Channel
@leftistunity
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,616subscribers
+28 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002049543182 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @leftistunity |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/leftistunity |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:18 | 1,616 | +6 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:54 | 1,610 | +22 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:45 | 1,588 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:38 | 1,588 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (31 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,865 |
| Reactions total | 110 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:59 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
102 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 30 | 29.4% | |
| 🤡 | 29 | 28.4% | |
| 😁 | 14 | 13.7% | |
| 👍 | 13 | 12.7% | |
| 💯 | 9 | 8.82% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 6.86% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 110reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Am I wrong tho Idk about yall but I don't think gatekeeping starting/staffing fur cons & furmeets to suspiciously wealthy privileged Furries is a good idea considering when most have overinflated egos who are more concerned about flexing the power they have instead of serving their attendees & the Fandom
👍12
Israeli 'left': you can't feed Muslims to crocodiles! That's animal abuse! Note: I24 is an Israeli news channel, this is their reporting.
🤡16
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
❤7
Will Will Will Will We said we will win the MI-7 Democratic primary in mid Michigan as the only non mid candidate & now we will toss out MAGA "moderate" Tom Barrett this November @wewill2026.bsky.social @sunrisemvmt.bsky.social Alt text Democrats PROJECTED WINNER WILLIAM LAWRENCE WINS THE MICHIGAN PRIMARY Candidate Votes Percentage William Lawrence 27,414 42.7% Bridget Brink 18,956 29.5% Matt Maasdam 17,878 27.8% 52.…
❤7
"The problem with left leaning media is they're [...] only using verifiable sources" 😁
😁14
https://www.currentaffairs.org/news/israels-rave-music-drowns-out-the-sound-of-its-victims
🤡2👍1
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/04/magazine/trump-rfk-steak-kimchi-diet.html?unlocked_article_code=1.21A.ymed.OyFVP85xWyNK&smid=nytcore-ios-share
🤡11
I'm sorry but since I had to see it everyone else has to as well https://ground.news/article/sen-bernie-moreno-says-former-son-in-law-max-miller-shouldnt-serve-in-congress-following-abuse-allegations
❤5
Photo, posted without a caption
💯9
Anyone can draw change my mind Someone should make an edit of Auguste Gusteau from Ratatouille saying "You must try things that may not work, & you must not let anyone define your limits because of where you come from. ... Anyone can draw, but only the fearless can be great." whenever tech bros claim AI will allow anyone to draw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v9JTgpk1hXs
❤3
Yall know who you are 💅 It says a lot when artists who used to live to create now have to create to live because it's impossible to live off 1 full time job (if you can even 40 hours or any work at all) & need multiple side hustles to even get by but the tech bros training AI to automate this work would never understand
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @leftistunity. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 241,266 of 1,084,084entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
@leftistunity named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Queer, Leftist, AntiFascist Unity 🔞” (@leftistunity), 1,616 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/leftistunity.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.