4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,072–2,078 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 05:24
2,077
+2
10 Aug 2026, 03:32
2,075
+2
6 Aug 2026, 22:54
2,073
-1
6 Aug 2026, 09:37
2,074
first reading
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 8 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
26.8%
avg views ÷ 2,077 subscribers
Avg views / post
556
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.64%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 14 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 July 2026
Posts held
14 (8 May 2026 – 21 July 2026)
Views total
1,667
Reactions total
94
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 17:00 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
40s
Average length
40s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
510 reactions across 14 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
294
57.6%
🥰
140
27.5%
👍
70
13.7%
👏
6
1.18%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 510reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 8 May 2026 to 21 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 14 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lenormandezoteric. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 May 2026 to 21 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Я не могу пройти мимо этого отзыва❤️❤️❤️
Наверное, самое большое счастье для преподавателя — видеть, как его ученики становятся настоящими мастерами своего дела. Сегодня уже их руки раскладывают карты Ленорман, а их знания помогают людям услышать себя, обрести ясность и найти выход даже из самых непростых жизненных ситуаций. И это для меня — лучшая награда.
Аллочка, я безумно тобой горжусь❤️ спасибо тебе за такие т…
Друзья, я помню, что обещала открыть эту группу ещё в мае.
Но тогда всё сложилось не так, как планировалось. Поэтому теперь будем нагонять! 🥳🥳🥳
Я открываю бесплатную группу по созданию и продвижению канала.
Мы не будем бесконечно готовиться, ждать вдохновения и искать идеальный момент. Мы начнём действовать вместе — шаг за шагом, под моим руководством.
В группе мы:
✨ создадим свой канал с нуля;
✨ продумаем его т…
❤️ Если сердце устало от неизвестности…
Не мучайте себя догадками и бесконечным анализом его слов и поступков.
Иногда один честный расклад способен дать больше понимания, чем месяцы ожидания.
✨ Сейчас для вас действуют специальные цены на расклады об отношениях:
❤️ Мысли • Чувства • Действия — 1200 ₽
💔 Любовный треугольник — 3000 ₽
💕 «Он-лайн Любовь» — 2000 ₽
🌹 Развитие отношений — 2500 ₽
🔮 Большой расклад Ле…
✨ Большая акция на расклады, обучение и методички! ✨
Мои хорошие, решила порадовать вас приятными ценами! 💛
Акция действует с сегодняшнего дня и до воскресенья включительно.
📖 Расклады:
🔹 1 вопрос — 400 ₽
🔹 2 вопроса — 700 ₽
🔹 3 вопроса — 900 ₽
❤️ Расклад «Мысли • Чувства • Действия» — 1000 ₽
💔 Расклад «Любовный треугольник» — 2000 ₽
🎓 Акция на базовый курс обучения Ленорман!
Курс включает:
✨ методическую рабо…
Мои хорошие, всем привет! ❤️
Хочу немного рассказать, что происходит.
Пока на канале будет небольшая пауза — ориентировочно до 15–20 июля. К сожалению, сейчас в моей жизни сложилась личная ситуация, о которой я пока не готова рассказывать. Очень надеюсь, что совсем скоро всё встанет на свои места, и я смогу вернуться к вам в привычном режиме.
Но хочу сразу вас успокоить — я никуда не пропала. ❤️
Я продолжаю работ…
Всем привет! Ловите волну классных новостей 🌊
Я знаю, что многие из вас давно присматриваются к регрессивной терапии, читают отзывы, хотят попробовать, но... цена в 12 000 рублей за сессию заставляла вас сомневаться и откладывать «на потом».
Давайте честно: «потом» не наступает никогда. Поэтому я решила убрать этот барьер и сделать вам крутой подарок!
🎁 До конца этой недели (и только!) стоимость сессии регрессии с…
✨ Ответы на расклад «Что ожидает вас этим летом?» ✨
Пришло время узнать, какое послание приготовили для вас карты. Помните, что это общий расклад, поэтому примеряйте информацию на свою ситуацию и берите то, что откликается именно вам. ❤️
🌿 1 позиция — Ключ
Лето станет для вас временем важных открытий и решений. То, что долгое время оставалось непонятным или недоступным, наконец начнет проясняться. Вы сможете найт…
Всем привет! ❤️
Ох, как же долго меня здесь не было! 🤣 Но сегодня не об этом.
От всей души поздравляю вас с первым днём лета ☀️ и Днём защиты детей! 🌸 Пусть это лето подарит вам много счастливых моментов, приятных сюрпризов, ярких впечатлений и исполнения самых заветных желаний.
По такому замечательному поводу я подготовила для вас небольшой интерактивный расклад:
✨ Что ожидает вас этим летом? ✨
Сделайте глубок…
Просили практику? Та без проблем!
Сегодня иду на мероприятие (на день рождение) и задала вопрос как пройдет для меня мероприятие?
Пишите свои варианты, а я вечером дам обратную связь)
Совмещаю практику с личным контентом😂
🔥33👍11
Signed Lina Sonechko
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @lenormandezoteric. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Создать другой личный канал. А тут все оставь как было30%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 8 May 2026 to 21 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 188,448 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Эзотерика. Ленорман. Обучение. Таро” (@lenormandezoteric), 2,077 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lenormandezoteric.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
