Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Тарасов Владимир // 🍍Ананас маркетинг🍍

Channel

Тарасов Владимир // 🍍Ананас маркетинг🍍

@lazyhim

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

832subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001568783562
TypeChannel
Username@lazyhim
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/lazyhim

Growth

832833832.57 August 2026 — 833 subscribers8 August 2026 — 833 subscribers22 August 2026 — 832 subscribers7 August 202622 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 15 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 832–833 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 11:24832-1
8 Aug 2026, 01:21833no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:18833first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 5 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.9%
avg views ÷ 832 subscribers
Avg views / post
157
1 post measured
Reaction rate
7.64%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held18 (5 March 20263 August 2026)
Views total157
Reactions total12
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 01:21 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

214 reactions across 15 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥12056.1%
4119.2%
👍3315.4%
😁83.74%
🍾41.87%
😱20.935%
❤‍🔥10.467%
🎉10.467%
🏆10.467%
👎10.467%
🤝10.467%
🤬10.467%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 214reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 5 March 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 18 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lazyhim. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 March 2026 to 3 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC157 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Закрыли Июль. Две самые большие ниши у нас: 🎯 Химчистка ковров — 1 280 заявок по 251 ₽ 🎯 Химчистка мебели — 582 заявки по 191 ₽ ВК + Авито, разбивка по каналам на карточках. Главное в цифрах: Авито чуть дешевле, но ВК даёт половину объёма по коврам. Зачем получать меньше заявок, когда можно получать больше ☺️ Оказываете услуги или обучаете и вам нужны клиенты? Пишите @volodtarasov

👍6🔥42

23 Jul 2026, 15:52 UTC281 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сколько надо тратить день на рекламу? Суровый ларек с мороженным в Самаре на фото, это постирония маркетолога или просто какой-то тупой угар, интересно.. Вопрос прямо таки актуальный. Как я для себя на него отвечаю, когда делаю рекламу и ищу себе клиентов. Цифры выдуманы просто чтобы показать логику) 1️⃣ У меня есть стоимость услуги - например таргетированная реклама с бюджетом от 50к стоит 35к/мес 2️⃣ Из этих д

4👍4😱1

20 Jul 2026, 08:38 UTC296 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🦁 Без длинной прелюдии - вот видео которое обещал Если тебе нужна инструкция как поставить это себе на пк, как купить себе иишку, как сделать карту для оплаты подписок и вот это все, ставь ❤️ С этой неделе я начинаю обкатку этой системы на 4 разноплановых проектах и буду делиться с вами какие результаты у нас получаются.

4🔥3👍2

15 Jul 2026, 07:54 UTC307 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

😁8🤬1

13 Jul 2026, 12:11 UTC340 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🫆 Почему я всю дорогу топлю за соц сети и продуманные воронки вокруг них.. и буду продолжать? Да давай тупо взглянем на тех кто топит за другие инструменты - сео, гео, авито, директы и тд Где они это делают? Смекаешь? Даже если кто-то как я говорит про комплексный системный подход.. говорят об этом в соц сетях) За последние 2 года я успел позаниматься примерно всем. И все равно каждый раз все возвращается на круги

🔥182🎉1

26 Jun 2026, 07:11 UTC415 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Че по таргету?

  1. Крутим, есть результат11%
  2. Работает, результат ок11%
  3. Выключили, не работает26%
  4. Даже не пробуем53%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Jun 2026, 07:09 UTC391 viewsread 8 August 2026

🫶🏻 Как у тебя Таргет ВК поживает? У нас где-то пушка вообще заявки прут, а где-то тишина. У меня есть гипотезы почему так происходит, там не в самом таргете дело скорее всего. Но все таки..

4 Jun 2026, 05:22 UTC566 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤔 4 слоя данных достаточно, чтобы развалить любого конкурента и сделать идеальный маркетинговый анализ с помощью ИИ Провел встречу с ребятами из своей десятки в Самаре по теме внедрения ИИ в бизнес За последнюю неделю у меня накопилось много чем можно поделиться. Я как будто рыбка в аквариуме был.. тусил в своем замкнутом пространстве) думал уже все вовсю используют агентов. А там вопросы еще самые базовые не закр

🔥8👍72

26 May 2026, 05:36 UTC506 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Так… ну во-первых: Арсенал чемпион 🏑 поздравляю всех причастных! Спустя двадцать с лишним лет боли и страданий, все воздалось. Терпения фанатам не занимать) 20 лет ждать, чтобы проект выстрелил 👌 надеюсь мои личные чутка быстрее принесут результат) Во-вторых я прошел все стадии принятия ии и мне больше не смешно, когда говорят что кого-то там заменят) всех джунов и простые задачи по сбору данных по типу анализа к

🔥11🍾42

1 May 2026, 13:39 UTC581 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Зашёл в новый проект. И получил первые результаты от «второго мозга» Первую неделю я просто погружался и собирал данные. В какой-то момент докопался до выгрузки с клиентами, что и когда они заказывали. А там 🙈 • около 5 000 клиентов • 62 000 строк • сотни столбцов • услуги, заказ-наряды, даты, суммы • история по каждому клиенту за 2-2,5 года С одной стороны — золото. С другой — таблица, которую хз как анализирова

🔥134👍4🏆1

21 Apr 2026, 11:13 UTC574 views18 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

🫨 Хочу отвечать за деньги в бизнесе, а не за клики. Че делать? С одной стороны можно просто продолжать продавать услуги типо таргета, контекста и обеспечивать поток заявок бизнесу. С другой стороны это максимально скучно, кабинеты постоянно отваливаются, лиды дальше папки неразобранное не двигаются и еще тысяча приколов. Годами я продавал как ремесленник узкий набор навыков: клики, ставки, cpl, крео и тд.. Пригна

9🔥8❤‍🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @lazyhim. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

26 Jun 2026, 07:11 UTCAnonymous Poll47 voters

Че по таргету?

  1. Крутим, есть результат11%
  2. Работает, результат ок11%
  3. Выключили, не работает26%
  4. Даже не пробуем53%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 5 March 2026 to 3 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Тарасов Владимир // 🍍Ананас маркетинг🍍” (@lazyhim), 832 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lazyhim.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.