Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Lectvis

Channel

Lectvis

@lectvi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Cite this entry

354subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002071054617
TypeChannel
Username@lectvi
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/lectvi

Growth

347354350.57 August 2026 — 350 subscribers8 August 2026 — 350 subscribers16 August 2026 — 347 subscribers22 August 2026 — 354 subscribers7 August 202622 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 15 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 346–355 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 20:46354+7
16 Aug 2026, 03:34347-3
8 Aug 2026, 06:48350no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:04350first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 11 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
65.0%
avg views ÷ 354 subscribers
Avg views / post
230
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
16.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 9 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held9 (11 July 20261 August 2026)
Views total690
Reactions total111
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 06:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 25s
Average length
36s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

314 reactions across 9 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥14144.9%
🔥8326.4%
custom 51995230095215248283310.5%
😱319.87%
custom 5217431764720428656134.14%
custom 5323470315370585285134.14%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 314reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
21
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 9 we hold a reading for · 78%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lectvi. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 July 2026 to 1 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 11:14 UTC138 views36 reactions5 Starsread 8 August 2026
Video

Shot on iPhone — Субботняя рутина как есть 🤭

❤‍🔥17🔥11custom 53234703153705852858

27 Jul 2026, 13:16 UTC274 views47 reactions6 Starsread 8 August 2026
Video

🥰

❤‍🔥26😱11🔥8custom 51995230095215248282

24 Jul 2026, 13:01 UTC278 views28 reactions6 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Новая реальность автомобильной культуры — Не секрет что я занимаюсь съемками и пост-продакшеном больших выпуском для Ютуба и других платформ Но в этот раз мы с моей командой подошли к реализации совсем иначе и более масштабно Приятного просмотра ❤️

❤‍🔥12🔥9😱6custom 52174317647204286561

22 Jul 2026, 14:48 UTC262 views23 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Пора бы уже, да? — https://lectvis.art

custom 519952300952152482811🔥7😱5

21 Jul 2026, 15:38 UTC237 views40 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Done ✅ — Давно что-то не было лайва, поэтому закину еще его на днях , есть чем поделиться и что показать🤭 Наконец-то не будет удивления когда узнают что снимают машины, а сам без прав🤪

🔥21❤‍🔥8😱7custom 53234703153705852854

20 Jul 2026, 13:15 UTC223 views31 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

BMW X2 M35i — details

❤‍🔥21custom 51995230095215248286🔥4

14 Jul 2026, 19:31 UTC313 views31 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

X2 M35i На просторах малой родины

❤‍🔥17🔥8custom 51995230095215248284custom 52174317647204286561custom 53234703153705852851

13 Jul 2026, 13:56 UTC317 views39 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥22custom 521743176472042865611🔥4😱2

11 Jul 2026, 09:41 UTC339 views39 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

M5

❤‍🔥18🔥11custom 519952300952152482810

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @lectvi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Lectvis” (@lectvi), 354 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lectvi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.