Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for лерок о моде

Channel

лерок о моде

@leeeeeerock

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry

9,716subscribers

+326 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001711206856
TypeChannel
Username@leeeeeerock
Description@lilin_prod сотрудничество
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/leeeeeerock

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

9,3909,8719,630.57 August 2026 — 9,390 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,390 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,404 subscribers13 August 2026 — 9,579 subscribers16 August 2026 — 9,669 subscribers19 August 2026 — 9,786 subscribers22 August 2026 — 9,861 subscribers25 August 2026 — 9,871 subscribers28 August 2026 — 9,852 subscribers31 August 2026 — 9,854 subscribers9 September 2026 — 9,845 subscribers13 September 2026 — 9,843 subscribers16 September 2026 — 9,831 subscribers2 October 2026 — 9,749 subscribers9 October 2026 — 9,733 subscribers14 October 2026 — 9,717 subscribers16 October 2026 — 9,701 subscribers20 October 2026 — 9,682 subscribers23 October 2026 — 9,701 subscribers26 October 2026 — 9,697 subscribers28 October 2026 — 9,688 subscribers1 November 2026 — 9,673 subscribers4 November 2026 — 9,708 subscribers7 November 2026 — 9,707 subscribers11 November 2026 — 9,716 subscribers9,7167 August 202611 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 96 days, net +326. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,318–9,943 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 00:169,716+9
7 Nov 2026, 10:519,707-1
4 Nov 2026, 03:169,708+35
1 Nov 2026, 01:599,673-15
28 Oct 2026, 16:079,688-9
26 Oct 2026, 02:179,697-4
23 Oct 2026, 08:319,701+19
20 Oct 2026, 03:389,682-19
16 Oct 2026, 20:399,701-16
14 Oct 2026, 00:209,717-16
9 Oct 2026, 02:579,733-16
2 Oct 2026, 14:589,749-82
16 Sept 2026, 22:189,831-12
13 Sept 2026, 09:159,843-2
9 Sept 2026, 21:379,845-9
31 Aug 2026, 17:559,854+2
28 Aug 2026, 08:189,852-19
25 Aug 2026, 09:119,871+10
22 Aug 2026, 19:099,861+75
19 Aug 2026, 11:259,786first reading

Engagement

36 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.3%
avg views ÷ 9,716 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,560
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.32%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 36 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held36 (29 July 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total33,280
Reactions total2,437
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 11:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,160
Videos
≈95
Links
≈66

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

5,893 reactions across 36 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤3,51359.6%
❤‍🔥1,69228.7%
👍68811.7%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,893 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 13 posts held from the last 30 days (7.69%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 08:40 UTC≈1,310 views161 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Когда у меня плохое настроение я всегда включаю «Городских девчонок», погружает в детство, напоминает о балансе внутреннего ребенка и взрослого и конечно же ради Британии Мерфи и ее фитов, у нее кстати сегодня день рождения, ей могло бы быть 49 лет

❤104❤‍🔥41👍16

8 Nov 2026, 08:45 UTC≈2,110 views185 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Черт манекены могут тоже быть красивыми…

❤‍🔥92❤75👍18

7 Nov 2026, 14:07 UTC≈2,310 views144 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Как всегда советую вам здесь «плохое» кино но с афигенным погружением в контекст времени. Йоганутые 2016 года. Оч крутой визуал и идеально переданная поп-культура крутейшей эпохи. Учу вас искать свег.

❤108❤‍🔥36

5 Nov 2026, 15:11 UTC≈2,520 views159 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

Тейлор Свифт в показном худи ss17 BALENCIAGA airbrush NYC

❤‍🔥73❤66👍20

4 Nov 2026, 09:05 UTC≈3,090 views218 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

Just feel her

❤124❤‍🔥80👍14

3 Nov 2026, 08:28 UTC≈3,630 views205 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

«О чем думала сегодня» да так…

❤111❤‍🔥64👍30

1 Nov 2026, 09:02 UTC≈3,090 views322 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Let women look like women

❤177❤‍🔥107👍38

1 Nov 2026, 08:38 UTC≈3,320 views309 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Мне перестала нравиться мода на анерексичность. Да, сама долгое время не могла смотреть в отражение не видя там выпирающих костей и облезлой от изнеможения кожи, после набранного в результате стресса веса. Но сейчас, сбросив действительно лишнее кг и оставив все же при этом жировую и мышечную ткань, я принимаю себя и свое здоровое тело, каждый день стараясь выстраивать с ним какой-то адекватный диалог. Это трудно, но…

❤194❤‍🔥85👍30

31 Oct 2026, 17:10 UTC≈2,770 views171 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Не могу перетать думать об этих шапках-ушанках с показа миу миу зима 26/27

❤106❤‍🔥42👍23

31 Oct 2026, 14:25 UTC≈2,120 views170 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

Просто захотелось поделиться с вами.

❤94❤‍🔥60👍16

30 Oct 2026, 10:38 UTC≈2,470 views150 reactionsread 3 November 2026

Худшее что могли сделать с конверсами это добавить в них платформу….

❤109❤‍🔥26👍15

Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @leeeeeerock. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 9 posts on @leeeeeerock as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
15 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
9 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
3 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
4

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“лерок о моде” (@leeeeeerock), 9,716 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/leeeeeerock.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.