2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,359–1,361 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 14:24
1,360
no change
12 Aug 2026, 11:01
1,360
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 6 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
22.1%
avg views ÷ 1,360 subscribers
Avg views / post
301
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.23%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held
20 (6 December 2025 – 10 August 2026)
Views total
902
Reactions total
47
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 11:01 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
54s
Average length
54s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
298 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
121
40.6%
custom 5424972470023104089
81
27.2%
👏
46
15.4%
👍
40
13.4%
🔥
7
2.35%
👎
3
1.01%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 298reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 December 2025 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 20 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @learnPOV. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 December 2025 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
یکی از دوستان این پیام رو فرستاد و به نظرم سؤال خیلی مهمیه که جوابش رو باید از دل جامعه برنامهنویسی پیدا کنیم ✅
قبل از اینکه تصمیم بگیریم LearnPOV به چه سمتی بره میخوایم بدونیم:
این روزها در مسیر برنامهنویسی، کار و رشد حرفهای، بیشتر درگیر چه چالشی هستی؟
اگه برنامهنویسی، چند دقیقه وقت بذار و تجربهت رو از طریق فرم زیر باهامون به اشتراک بذار ❤️
🔗 مشاهده فرم
درود دوستان،
نسخه نخست پلتفرم «وبها» (Webha) تا ۱۸ روز آینده رسماً راهاندازی خواهد شد. اگر هنوز با کارکرد وبها آشنایی ندارید، باید اشاره کنم که این سرویس یک پلتفرم وبلاگنویسی نسل سوم محسوب میشود؛ پروژهای که با هدف مدرنسازی و احیای مجدد فرهنگ وبلاگنویسی پا به عرصه وجود گذاشت.
اما در طول مسیر توسعه، چشمانداز ما گسترش یافت و تمرکز پلتفرم به سمت ایجاد فضایی امن و اختصاصی برای وبلاگنویسان، نویسندگان، روزنامهنگا…
جلسه اول (مقدمه) مینی دوره برنامه نویسان ارزش آفرین
معرفی سرفصل های دوره: 00:47
تفاوت این دوره با بقیه دوره ها: 06:46
این دوره مناسب چه افرادی نیست؟ 08:32
خروجی این دوره چیه؟ 13:23
@MohammadHosseinTazaroie
همونطور که میدونید بعد از حضور AI نیاز شرکت های نرم افزاری خیلی کمتر شده به برنامه نویس، و خیلی ها تو این شرایط تعدیل شدند 🤦♂️
واقعا تو این شرایط باید چیکار کرد ⁉️
اینجاست که مفهوم "فریلنسر کارآفرین" مطرح میشه، ما توی این دوره قرار نیست راجب یک روش و نوع خاص پروژه گرفتن صحبت کنیم
ما میخوایم راجب مفاهیم پایهای و بسیار مهم مثل ارزش آفرینی، ارتباط سازی موثر و... صحبت کنیم که شمارو به نتایج پایدار میرسونه.
منتظر…
سلام رفقا
این یه سالی که گذشت واقعا عجیب بود... 😅
فکر کنم برای همهمون، جدای از زندگی شخصی، توی مسیر برنامهنویسی هم پر از چالشهای عجیب و بالا و پایینهای غیرمنتظره بوده.
خیلی دلم میخواد بدونم توی این مدت، حستون نسبت به برنامه نویسی چی بوده، هنوز همون ذوق و هیجان اول رو دارید، یا حستون نسبت بهش عوض شده؟
اصلاً چیه که توی این مسیر باعث شده ادامه بدید؟
هر چیزی دوست داشتید بنویسید، راحت باشید
سلام دوستان عزیز، امیدوارم حالتون خوب باشه ❤️
بعد از ۴ ماه قطعی اینترنت دوباره برگشتیم، متاسفانه به دلیل ناپایداری زیر ساخت ها و شرایط فعلی، LearnPOV به طور موقت قطع هست.
اما تیم توسعه ما در این ۳ ماه، به طور مداوم در حال توسعه بوده و محصول جدید ما به نام webha به زودی منتشر میشه، میتونید از طریق آدرس وبلاگ webha بیشتر راجب این سیستم بدونید
🔗 https://news.webha.blog
همچنین کامیونیتی جدید ما به نام Devirnet راه ا…
ورژن جدید LearnPOV منتشر شد 💎
توی این آپدیت چندین تغییر مهم داشتیم :
🟡اضافه شدن بخش کامنتها
🟡ثبتنام و ورود با google
🟡بهبود تجربه کاربری در بخشهای اصلی پلتفرم
🏫 learnpov.com
📢 پیام رسان امن داخلی!؟
این روزا که دسترسی خوبی به اینترنت نداریم، ممکنه مجبور به استفاده از بعضی اپ های ناامن بشیم امااا پیام رسان های امن زیادی وجود داره که یوزرفرندلی هستن و به راحتی میتونید برای خونواده و دوستاتون هم نصب کنید... ادامه پست
✍️ نویسنده : امین زارع
#️⃣ #tips #free_software
📌 @LearnPOV
سلام رفقا امیدوارم حالتون خوب باشه 🌱
تا ۵ نفر میتونید با کد تخفیف LearnPOV توی جلسه دوم ثبت نام کنید ✌️
فقط اینکه نهایتا تا ۵ دقیقه قبل از رویداد حتما ثبتنامتون رو تکمیل کنید.
دومین رویداد GIT در CS12
روز پنجشنبه ۱۱ دی ماه ساعت ۲۰:۰۰ تا ۲۲:۰۰ به صورت آنلاین در ایوند برگزار میشه.
لینک جلسه برای ثبت نام کنندگان توسط ایوند ارسال میشه.
ظرفیت فقط ۵۰ نفر هست!
همین حالا ثبت نام کنید!
🖥 Join - [CS12]
custom 54249724700231040898❤1👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @learnPOV. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 822,555 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LearnPOV | لرن پی او وی” (@learnPOV), 1,360 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/learnPOV.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.