire to create a good mobile trading te

Signed Paul Lenosky

5 Dec 2024, 00:36 UTC≈3,200 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://medium.com/@paullenosky/e4f43ccbb85d Hello. I have written a new article that you will probably find very useful. Now I've really finished the indicator.

Signed Paul Lenosky

16 Sept 2024, 19:33 UTC≈3,720 viewsread 7 August 2026

Part 2: At the same time and in parallel, I was developing about 10 major branches of the level breakout indicator, each with its own unique approach to level detection. As of recently, there is only one version left, the most powerful one, which includes the best algorithms that have been tested hundreds of damn times. All that's left to do is clean up the code and add shor levels, it won't take long. I can't wait

Signed Paul Lenosky

16 Sept 2024, 19:33 UTC≈3,100 viewsread 7 August 2026

Friends, I want to apologize for the long silence. It's been a really long time since my last post, a lot of things have happened during this time and I want to share it with you. I apologize if the text is a bit rambling. I didn't have time to edit it. My absence started with the fact that many of you who wrote to me did not know how to trade breakout of levels (as well as false breakout) and insistently asked me

Signed Paul Lenosky

3 Mar 2024, 18:29 UTC≈5,730 viewsread 7 August 2026

The second part of the post: My indicator has no settings that affect the indicator calculations. When I first started making the indicator, such settings were there to save development time. Gradually I automated all of them and now there are no settings at all, which affect the indicator calculations. Please, if possible, use only those indicators that do not have settings that affect the indicator calculations.

Signed Paul Lenosky

3 Mar 2024, 18:29 UTC≈5,110 viewsread 7 August 2026

Hello, wonderful people! I realize that some of you know all of what I am about to write about, but it is imperative that in general all people know and understand it. That's why I wrote this post. A person wrote to me today and said he was so tired of using a lot of indicators and asked if my indicator was good. When I see people who use indicators, I can't pass by without commenting on this issue. Because at one

Signed Paul Lenosky

3 Mar 2024, 15:50 UTC≈4,550 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Please answer the question if you don't mind:

  1. I trade only cryptocurrencies35%
  2. I trade other markets (forex, stock, something else), not cryptocurrencies36%
  3. I trade cryptocurrencies and other markets30%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed Paul Lenosky

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @lenoskypaul. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Mar 2024, 15:50 UTCAnonymous Poll1,260 voters approx.

Please answer the question if you don't mind:

  1. I trade only cryptocurrencies35%
  2. I trade other markets (forex, stock, something else), not cryptocurrencies36%
  3. I trade cryptocurrencies and other markets30%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 19 February 2024 to 17 September 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Lenosky indicators&trading” (@lenoskypaul), 1,370 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lenoskypaul.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.