Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Последний Крестоносец

@lederniercroise

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,829subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001722835687
TypeChannel
Username@lederniercroise
Created24 August 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/lederniercroise

Growth

1,8291,8331,8316 August 2026 — 1,833 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,833 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,830 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,829 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,828–1,834 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 21:541,829-1
9 Aug 2026, 11:331,830-3
6 Aug 2026, 11:321,833no change
6 Aug 2026, 11:031,833first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 12 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.7%
avg views ÷ 1,829 subscribers
Avg views / post
325
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.74%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held23 (12 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total6,166
Reactions total169
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

235 reactions across 23 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥12452.8%
👍2410.2%
💯208.51%
114.68%
👌114.68%
😁114.68%
🤔83.40%
🌚72.98%
❤‍🔥41.70%
👏41.70%
🤡31.28%
🤪31.28%
20.851%
👀10.426%
👎10.426%
😱10.426%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 235reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 20:57 UTC163 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Kompot_KnightsPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥6❤‍🔥2

6 Aug 2026, 20:57 UTC170 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

100 гигабайт книг по истории на жёстком диске...

🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 15:18 UTC229 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Они трогательно стерли мой коммент. Нет чтобы подискутировать о сагах и Титмаре Мерзебургском. 😂

😁11🤡1

6 Aug 2026, 15:13 UTC221 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

В церковные кругах это не очень любят. Когда один князь заказал двух других князей, пусть и братьев, это жестоко, но понятно. Но, когда один канонизированный святой заказал двух других возникает некая психологическая проблема. 😂

🌚7👍3

6 Aug 2026, 14:25 UTC236 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Все-таки админ очень нехороший человек. Сегодня день памяти князей Бориса и Глеба. И он не удержался и откомментировал в одном месте, где весь текст был основан на ПВЛ и житии, что глубоко почитавший их Ярослав, видимо, их сам и заказал. А Святополк Окаянный, судя по всему, в этот момент был в Польше у тестя, собирал войска для дальнейшей борьбы. Вот такой админ вредный.

👌11👏3👀1🤡1

6 Aug 2026, 10:05 UTC244 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Тут я ознакомился с разбором Клима Александровича Жукова учебника по военной истории от Мединского и компании от 2019 года. И должен сказать, что разбор хороший - вопросов нет. А вот учебник, видимо, просто жуткого качества. Разбор легко ищется. Я воспользовался у коллеги в Вк ссылкой на Дзен.

🤔6🔥2

5 Aug 2026, 16:18 UTC255 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Интересные отсылки у Фулька Нерры на Псевдо-Дионисия Ареопагита? Подробнее узнаете, когда напишу пост. Пока готовлю. 😊

🔥5

4 Aug 2026, 15:04 UTC265 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#книги@lederniercroise На русском вышла классическая работа Жоржа Дюби "Рыцарь, женщина и священник". 1981 года. Работа посвящена институту брака в Средневековой Франции. Издано АСТ, что пугает. Я её частично читал на французском, ибо на полке есть. Рекомендуется к прочтению.

👍10🔥1

4 Aug 2026, 14:57 UTC227 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @vma_journalPhoto

В начале последнего летнего месяца рады представить вам новый номер журнала! Гуляйте, загорайте, читайте интересное! 9–11 | Мария Андреевна Зенкова Intro DISCIPLINA I 13–40 | Станислав Григорьевич Мереминский Конструирование образа античности в историописании «Возрождения XII века» («Abbreviationes chronicarum» Ральфа де Дицето) 41–65 | Павел Назимович Новрузов, Мария Андреевна Волконская He was þe wiseste man: «

2👏1🔥1

4 Aug 2026, 08:07 UTC248 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Тут у нас вчера был яффский десант Ричарда Львиное Сердце 3 августа 1192 года. Но там надо разобраться подробно. На статью.

🔥11

1 Aug 2026, 10:10 UTC351 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @studiabellorum

Друзья и коллеги, добрый день! Представляем вашему вниманию запись конференции «Превратности войны: провидение, удача и случай в военном деле в Средние века и раннее Новое время», состоявшейся 19-20 июня 2025 г. в ИВИ РАН. Записи всех сессий конференции можно найти в этом плейлисте: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLeFHwqJyJD_U&si=NFGrjULE4IIHM9ub Ссылка на ютуб-канал семинара: https://youtube.com/@studiabelloru

2🔥1

30 Jul 2026, 07:24 UTC360 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @iusadhistoriam

Рабочее, записи ===== Дело, конечно, уже давнее, но ведь грех не поделиться. Я достаточно регулярно появляюсь на радио, в программе "История. Изъявительное наклонение", которую ведёт мой друг, журналист и историк Алексей Штейнбух. Программу я искренне рекомендую всем - там всегда бывают интересные люди, которые умеют и любят рассказывать о разных исторических сюжетах. Вот здесь и здесь, например, лежат две части на

🔥3👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @lederniercroise. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 834,878 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Последний Крестоносец” (@lederniercroise), 1,829 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lederniercroise.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.