Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Legist 🌍

Channel

Legist 🌍

@legist7

Not marked by Telegram, checked 14 August 2026

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,732subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002234633314
TypeChannel
Username@legist7
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/legist7

Growth

3,7263,7353,730.57 August 2026 — 3,726 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,726 subscribers8 August 2026 — 3,727 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,731 subscribers14 August 2026 — 3,727 subscribers17 August 2026 — 3,732 subscribers24 August 2026 — 3,735 subscribers28 August 2026 — 3,732 subscribers3,7327 August 202628 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 20 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,725–3,736 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 01:323,732-3
24 Aug 2026, 20:233,735+3
17 Aug 2026, 13:253,732+5
14 Aug 2026, 13:443,727-4
11 Aug 2026, 07:363,731+4
8 Aug 2026, 13:193,727+1
7 Aug 2026, 19:023,726no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:543,726first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
38.9%
avg views ÷ 3,732 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,450
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.64%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (4 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total29,000
Reactions total1,346
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 06:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,346 reactions across 20 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁35426.3%
👍30122.4%
custom 536875318636448152024618.3%
1198.84%
🤣1067.88%
🍌836.17%
🔥272.01%
👏181.34%
💊151.11%
👌110.817%
💯70.52%
👎60.446%
❤‍🔥50.371%
👀50.371%
🤔50.371%
🥰50.371%
😎40.297%
🤝40.297%
custom 531667943090973252130.223%
🍓30.223%
11 further kinds191.41%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,346reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
357
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 20 we hold a reading for · 60%
Most on one post
51
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @legist7. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 16:44 UTC≈1,070 views99 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Редакция канала Легист приносит искренние извинения за ненамеренное введение в заблуждение аудитории. Миллиард деревьев был посажен ещё в прошлом году! Благодарим зрителя Barometrrr за бдительность!

😁43🤣403🏆3custom 53687531863644815203💊2🔥2🥰1

7 Aug 2026, 13:08 UTC≈1,200 views60 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Уже менее чем через час будем рады встрече! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=10WWhdOSj4w

👍35custom 536875318636448152013🔥62💋2💊1🥰1

6 Aug 2026, 11:47 UTC≈1,400 views51 reactions50 Starsread 8 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GplLUcYp52U

👍26custom 53687531863644815209🔥63👏3👌2💊1🥰1

6 Aug 2026, 11:20 UTC≈1,400 views57 reactions50 Starsread 8 August 2026

Трижды Доктор философии! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rZ-kQMFzB5Y

👍29custom 536875318636448152010😁6❤‍🔥5👎32😱2

6 Aug 2026, 08:26 UTC≈1,410 views42 reactions51 Starsread 8 August 2026

Хотіли СЕНСАЦІЮ, так ТРИМАЙТЕ! ))) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hcXbile_QwE

custom 53687531863644815201816👍3💊3👌2

6 Aug 2026, 06:02 UTC≈1,420 views106 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Пока Андрей Валериевич думает о великом, я расстраиваюсь: выехал на электричке, а взял бы дизель - заправился б бесплатно, наверное акция какая-то сегодня (

😁66🤣21custom 536875318636448152013💊2💯21🍾1

6 Aug 2026, 05:46 UTC≈1,390 views46 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Хто анонсував підтримку і просування Умерова однопартійцями? (Звісно Легіст) Які розвідувальні ознаки цього постеру? До завершення року має бути оголошено нового 007. Такої ґрунтовною підготовка до ролі агента нашого 100-літнього партнера світ ще не бачив!

😁34custom 53687531863644815207💯41

5 Aug 2026, 15:31 UTC≈1,450 views71 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://youtu.be/F1diYLhdb4A?is=9CQ4dGjUQBwRmxBH

30👍24custom 536875318636448152013🍌2👌1🤔1

5 Aug 2026, 15:20 UTC≈1,430 views74 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026

Добрый вечер! По хронометражу, рекорд, не побоюсь этого слова! https://youtu.be/pqhypjW6cBA?si=mmU-emuHMN62O089

👍4013custom 536875318636448152010😁4👎3🍌1🔥1🥰1

5 Aug 2026, 13:07 UTC≈1,430 views43 reactions50 Starsread 8 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0wYTt_Bn6dA

custom 5368753186364481520228👀5🤝3👍2🤔2💊1

5 Aug 2026, 11:27 UTC≈1,470 views59 reactions50 Starsread 8 August 2026

Поставки антибаллистики от партнеров сократились втрое, если сравнивать с 2025 годом. А количество ведущих на хмельницком телевидении - вдвое, если сравнивать с прошлым эфиром. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3BqKCBqbTL4

😁22👍18custom 53687531863644815208🤣42👌2🔥2💊1

4 Aug 2026, 15:11 UTC≈1,570 views78 reactionsread 8 August 2026

А почему Балканы? Я что кусочек нагнутой, со слов Олега Ивановича, раком, Испании не заслужил?

😁48👏15custom 53687531863644815207🔥4🍌1💊1🤝1😎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @legist7. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Бондаренко: Былое и Думы
@kost1969 · 83,498
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 August 2026
ШЕЛЕСТ
@shelestlive · 137,948
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Legist 🌍” (@legist7), 3,732 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/legist7.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.