8 measurements spanning 8 days, net -101. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,935–18,068 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 04:57
17,950
-5
12 Aug 2026, 21:15
17,955
-7
11 Aug 2026, 18:22
17,962
-12
10 Aug 2026, 19:11
17,974
-12
8 Aug 2026, 19:39
17,986
-22
7 Aug 2026, 19:12
18,008
-45
6 Aug 2026, 16:11
18,053
+2
6 Aug 2026, 08:19
18,051
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 16 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
55.0%
avg views ÷ 17,950 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,880
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
20 (16 June 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
79,040
Reactions total
8,546
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Aug 2026, 10:16 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
613
Videos
31
Links
90
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
20,852 reactions across 18 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
11,111
53.3%
❤🔥
4,731
22.7%
🔥
1,522
7.30%
🌭
1,062
5.09%
🕊
726
3.48%
🤯
694
3.33%
🥰
265
1.27%
👀
225
1.08%
🎄
113
0.542%
💅
112
0.537%
👎
66
0.317%
😨
49
0.235%
😭
36
0.173%
💔
33
0.158%
💩
30
0.144%
🥱
27
0.129%
👌
15
0.072%
👻
11
0.053%
🌚
10
0.048%
🤓
10
0.048%
1 further kind
4
0.019%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24,470reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
очень люблю на пляжах продолжать свои попытки изучать бодимеханику динамику анатомию и иногда скетчу отдыхающих и всем советую, потому что:
1) чаще всего они не двигаются (лежат сидят стоят)
2) все в купальниках и плавках так что разнообразие фигур и типажей видно очень хорошо
3) люди не позируют и максимально естественны, много прикольных ситуаций
4) (Бонус) время летит очень быстро и можно успеть загореть
Из м…
зачем вы сюда подписались? какой контент хотите видеть вообще?
подписан только ради дмо и доп контента по нему73%
подписан ради около-фениксовского контента31%
подписан типа нууу типа как на инсту типа фотки смотреть сторисы там46%
подписан ради внутряка индустрии анимации и около того53%
а реально не знаю, надо отписаться10%
подписан чтобы НЕНАВИДЕТЬ (я победила)5%
The shares total 218%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🐶 АААААА ТРЕЙЛЕР 3-ГО СЕЗОНА!!1!!
https://youtu.be/Tn7Ys4jhgQs
Уже 1-го сентября в Okko выйдет первая серия ТРЕТЬЕГО СЕЗОНА:
https://okko.tv/serial/shurik-i-sharik
А пока посмотрите трейлер, там очень важная информация (ОЧЕНЬ ВАЖНАЯ)
Тизер "Кангура" в тиктоке набрал более полумиллиона просмотров за первые сутки!
И это еще без учета ролика на Ютубе, на котором набралось более 20 тысяч просмотров.
🎙 Огромное спасибо всем вам! Нам сейчас очень важно, чтобы с "Кангуром" познакомилось как можно больше людей. Так у сериала будет больше шансов выйти на свет! 📻
#Кангур
Блин друзья я надеюсь вы меня просите 😭😭😭
В общем, мы вчера подписывали фотокарточки-подарки для тех кто предзаказал мерч по «Духу» иии… Подписывать пришлось ТАК много, что…. 😖
Простите, но я изменил свой автограф!!! 😣 Коллеги давно советовали сделать его покороче, но все как-то думал что это всех запутает, уже начал вроде оставлять длинный… Но тут я правда сдался - ОЧЕНЬ много было подписывать 🤕
Так что если вам в п…
Спасибо всем большое за «Гнездо»! Очень по-доброму все прошло, надеюсь никого не потеснили слишком сильно и все успели всё что хотели) зарядилась очень сильно и готова работать дальше!
Покидайте фоток в комментах, у кого есть!!
Где-где? На Гнезде
Буду ждать москвичей (и тех кто тут проездом тоже!) сегодня с 11 до закрытия за столом 150 с небольшим лимитированным количеством мерча по #дмо, которого еще нет в открытой продаже.
Надеюсь, увидимся!!
это мой первый маркет в жизни как автора, уже вчера на застройке узнала много нового о том как НЕ надо делать стенды… но применить эти знания я смогу только на следующих маркетах, если они будут… пр…
❤819🔥240❤🔥177🥰35😭26💅8🌚6🌭6
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @leenakilling. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
зачем вы сюда подписались? какой контент хотите видеть вообще?
подписан только ради дмо и доп контента по нему73%
подписан ради около-фениксовского контента31%
подписан типа нууу типа как на инсту типа фотки смотреть сторисы там46%
подписан ради внутряка индустрии анимации и около того53%
а реально не знаю, надо отписаться10%
подписан чтобы НЕНАВИДЕТЬ (я победила)5%
The shares total 218%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 352,315 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Metalfamily официальный канал @metalfamily_news · 222,566 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Лина пытается” (@leenakilling), 17,950 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/leenakilling.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
