Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Повозка Leniniw

@leniniwtv

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

20,565subscribers

-119 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001459256026
TypeChannel
Username@leniniwtv
DescriptionЗауважте, що ТГ ведеться спільно с редактором, котрий пише свої пости російською. Це його вибір. Майже всі пости від автора каналу пишуться українською. staryitarantul@gmail.com ТГ канал призначено ВИКЛЮЧНО для осіб старше 21 року
Created3 January 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/leniniwtv

Growth

20,56520,68420,624.56 August 2026 — 20,684 subscribers6 August 2026 — 20,675 subscribers7 August 2026 — 20,659 subscribers8 August 2026 — 20,642 subscribers9 August 2026 — 20,650 subscribers10 August 2026 — 20,617 subscribers11 August 2026 — 20,586 subscribers12 August 2026 — 20,565 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net -119. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,547–20,702 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 17:2720,565-21
11 Aug 2026, 17:0220,586-31
10 Aug 2026, 14:1520,617-33
9 Aug 2026, 17:0320,650+8
8 Aug 2026, 14:2720,642-17
7 Aug 2026, 12:2620,659-16
6 Aug 2026, 11:0420,675-9
6 Aug 2026, 02:1920,684first reading

Engagement

59 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
24.5%
avg views ÷ 20,565 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,030
59 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.41%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
59
of 59 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held59 (31 July 202613 August 2026)
Views total296,990
Reactions total7,168
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 13:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
4,560
Videos
1,470
Links
2,190

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
36m 04s
Average length
1m 27s

Measured directly from 25 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

6,271 reactions across 52 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁3,15750.3%
1,49923.9%
😢76512.2%
👍3745.96%
👏1131.80%
❤‍🔥1011.61%
🤡881.40%
💩761.21%
👎280.446%
💔200.319%
😈200.319%
🥱150.239%
🐳60.096%
🤨60.096%
😐30.048%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 59 of the 59 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,168reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 59 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 59 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @leniniwtv. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 59 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 13 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 11:53 UTC≈2,050 views52 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🇫🇷 Капитан Vitality пришёл в эфир Croissant Strike (французскоязычный стрим) после стартового матча на EWC — и не стал сглаживать углы ответив на критику за проваленный BLAST Bounty. Приоритетом для команды был EWC в Париже. При этом саму игру на турнире он не оправдывает: 🇫🇷 apEX: «Обидно, тем более что мы плохо играли. У них будто крылья выросли, а мы играли как овощи — если выражаться прилично». 👶 Отдельно капит

52

13 Aug 2026, 10:31 UTC≈2,860 views238 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

👀 Аналитика, к которой стоит прислушаться? Спасибо за пост: Ez0t

👍159😁745

12 Aug 2026, 21:22 UTC≈4,170 views169 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

📊 Один из пользователей Twitter, получивших доступ к проверке матчей, просмотрел 1000 записей нового Overwatch и поделился своей статистикой (спасибо за пост: Heorhii Lorg0n) 🤮 17.5% (175/1000) — очевидные спинботтеры 🤖 4.1% (41/1000) — боты с ИИ 👁 6.4% (64/1000) — скрытые читеры с wallhack или aim assist 🙂 72% (720/1000) — обычные игроки, которых зарепортили просто потому, что соперник оказался сильнее или матч про

😁15211👍5🤡1

12 Aug 2026, 20:54 UTC≈4,050 views60 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

🗣 В ближайшее время Twitch добавит комментарии к клипам. Функция будет включена по умолчанию для всех клипов. 💬 Twitch: Комментарии к клипам уже на подходе! Реагируйте, пересматривайте и начинайте обсуждение прямо в клипах с ваших любимых моментов! Мы будем постепенно внедрять эту функцию на каналах в течение следующих нескольких недель, обеспечив все необходимые меры безопасности. Вот что вам нужно знать: Коммен

😁51👍62🐳1

12 Aug 2026, 19:20 UTC≈4,700 views262 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

♟ Российский шахматист Ян Непомнящий на турнире EWC по шахматам неудачно сдвинул мышь, что привело к миссклику и неверному ходу. 🙂 Из-за этого он проиграл и яростно начал бить по столу. 💩 Кстати, он выступает за организацию Aurora.

