Добавили новые способы обхода ограничений мобильного интернета. Плюс подняли новые серваки: выше скорость, стабильнее в часы пик, и есть запас на случай блокировок. От вас ничего не требуется — просто обновите конфиг в боте, чтобы подтянулись новые серверы. 🎁 До конца августа увеличили бонус за друга: если он оплатит подписку, вы и он получите по 10 дней бесплатно вместо недели. Не с нами? Пробный период без прив…
Views per post sit far above this size band
13,800 average views per post against 8,967 subscribers — an engagement rate of 154.3%. Across the 40,483 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,163–9,999 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 7.15% and 26.5%, with a median of 14.2%.
| Window | 30 days (13 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 17 of 17 published in the window (0 exact, 17 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 235,170 |
| Mature posts only | 149.9% over 16 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 8,967 measured 12 August 2026 |
| Cohort | b3162:rus · 40,483 channels · p10 3.46% · p25 7.15% · p50 14.2% · p75 26.5% · p90 43.8% |
| Position in cohort | 99.637th percentile · 10.9× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.043% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Russian · 100.0%of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
