今天休息

Channel
绿茶小兽的全家桶
@lcxsdqjt999
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,547subscribers
+113 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003945161773 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lcxsdqjt999 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 30 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lcxsdqjt999 |
Topic
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 09:00 | 1,547 | +5 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 19:55 | 1,542 | -3 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 12:40 | 1,545 | +6 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 19:23 | 1,539 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 18:16 | 1,540 | +4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 09:56 | 1,536 | +9 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 15:53 | 1,527 | +58 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 14:55 | 1,469 | +30 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:24 | 1,439 | +3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:56 | 1,436 | +3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:47 | 1,433 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:47 | 1,434 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 30 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 6s
- Average length
- 6s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
17 reactions across 7 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 94.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 16 | 94.1% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 5.88% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 May 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
厦门茶馆专属报告模板 @xiamencai 🏷基础信息 【老师名字】:小兽 【老师账号】:@fast8688 【验证表哥】:YIN 【榜单来源】:茶艺榜 @xiamenchayi 💯综合评价 【人照评分】:9 【颜值评分】:9 【服务评分】:9.5 【环境评分】:9 评分标准:5及以下差, 6分为良,7分为精,8分为优,9分为佳,10分为绝 👙软硬配置 【熊器尺寸】:B? 【紧度湿度】:会夹,不用润滑,喜欢大jj 【优点缺点】:虽然是嫩妹,但是有服务,老师小小一只但是会深喉还是很猛的,很温柔,可以大蟒蛇,聊天不冷场 💋自由发挥 【过程描述】:最近一段时间,身体和精神都像被什么悄悄压住,提不起兴致,也很难真正放松下来。 厦门的盛夏总是这样。太阳悬在高处,空气里浮着一层散不开的潮气,哪怕只是站在路边多待了一会儿,衣服也很快贴上后背。人被闷热困得久了,连情绪都像蒙上一层薄雾。又众多老师红休,一直看到小兽报班,隔着屏幕都能感受…
❤1
厦门茶馆专属报告模板 @xiamencai 🏷基础信息 【老师名字】:小兽 【老师账号】:@fast8688 【验证表哥】:fqxps 【榜单来源】:茶艺榜 @xiamenchayi 💯综合评价 【人照评分】:9 【颜值评分】:8 【服务评分】:10 【环境评分】:8 评分标准:5及以下差, 6分为良,7分为精,8分为优,9分为佳,10分为绝 👙软硬配置 【熊器尺寸】:A- 【紧度湿度】:紧致,会夹 【优点缺点】:优点:嫩妹中少有的服务系,而且p500pp900要什么自行车,一直嘟老师也没有怨言。缺点:身材比较瘦小,但也算特色。就是刚搬来新课室,没有准备饮料,好在老师直接点了外卖送来。 💋自由发挥 【过程描述】:刚回厦门就想点个嫩妹,但是好多都红休(像是约好了一样),翻来找去的时候,小兽回消息了,于是约好时间,遥控上楼。开门一看,老师小小的一只,看照片以为有170了,实际可能158这样,但略显成熟。因为第一次到新课室,…
今天满课了哦
红休结束啦 明天可以约课啦~
❤1
红休了 🥹🥹🥹
今天3.30开噢,头课还在
满课咯
❤1
15点开哦
今天休息哦
今天开课哦
厦门茶馆专属报告模板 @xiamenchayuan 🏷基础信息 【老师名字】:小兽 【榜单来源】:茶艺榜 @xiamenchayi 💯综合评价 【人照评分】:8 【颜值评分】:7.5 【服务评分】:10 【环境评分】:10 评分标准:5及以下差, 6分为良,7分为精,8分为优,9分为佳,10分为绝 👙软硬配置 【熊器尺寸】:A白偏粉 【紧度湿度】:紧又热 【优点缺点】:结合价格来说实事求是评论没有任何缺点 💋自由发挥 【过程描述】:去年朋友已经强力推荐了,叫我一定要去,拖延到今天终于见到了。妹妹基本和照片视频差不多,实际上脸可能还比照片小点。 身体白白嫩嫩,身高不高,属于香香软软小蛋糕类型。主要是妹子会聊天,适合社恐的表哥过去,绝对不冷场。值得一提的是环境,没有闷热的蒸汽,也没有随地洒落的浴巾垃圾啥的,床上也铺着一次性床单,甚至进门拖鞋还给你套了鞋套。大家应该都踩过上个表哥用过的湿拖鞋吧,在这里是不存在的,真是干净又卫…
❤6👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @lcxsdqjt999. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@lcxsdqjt999 named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“绿茶小兽的全家桶” (@lcxsdqjt999), 1,547 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lcxsdqjt999.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.