😁246😢93🐳2👍2

12 Aug 2026, 16:05 UTC≈4,810 views182 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

🕊 sh1ro looking like me in a Faceit match

😁1802

12 Aug 2026, 15:28 UTC≈4,520 views118 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

🇺🇸 100 шарлатанов опубликовали TeamSpeak с квалификаций на EWC, на которых им удалось совершить невероятный камбэк против BCG благодаря своему капитану Gizmy.

👍9418😢6

12 Aug 2026, 10:56 UTC≈4,630 views133 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

🥳 Внимание: данное видео может вызвать у вас счастье. 1️⃣ Ролик от лица стримера-читера, который во время игры на пистолетке получил один бан от патруля. 2️⃣ Затем он меняет аккаунт и снова получает блокировку, но уже VAC-бан. После этого он угрожает Valve, с уверенностью заявляет, что ничего плохого не сделал, и начинает смеяться как злодей из аниме. 3️⃣ И наконец он запускает игру на третьем аккаунте и снова пол

😁1197🤡7

12 Aug 2026, 10:38 UTC≈2,940 views9 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @maincasterskaPhoto

Esports World Cup 2026 буде ще гарячішим! 🔥 На цей турнір Maincast та white.market знову об’єдналися, щоб ви могли не просто дивитися матчі, а ще й перевіряти власну аналітику в Maincast x white.market Предикторі. Кожен предикт зможе наблизити вас до ножів, топових скінів, мерчу, ваучерів на 💵 та навіть джерсі 🇺🇦 NAVI з підписами гравців 👀 Все просто: прогнозуйте переможців матчів, набирайте бали та підіймайтеся в

4💩4👍1

11 Aug 2026, 15:29 UTC≈4,500 views75 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🥳 На сабреддите r/GlobalOffensive в топе несколько дней висит вопрос: ❔ u/Other_Tangelo9092: Почему киберспортивная форма так сильно обтягивает бедняг-игроков? Разве им не могут дать форму хотя бы на пару размеров больше? Каждый раз, когда я вижу профессионального игрока в CS не худощавого телосложения, мне становится его жалко — в этом же НЕВОЗМОЖНО комфортно играть или вообще носить. (Извини, karrigan, но ты мой

48😁24👍3

11 Aug 2026, 04:01 UTC≈4,980 views69 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

🚨 Ночью без громкого анонса вышло обновление в CS2, которое открыло доступ к новой версии патруля против читеров для ограниченного числа игроков. 🌐 На официальном сайте CS2 появился специальный раздел. Там избранные игроки могут смотреть демозаписи подозреваемых в браузере и оценивать их по следующим пунктам: — Aim Assist (помощь в прицеливании) — Wall Hack (просмотр сквозь стены) — Auto BHop (авто-распрыжка) — Бот

62👍5❤‍🔥2

10 Aug 2026, 18:59 UTC≈5,020 views165 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

👍 ceh9 времени зря не теряет и пересел с клавиатуры и мыши на геймпад, дабы стать профессиональным игроком в Roblox.

😁145😈11🤡62👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 59 posts we hold for @leniniwtv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@leniniwtv edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
13 August 2026
Most recent edit
13 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 127,591 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

РАЙЗ ЛАВ Ю
@raiz · 314,543
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
CS2NEWS | Counter-Strike 2
@newcsgo · 579,131
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 August 2026
Дневник Симпла
@s1mplegod123 · 249,900
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 August 2026
Лебидло
@lebigaa · 427,524
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Повозка Leniniw” (@leniniwtv), 20,565 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/leniniwtv.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.