Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for TG网络改善-节点🇨🇳

Channel

TG网络改善-节点🇨🇳

@lcgkj

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

112subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001631728606
TypeChannel
Username@lcgkj
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 13 March 2022 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 October 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/lcgkj

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 26 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

11211811510 August 2026 — 118 subscribers10 August 2026 — 118 subscribers1 September 2026 — 117 subscribers10 September 2026 — 116 subscribers19 September 2026 — 115 subscribers4 October 2026 — 112 subscribers10 August 20264 October 2026
6 measurements spanning 55 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 111–119 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Oct 2026, 10:20112-3
19 Sept 2026, 17:58115-1
10 Sept 2026, 18:35116-1
1 Sept 2026, 06:37117-1
10 Aug 2026, 01:30118no change
10 Aug 2026, 01:17118first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 March 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 October 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
54m 40s
Average length
13m 40s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

27 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1763.0%
👎725.9%
🥰27.41%
👏13.70%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 March 2022 to 18 October 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Oct 2022, 09:05 UTC647 viewsread 10 August 2026

点击链接加入群聊【吃瓜❤️三千片】:https://jq.qq.com/?_wv=1027&k=XMYQoa80

18 Jul 2022, 16:27 UTC869 viewsread 10 August 2026

https://outin-7492ac9106b511edab5a00163e1c60dc.oss-cn-shanghai.aliyuncs.com/sv/512cb5e1-182121c1316/512cb5e1-182121c1316.mp4?Expires=1658164833&OSSAccessKeyId=LTAIrkwb21KyGjJl&Signature=UL3nCIY5N7UVF68iNrm4a9M1Dt4%3D

31 Mar 2022, 04:48 UTC≈2,490 viewsread 10 August 2026

后台统计累计3000多人使用过,正在使用的有50人

22 Mar 2022, 16:57 UTC≈3,440 views13 reactionsread 10 August 2026

TG认证地址:http://103.149.145.125:80/add.php TG一键链接: tg://proxy?server=103.149.145.125&port=443&secret=eeccc5f89d99234aac9553a1d28cba13b17777772e6d6963726f736f66742e636f6d 先认证 后连接

👎6👍4🥰2👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @lcgkj. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TG网络改善-节点🇨🇳” (@lcgkj), 112 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lcgkj.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.