Я — Лена👱🏼♀️, та самая, которая придумала фразу
«БЕСПЛАТНО то, что у других за💰»
и её стали копировать все 🤣
ЗДЕСЬ делюсь самым полезным и экономлю ваше время при создании контента❤️
РЕКЛАМА здесь ➡️ https://t.me/+MXzW6hXPzIdhZTUy
Created
Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,418–18,494 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 13:48
18,468
+5
13 Aug 2026, 01:14
18,463
+34
12 Aug 2026, 04:06
18,429
+2
11 Aug 2026, 03:16
18,427
-15
10 Aug 2026, 01:11
18,442
-9
9 Aug 2026, 01:10
18,451
-22
8 Aug 2026, 00:44
18,473
-12
7 Aug 2026, 04:30
18,485
no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:28
18,485
first reading
Engagement
28 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.02%
avg views ÷ 18,468 subscribers
Avg views / post
742
28 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
28
of 28 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held
28 (21 July 2026 – 14 August 2026)
Views total
20,766
Reactions total
633
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Aug 2026, 09:37 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,220
Videos
≈2,560
Links
≈749
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1m 35s
Average length
14s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
633 reactions across 28 posts, in 36 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
134
21.2%
👍
87
13.7%
🔥
80
12.6%
👏
59
9.32%
🥰
57
9.00%
😁
32
5.06%
💯
30
4.74%
⚡
24
3.79%
🤗
20
3.16%
🤪
11
1.74%
🤣
9
1.42%
😱
8
1.26%
🤔
8
1.26%
❤🔥
7
1.11%
👨💻
7
1.11%
😍
7
1.11%
🎉
6
0.948%
🙏
5
0.79%
🤓
5
0.79%
🤩
5
0.79%
16 further kinds
32
5.06%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 633reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 28 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lenahomochka. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 28 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 July 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
К слову про тревогу,
я поняла, что у меня стали выпадать слова из головы во время разговора! И я подумала, что это деменция..
и я купила себе книгу-тренажер с упражнениями!
💋 : очень рекомендую, кто тоже тревожится по поводу своей речи, книга ЗДЕСЬ
Я стала МЕГАтревожная 🌊
Уж не знаю, из-за чего это, НО МЕНЯ тревожит буквально всё: собачка не так дышит, надо ехать в ветеринарку, вскочила родинка — это не к добру, гроза и я сразу выключаю всю технику из розеток, потому что в дом ударит молния 🗯️
А ВЕДЬ РАНЬШЕ я такой не была..
Это возраст? внешняя обюстанвока или просто тип мышления? Тревожники отмечаемся в комменатриях и что делаете с этим, делитесь ⬇️
..сегодня в Директ пришёл вот такой запрос-напоминание🩵
Да, мы с Олегом действительно делали пошаговую инструкцию, как настраивать ответы по ключевому слову ☁️
А с вами поделиться❓
Если да, то давайте реакции и я ее здесь опубликую ⬇️
📎 рубрика ВОПРОС-ОТВЕТ
Правила простые: вы задаете любой вопрос, от самого простого до самого сложного, а я даю на него ответ.
Например:
Как наложить звук на видео? Что делать, если видео набирают 300 просмотров? Что писать в шапке ТГканала? и т.д.
Вопросы задавать здесь, пишите, все, что наболело ⬇️
Уаааааа!!! какого фарша я сегодня наделала в КЛУБЕ
Промпты для самых цепляющих каруселей! Просто берёшь и делаешь яркий контент без всяких фотографов, фотостудий, подбора луков 👯♀️
Кто уже в клубе, бегите скорее и делайте, а кто еще нет, ооооооочень рекомендую присоединиться ➡️
БОЛЬШЕ 300 промптов // готовые инструкции и шаблоны
ЯЩИТАЮ, что это знак…
Что именно 8.08 — последний день набора в мой клуб продвижения!!
Клуб, который дает реальные цифры и результаты ( посмотрите на скриншоте переписку с участниками клуба ) :
✅ рост статистики
✅ просмотры сторис
✅ реакции и комментарии от подписчиков
✅ заявки от клиентов
Если вы уже все перепробовали, но цифры по-прежнему не растут, пишите мне ➡️ @homahomochka ХОЧУ В КЛУБ и я все расскажу 😘
до…
Я сегодня завела будильник на 7:40, чтобы не проспать 8:08 ( ну вы же видели все эти Reels на тему того, что магическая дата, врата открываются, загадываем всё )
Я проснулась, но через минуту уснула обратно 😬 и проснулась только в 8:22 !
И вот у меня вопрос, как думаете, сбудется, если я загадала в 8:28?))))
И вообще, вы верите в магию чисел, волшебные врата, может у вас есть какие-то проверенные ритуалы?
ЧЕК-ЛИСТ «Как понять, что вам пора попробовать себя в SMM»
*чек-лист сформирован исходя из запросов моих учеников за 7 лет, которые я обучаю
1️⃣ вы не любите свою работу ( с ужасом ждёте понедельника и с нетерпением — пятницы, вам не нравится на работе ничего и особенно то, что вы делаете )
2️⃣ вас не устраивает ваша заработная плата, а особенно то, что вы практически не можете на неё никак влиять
3️⃣ вы не любит…
Я обожаю делиться победами своих учеников ❤️
На днях мы закончили обучение на СММспециалиста еще с одной моей ученицей из РБ ( кстати, кто интересовался, учу я только на российском рынке? Нет, у меня очень много учеников из стран СНГ, по всей Европе, в Америке и даже в Австралии ✈️ )
А знаете, почему это уже уже победа?!
Потому что как только появляются первые сложности, мы любим сливаться… А Настя не только успе…
ДАВАЙТЕ РАЗБЕРЕМСЯ..
( пришел мне коммент в инсте )
«У меня все деньги и силы брошены на развитие WB, вне WB 2 продажи..»
— давайте ещё раз объясню свою позицию! Конечно, вы можете бросать все свои силы, бюджеты и энергию только на одну площадку. Это тоже стратегия и это ваш выбор*
НО есть и другие варианты роста и продвижения, которые в перспективе могут давать гораздо больше трафика, возможности для роста и при…
А вот давайте сегодня поговорим про поддержку 🤗
Когда я начинала ( это было почти 10 лет назад ), не было вообще никакого SMM, фриланса, блогеров и, тем более, никого серьезного отношения! Все относились к этому «Да чё ты там опять в этом телефоне!»
В моей семье было ровно точно так же! Конечно, меня пытались поддерживать, но все равно ждали, когда я займусь «чем-то серьезным» и вернусь в юристы🎓 Но все изменилось,…
👍9❤4🔥3👨💻1💘1💯1🤝1🤩1
Signed lenahomochka
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @lenahomochka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 775,088 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Homochka про SMM | ПРОДВИЖЕНИЕ | ОБУЧЕНИЕ и всякие сплетни” (@lenahomochka), 18,468 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lenahomochka.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.