International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far below this size band
87.3 average views per post against 129,961 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.067%. Across the 582 registered channels in the same cohort — 100,034–311,185 subscribers, posting mainly in Arabic — the middle half sit between 1.23% and 10.4%, with a median of 3.71%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured
93 of 93 published in the window (93 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
8,121
Mature posts only
0.072% over 70 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
64 measurements spanning 95 days, net -9,988. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 127,894–140,878 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 12:57
129,392
-130
9 Nov 2026, 03:49
129,522
-118
7 Nov 2026, 23:18
129,640
-118
6 Nov 2026, 23:38
129,758
-80
6 Nov 2026, 02:26
129,838
-123
4 Nov 2026, 23:14
129,961
-100
3 Nov 2026, 21:56
130,061
-135
2 Nov 2026, 20:08
130,196
-119
1 Nov 2026, 17:50
130,315
-144
31 Oct 2026, 15:09
130,459
-98
30 Oct 2026, 13:48
130,557
-141
29 Oct 2026, 11:10
130,698
-100
28 Oct 2026, 10:14
130,798
-133
27 Oct 2026, 10:14
130,931
-84
26 Oct 2026, 13:28
131,015
-38
25 Oct 2026, 11:50
131,053
-82
24 Oct 2026, 13:48
131,135
-79
23 Oct 2026, 14:20
131,214
-95
22 Oct 2026, 13:35
131,309
-180
21 Oct 2026, 06:18
131,489
first reading
Engagement
232 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 194 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.071%
avg views ÷ 129,392 subscribers
Avg views / post
92.0
86 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.60%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
86
of 232 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 64 of 86 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held
232 (3 August 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total
7,913
Reactions total
98
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 04:00 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,420
Videos
≈483
Links
≈2
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 23m
Average length
1m 28s
Measured directly from 57 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
264 reactions across 164 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😢
214
81.1%
❤
43
16.3%
🤬
4
1.52%
👍
2
0.758%
🔥
1
0.379%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 165 of the 232 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 264 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 232 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 86 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
اضطر برنامج الأغذية العالمي بغزة إلى تقليص مساعداته الغذائية بنحو الثلث، وترك نصف مليون شخص دون دعم، محذرًا من انعدام الأمن الغذائي نهاية العام الحالي.
القطاع الذي يعيش أزمة معيشية خانقة بصمت، ما الذي ينتظر سكانه بعد هذا التحذير، وهل سيحتمل عودة المجاعة من جديد؟
مع كل منخفض جوي، تتكرر مشاهد غرق خيام النازحين في قطاع غزة، رغم التحذيرات الأممية المتواصلة منذ سنوات من مخاطر الأمطار والغمر البحري وانهيار البنية التحتية، فقد وثّقت دراسات سابقة تعرض آلاف الملاجئ للخطر، لكن هذه التحذيرات لم تتحول إلى إجراءات كافية لحماية النازحين، لتبقى المعاناة متوقعة قبل وقوعها، وتتجدد معها نداءات الاستغاثة وموجات التضامن دون حلول تضمن للناس مأوى آمناً.
لم تسلم المراكز التعليمية ومبادرات الخيام في مخيمات النزوح بغزة من قسوة المنخفض الجوي الأول. في غضون دقائق، تحولت الصفوف البديلة التي بناها الأهالي والمتطوعون بالجهد الذاتي إلى برك من المياه العادمة والطين.
ضاعت المستلزمات الدراسية البسيطة وحرم آلاف الأطفال من ملاذهم الوحيد الذي كان يمنحهم شعوراً بالاستقرار النفسي وسط أهوال الحرب.
في الساعات الأولى للمنخفض الجوي، تحولت الخيام في قطاع غزة إلى برك من المياه. لم تكن أمطاراً عادية، بل اختلطت بمياه الصرف الصحي لتغطي أجساد الأطفال. يخوض أطفال غزة معركة بقاء أخرى أمام البرد القارس وأجسادهم الضعيفة التي أنهكها سوء التغذية وقلة الحيلة.
