Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Lego_HALK

@lego_halk

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,597subscribers

-51 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002524450422
TypeChannel
Username@lego_halk
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/lego_halk

Growth

3,5973,6483,622.57 August 2026 — 3,648 subscribers8 August 2026 — 3,640 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,618 subscribers14 August 2026 — 3,597 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -51. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,589–3,656 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 21:583,597-21
11 Aug 2026, 17:173,618-22
8 Aug 2026, 16:213,640-8
7 Aug 2026, 16:463,648first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.9%
avg views ÷ 3,597 subscribers
Avg views / post
572
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.89%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held15 (4 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total8,577
Reactions total505
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 22:58 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

505 reactions across 15 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥12825.3%
12324.4%
👍9118.0%
😁346.73%
🤩326.34%
❤‍🔥316.14%
😢234.55%
👏91.78%
🤣61.19%
🤪61.19%
🤯40.792%
🆒30.594%
😱30.594%
🥴30.594%
20.396%
👾20.396%
🤝20.396%
🗿10.198%
🥰10.198%
🦄10.198%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 505reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 15:04 UTC294 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Любителям футбола очень рекомендую зайти в ДМ в Авиапарке, Виниуса Жаниора вообще продают ниже озоновского рынка! 🇧🇷 Да и есть сеты, на которых стоит очень выгодный ценник) Я бы себе тоже что-нибудь из этих сетов взял, вот только все они у меня есть…👍 P.s. Кроме Жуниора, кстати. Но он мне не нужен :)

17

7 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTC423 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Про что я и говорил в прошлом кружке: «в детском мире можно что-нибудь купить по более менее приемлемой цене!»👂 На озоне он стоит ровно столько же, только здесь ты пришел, кайфанул и купил набор оффлайн! 🍁 Но нет, обязательно нужно наклеить огромную хрень на всю коробку. На которой написано, что набор вам прослужит максимум 10 лет и прочий бред….Ааа, ну зачем так делать, ещё и на лицевой части?! 🤬 Но нельзя не отм

❤‍🔥154👏3🔥3👍2

7 Aug 2026, 09:44 UTC420 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

👍14🆒3❤‍🔥2🤩1

6 Aug 2026, 17:08 UTC530 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Я только сейчас узнал про Комик кон в Астане… Он проходит с 7 по 9 августа! Дааа, не выполнить три важные цели это плохо. Даже очень. На фильм не попал, ещё и комик кон просрал… Хорошо, что хоть в Москву поехал, хоть Астана была бы гораааздо выигрышней. Эх, ну ладно. Надеюсь, что в следующем году он тоже будет проходить и я наконец смогу съездить в Казахстан :) P.s. Кто будет на комик коне, присылайте в чат фотогр

😢235🤝1

6 Aug 2026, 13:51 UTC546 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Кто-нибудь ещё хотел себе этот Геликарриер? 😄 Я не хотел и всё ещё не хочу, ну а за 73к… Хмммм… А это интересно! 👍 Всегда было интересно, как работает это ценообразование. Не в том плане, что это в 2 раза дороже рынка, а почему именно 72699 руб? Они прибавляют к его РРЦ свой ЦДМ-процент?! Видимо, как-то так это и работает :)

👍26❤‍🔥3🤩21🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 11:40 UTC534 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🤩24🔥4👏2

6 Aug 2026, 08:25 UTC601 views45 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

«Ради этого фильма действительно стоило сдвигать Человека-паука на две недели!» 😊 Обстановка по заполняемости мест в кинотеатре «Каро» в «Авиапарке» утром, днём, вечером и ночью выглядит как-то так: ⏳ Самое забавное, что для самих кинотеатров сдвиг «Паука» на две недели, мягко говоря, не очень в тему. А если говорить прямо, то из-за этого они теряют деньги. К слову, Нет пути домой в 2021 собрал в районе 5 миллиард

😁30🤣632❤‍🔥1👍1🤝1🦄1

5 Aug 2026, 19:04 UTC571 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥22❤‍🔥4🤪31🤩1🥰1

5 Aug 2026, 12:46 UTC635 views42 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вот теперь и ДУМАй…💚🏛️ Странно, почему я в ноябре 2025 такую фотографию не догадался сделать?…😭 Сейчас резко вспомнилась сцена из новой фантастической четвёрки, где Дум просто не пришёл на заседание ООН))) Помните ведь? 🟢 P.s. Ох уж эти путешественники из Латверии, с ними нужно быть поосторожнее :)

🔥35🤩3❤‍🔥21🗿1

5 Aug 2026, 08:24 UTC622 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

В этот раз в Москву я взял с собой довольно мало фигурок…🤦‍♀️ Вы спросите: почему же? А я отвечу: я хочу что-нибудь из ♥️ здесь купить (а-ля самовывозом)! Например: в ближайшее время, возможно, я тут куплю у продавца распак Особняк Людей-Икс! ❌ Также есть фигурки, которые я просто ищу, такие как: новый марки ЖЧ, нуар-паук, фигурки по черепашкам ниндзя (Эйприл, Бакстер и так далее) 🕵️‍♂️ Если у кого-нибудь что-ни

22👏3🔥2👾1

4 Aug 2026, 17:42 UTC684 views67 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

КАКАЯ ФОТОГРАФИЯ НА ФОНЕ КРЕМЛЯ КРУЧЕ? 🟢 Я в Москву взял всю команду из нового фильма про паучка! Первый вариант — мой) 🥇 Второй — Блока)))🤔 Я особо с постановкой не фантазировал, а вот Блок… Помогите нам решить, какой вариант композиции круче :) Голосуем реакциями! 👇 ♥️— Мой вариант (верхний) 👍— Вариант Блока (нижний) P.s. Голосуем честно!

👍4714🔥3🥴3

4 Aug 2026, 15:25 UTC655 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Наконец-то я его увидел! 😩 Разумеется, кубок ЧМ может быть только в московском мире очень дорогих кубиков :) Хотели бы себе такой? 🙂

🔥32🤯42👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @lego_halk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 501,504 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Lego_HALK” (@lego_halk), 3,597 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lego_halk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.