Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
6 measurements spanning 42 days, net +17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 666–689 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 01:40
686
+2
24 Aug 2026, 03:12
684
+4
16 Aug 2026, 02:56
680
+10
8 Aug 2026, 07:38
670
+1
8 Aug 2026, 02:33
669
no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:05
669
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 10 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
45s
Average length
45s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
929 reactions across 18 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
507
54.6%
custom 5390948430593932336
108
11.6%
custom 5366469006792355316
84
9.04%
custom 5244566423203749515
77
8.29%
👎
49
5.27%
custom 5393142235464221295
44
4.74%
🔥
17
1.83%
custom 5273920677835972313
12
1.29%
custom 5274086592422617371
10
1.08%
⚡
10
1.08%
🫡
5
0.538%
custom 5462900372731337874
2
0.215%
❤
2
0.215%
custom 5469824323868958768
1
0.108%
🤬
1
0.108%
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 929 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2025 to 8 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
И ещё одна в Германии:
https://31.77.203.103:2096/sub/lenin-netclub-frunze
vless://[email protected]:59440?encryption=none&fp=chrome&pbk=b0NMjPtZuUsr_37YrAKVAEsOCNXqoSYN3Ky2lqivmVU&security=reality&sid=2e6584c6&sni=id.vk.com&spx=%2FtxP1GPDdTescTZI&type=tcp#id.vk.com%3A443-lenin-netclub-frunze
vless://[email protected]:59440?encryption=none&fp=chrome&pbk=LE92xEgAbToOwQwpTZ5aIuVgzEAndykKlVlssCmXOHE&security=reality&sid=5519005415&sni=id.vk.com&spx=%2FrFSo9TCJD3uwviF&type=tcp#tcp-59440-id.vk.com%3A443-lenin-netclub-redstar2
Еще одна нода в Нидерландах.
https://103.136.70.34:2096/sub/4v4w5w1mrvc1gtxy
☭ Товарищи, РКН продолжает борьбу с интернетом и здравым смыслом.
Настолько активно, что уже даже облачные провайдеры начинают рассылать предупреждения. Скриншот прилагается.
Некоторые наши ноды попали в чёрные списки по IP. Это хорошо видно по графику: привычный суточный трафик заметно просел.
В связи с очередным приступом цифровой цензуры подняли дополнительную ноду:
https://72.56.29.149:2096/sub/48ajd9ytwxck8e…
🚨 Товарищи, внимание: приложение «Макс» — не просто мессенджер.
В его коде обнаружен модуль HOST_REACHABILITY, который скрытно собирает: ваш внешний IP, флаг использования VPN, доступность заблокированных ресурсов (Telegram, WhatsApp, Госуслуги) и данные оператора связи. Всё это упаковывается в кастомный протокол и уходит на api.oneme.ru — без явного уведомления и без реальной необходимости для работы звонков.
Это …
Пробуем протокол Hysteria2 🚀
hysteria2://[email protected]:443/?insecure=1&sni=www.bing.com&masquerade=https://www.bing.com#Hysteria2-IP
Нужно скачать приложение Hiddify 📱. Оно поддерживает VLESS и другие протоколы.
Товарищи, небольшое обновление по серверам.
Старые профили по-прежнему работают, отключать их нет в планах.
Но! Если у вас в последнее время были просадки, обрывы или странности в работе — мы подготовили обновлённые профили с улучшенной маскировкой. Они стабильнее и надёжнее.
Новые конфиги:
Конфигурации профилей теперь больше, поэтому удобнее по ссылке: http://77.233.213.229:1917
vless://e9b66f23-7ad9-47be-a964-5…
🦸 Товарищи!
До нас доходят сообщения, что Роскомнадзор снова решил поиграть в угадай-протокол и начал прицельно душить VLESS — наш основной и самый «ненравящийся цензуре» протокол. У большинства всё по-прежнему работает нормально, но мы обязаны быть готовы к худшему сценарию.
Что важно от вас сейчас:
Если у вас внезапно начались проблемы сразу со всеми нашими нодами — не с одним конкретным сервером, а именно общее…
Нужны ли инструкции по обходу санкций? (Оплата ChatGPT и других сервисов из РФ)
Да, давай.88%
Нет, хватает просто V*N13%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @lenin_netclub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Нужны ли инструкции по обходу санкций? (Оплата ChatGPT и других сервисов из РФ)
Да, давай.88%
Нет, хватает просто V*N13%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2025 to 8 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Кружок сетевой самодеятельности им. Ленина” (@lenin_netclub), 686 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lenin_netclub.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.