البرد لا يرحم الأجساد الصغيرة.. والسكوت يضاعف المأساة.
لم تتنفس غزة منذ أكثر من 3 أعوام. لم يكفِِ هذا العالم غرقها المستمر بالدماء لتغرق اليوم بمياه أمطار قد لا تكون الأقسى هذا الشتاء.
70 ألف خيمة تؤوي عشرات الآلاف من النازحين، تعرضت للغرق والتلف الجزئي أو الكلي خلال الساعات الـ12 الأولى من المنخفض الجوي.
خلال 12 ساعة فقط من أول منخفض جوي هذا الشتاء، غرقت قرابة ٧٠ ألف خيمة تؤوي عشرات آلاف النازحين في قطاع غزة.
▪️ أكثر من 1500 نداء استغاثة وصلت الدفاع المدني منذ ساعات الفجر، من عائلات غمرت المياه خيامها وفرشها وما تبقى من أغراضها
▪️ عشرات الجدران والأسقف المتصدعة انهارت فوق رؤوس ساكنيها، ووقعت إصابات بعضها خطيرة
▪️ 3 ملايين دولار خسائر أولية خلال اليوم الأول وحده
▪️ قسم الطوارئ في مجمع الشفاء الطبي توقف عن العمل نحو ٤…
من قرى ومدن فلسطين المحتلة، إلى المؤسسات التشريعية الأمريكية…
ثلاث نساء من أصول فلسطينية يحققن حضوراً انتخابياً في الولايات المتحدة الأمريكية، بوصولهن إلى مجلسي النواب والشيوخ في عدد من الولايات.
رشيدة طليب، عبير قواس، ورواء رمان..لكلٍ منهن مواقف ومقولات تمثّل ما سعينَ لأجله.
للعام الرابع على التوالي ونحن نسمع الصرخة نفسها مع كل قطرة مطر تسقط..
فصل آخر من فصول الموت والمعاناة يعيشه الغزيون مع دخول فصل الشتاء الذي يحل ضيفًا ثقيلًا عليهم، فالعائلات والأطفال في الخيام البالية والمهترئة دون أدنى مقومات التدفئة.
هذه نداءات الغزيين في الشتاء طيلة 4 سنوات مرت
أمس، هطلت أولى أمطار هذا الشتاء على قطاع غزة. في أماكن أخرى ينتظر الناس هذه اللحظة بفرح، أما هنا فقد غرقت الخيام، وتسللت المياه إلى فرشات النوم، وأمضت عائلات كاملة ليلتها واقفة تحاول إنقاذ ما تبقى لها.
آلاف النازحين ما زالوا يعيشون في خيام مهترئة ومراكز إيواء تفتقر إلى أبسط مقومات الحياة. لا جدران تصد الريح، ولا سقف يمنع المطر، ولا أرض جافة يضع عليها الأطفال رؤوسهم.
ومع عودة البرد، يعود السؤال ذاته في كل خيمة:
كيف …
يعاني مجمع ناصر الطبي في خان يونس أزمة حادة في نقص الأكفان، وسط تحذيرات من نفاد الكميات المتبقية وتفاقم الأزمة في مستشفيات قطاع غزة كافة. ويُنذر ذلك بتكرار مشاهد تكفين الشهداء بأكياس النايلون كما حدث قبل عامين.
حرمان الشهداء من الدفن بكرامة انتهاك لحق تكفله الشرائع والقانون الإنساني الدولي، ويفرضه حصار الاحتلال على دخول المستلزمات الأساسية.
Showing the 12 most recent of 232 posts we hold for @lebladnet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
صورة وسطر ᥫ᭡. @qggxg · 34,408 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 1 September 2026
نزار قبّاني🌿💛 @Nizar_Alqabbani · 35,050 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 2 September 2026
قرآني جناتي ♥️ @Quranyjannatyofficial · 169,050 Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Leblad البلاد” (@lebladnet), 129,392 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lebladnet.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
