https://youtube.com/shorts/gf-6-QfJsLQ?is=LxB2m0m8UenEyB99
❤1

Channel
@legalflyYT
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
146subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001917946916 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @legalflyYT |
| Created | 8 June 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/legalflyYT |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 25 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Oct 2026, 21:40 | 146 | -2 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 07:16 | 148 | +2 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 23:57 | 146 | -3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 01:18 | 149 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:01 | 150 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:50 | 150 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 8 June 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
19 reactions across 9 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 12 | 63.2% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 26.3% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 10.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2023 to 27 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://youtube.com/shorts/gf-6-QfJsLQ?is=LxB2m0m8UenEyB99
❤1
New video coming up soon… https://youtu.be/J3YcW6ryFHA
Our most requested video, Rule of Law in India, is live for members today and will be made public in a few days. If these videos have been helpful in your preparation, consider becoming a member to gain early access to all our content and support our efforts to create more. Members, let us know what you think! https://youtu.be/Kn7ThI6eq94
👍1
and we’re back… https://youtu.be/1BOWWzqANv4
❤3
In 2017, India's Supreme Court struck down the controversial triple talaq (instant divorce) practice in Shayara Bano v. Union of India. This custom allowed Muslim men to divorce their wives by simply saying "talaq" three times. The court declared it unconstitutional, protecting Muslim women's rights to equality and personal liberty. 👩⚖️⚖️ This landmark ruling balanced religious customs with constitutional rights, a…
❤2
In 2018, the Supreme Court of India delivered a landmark ruling in Indian Young Lawyers Association v. State of Kerala, lifting the ban on women's entry into Sabarimala Temple. The petition by young lawyers ignited a national conversation on religious freedom, gender equality, and constitutional rights. ⚖️ This historic verdict was celebrated as a major victory for women's rights but also sparked widespread protest…
👍2
Have you heard of the Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan case? It's a landmark judgment that changed the landscape of workplace sexual harassment laws in India. 🔍 In 1997, the Supreme Court laid down the Vishaka Guidelines to address the absence of domestic laws prohibiting sexual harassment at work. This judgment was a game-changer, setting legal precedents and influencing global legal systems. 💡 Intrigued? Click the l…
❤2
Have you ever wondered how a single legal case can transform workplace rights for an entire gender? 🤔 The Air India v. Nargesh Mirza case did just that, challenging discriminatory practices and gender norms head-on. This landmark case not only redefined corporate policies but also set a precedent for gender equality in Indian workplaces. But what exactly transpired, and how did this case shape the evolution of gende…
❤3
In 2018, #LGBTQ rights in India changed dramatically. 🏳️🌈 The Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India case challenged Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, criminalizing homosexuality. The Supreme Court's verdict struck down Section 377, decriminalizing consensual same-sex relations, a milestone for LGBTQ+ rights and aligning India with international norms. The journey involved complex legal arguments and the Supreme…
👏2
🧐 What if a life-sentence prisoner committed murder while serving their term? Should they automatically face the death penalty, no questions asked? In 1983, the Supreme Court tackled this controversial issue in the landmark case of Mithu v. State of Punjab. The judgment struck down the draconian Section 303 of the Indian Penal Code, which mandated capital punishment for such offenders without allowing judicial discr…
👍2❤1
Channel created
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @legalflyYT. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LegalFly” (@legalflyYT), 146 subscribers as measured 7 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/legalflyYT.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.