New Video🚀 Don’t Ignore This Official UPSC Update! 🛑 | Notice by UPSC for NDA & CDS | LWS- Sumit Sir Jaao Dekho😱 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qgv4p9XTrYk

Channel
Learn With Sumit
@learnwithsumit
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
19,028subscribers
-31 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001475735229 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @learnwithsumit |
| Description | Subscribe for all study material of Sumit Sir's classes. You will get all the latest updates about upcoming exams @learnwithsumitsir Important Link https://heylink.me/learnwithsumitsir |
| Created | 26 March 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/learnwithsumit |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 12:48 | 19,028 | -4 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:05 | 19,032 | -2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:15 | 19,034 | -16 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:51 | 19,050 | -3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:11 | 19,053 | -10 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:03 | 19,063 | +9 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:37 | 19,054 | -5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:26 | 19,059 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:18 | 19,059 | first reading |
Engagement
82 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.21%
- avg views ÷ 19,028 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 612
- 82 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.214%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 82
- of 82 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 82 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 82 (2 August 2026 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 50,145 |
| Reactions total | 19 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 09:10 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈942
- Videos
- ≈12
- Links
- ≈7,610
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
19 reactions across 11 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 12 | 63.2% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 21.1% | |
| 😐 | 2 | 10.5% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 5.26% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 82 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 82 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
New Video🚀 NDA 2 2026 English | Spotting Errors Complete | NDA English Grammar | VIJAYA 2.0- Learn With Sumit Jaao Dekho😱 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-tCz4CUqPWo
New Video🚀 NDA 2 2026 Biology | Biology Class 1 | NDA Biology Preparation | VIJAYA 2.0 | Learn With Sumit Jaao Dekho😱 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9elB_pQWdXU
New Video🚀 You Are The Future of India! 🇮🇳 I 🇮🇳 Happy Independence Day 2026 Aspirants #independenceday #shorts Jaao Dekho😱 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pE9bI7DGvGE
New Video🚀 Day 35/60 NDA 2 2026 | NDA 60 DAYS CHALLENGE 🔥| Sumit Sir #nda22026 #nda #ndapreparation #lws #short Jaao Dekho😱 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VGDB95WgY90
❤1
New Video🚀 CDS 2 2025 Final Result Out |CDS 2 2025 Cutoff Marks | Final Marks Out of CDS Entry 2025 #cds #lws Jaao Dekho😱 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R6KV6Xbg4bs
New Video🚀 Don’t Pay for NDA Coaching! Join Vijaya 2.0 FREE | India's BEST Free NDA 2 2026 Batch is HERE! #lws Jaao Dekho😱 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ZQka9prVhU
New Video🚀 CDS 2 2025 Final Result Out |CDS 2 2025 Cutoff Marks | Final Marks Out of CDS Entry 2025 | LWS Jaao Dekho😱 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=haD5KO5J5jg
New Video🚀 NDA 2 2026 Exam Day: What to Carry? | Documents Required for NDA 2 2026 🇮🇳 #ndaexam #lws #shorts Jaao Dekho😱 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KKeKcWKFq_Q
Importance of Mocks and How to Attempt🔥☝️☝️
https://www.youtube.com/live/Dm4Bu9xELXg?si=0In6GYwvcCSs_5CS
New Video🚀 High Josh Guaranteed! Top 5 Defence Movies 🇮🇳🔥 | 5 Must-Watch Movies for Aspirants 🎖️ #movie #shorts Jaao Dekho😱 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T0o43_TJn3c
🥰4
Showing the 12 most recent of 82 posts we hold for @learnwithsumit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 195,967 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@pwdefencewallah · 134,317
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Learn With Sumit” (@learnwithsumit), 19,028 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/learnwithsumit.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.