Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝑙𝑖𝑙𝑢𝑠ℎ𝑖𝑘’𝑠 𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑟𝑦

Channel

𝑙𝑖𝑙𝑢𝑠ℎ𝑖𝑘’𝑠 𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑟𝑦

@lazaryanl

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

365subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001670357722
TypeChannel
Username@lazaryanl
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 September 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/lazaryanl

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3653773717 August 2026 — 375 subscribers7 August 2026 — 376 subscribers14 August 2026 — 370 subscribers22 August 2026 — 371 subscribers30 August 2026 — 372 subscribers7 September 2026 — 377 subscribers7 September 2026 — 377 subscribers14 September 2026 — 365 subscribers7 August 202614 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 38 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 363–379 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 17:55365-12
7 Sept 2026, 21:22377no change
7 Sept 2026, 13:40377+5
30 Aug 2026, 07:54372+1
22 Aug 2026, 20:46371+1
14 Aug 2026, 18:25370-6
7 Aug 2026, 21:11376+1
7 Aug 2026, 15:56375first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 17 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
52.9%
avg views ÷ 365 subscribers
Avg views / post
193
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
16.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 September 2026
Posts held15 (17 August 20267 September 2026)
Views total2,508
Reactions total390
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Sept 2026, 21:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
27s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

451 reactions across 14 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53101703048934419459922.0%
custom 54225631093342002718418.6%
custom 54227218513254578557817.3%
custom 54228104565007760525913.1%
custom 5462923737353464967429.31%
custom 5422588522655685287378.20%
custom 5463124299441283680183.99%
custom 5420409732991067721132.88%
custom 5422665973800936247102.22%
custom 546287760081476690981.77%
custom 542033850954839739830.665%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 451 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 17 August 2026 to 7 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
133
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 15 we hold a reading for · 47%
Most on one post
56
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lazaryanl. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 August 2026 to 7 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Sept 2026, 19:13 UTC71 views24 reactionsread 7 September 2026
Photo

у меня сегодня какой то пикми-нефор образ🎞️ ( то, что играет в наушниках, даже обсуждать не будем)

custom 54225631093342002719custom 53101703048934419455custom 54225885226556852875custom 54629237373534649673custom 54227218513254578551custom 54628776008147669091

Signed 𝓁𝒾𝓁𝑜’

6 Sept 2026, 00:30 UTC146 views37 reactionsread 7 September 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 542256310933420027114custom 53101703048934419458custom 54227218513254578557custom 54629237373534649674custom 54631242994412836802custom 54225885226556852871custom 54226659738009362471

Signed 𝓁𝒾𝓁𝑜’

5 Sept 2026, 17:53 UTC136 views31 reactionsread 7 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 54225885226556852879custom 54225631093342002717custom 54631242994412836806custom 54629237373534649675custom 54204097329910677213custom 54227218513254578551

Signed 𝓁𝒾𝓁𝑜’

5 Sept 2026, 13:51 UTC141 views7 reactionsread 7 September 2026

💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! Подскажите пожалуйста, за сколько вы пишете дипломные работы?Хотел в лс написать, но у вас сообщения закрыты На самом деле нет какой то определенной суммы, всё зависит от объема, темы и требований к работе, поэтому можете оставить свой ник, я свяжусь с вами и обсудим🌟

custom 54228104565007760527

Signed 𝓁𝒾𝓁𝑜’

5 Sept 2026, 13:05 UTC139 views28 reactionsread 7 September 2026
Photo

Словами не передать, как мне приятно, когда я получаю такие сообщения…просто в самое сердечко ❤️

custom 531017030489344194511custom 54225885226556852877custom 54227218513254578555custom 54225631093342002712custom 54631242994412836802custom 54226659738009362471

Signed 𝓁𝒾𝓁𝑜’

4 Sept 2026, 19:28 UTC149 views15 reactionsread 7 September 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

custom 54225631093342002716custom 54203385095483973983custom 54629237373534649673custom 54631242994412836803

Signed 𝓁𝒾𝓁𝑜’

2 Sept 2026, 19:18 UTC189 views32 reactions10 Starsread 7 September 2026
Photo

🕯️Однажды женщину 🕯️находят мертвой в 🕯️собственной постели, двери изнутри заперты и попасть туда никто не мог, но в этом доме каждый что то скрывает, поэтому теперь под подозрением все📖 😼обожаю Кристи, поэтому в планах дочитать сегодня ее и начать другую. кстати, очень нравится читать с айпада, особенно ночью, поэтому теперь я точно уверена в том, что мне нужна электронная книга🐱🤩 #читаемсЛилушик

custom 542256310933420027111custom 53101703048934419459custom 54225885226556852877custom 54631242994412836803custom 54227218513254578551custom 54228104565007760521

Signed 𝐿𝑎𝑧𝑎𝑟𝑦𝑎𝑛

1 Sept 2026, 18:02 UTC218 views51 reactions56 Starsread 7 September 2026
Photo

🤩🍂

custom 542281045650077605216custom 531017030489344194513custom 542272185132545785513custom 54225885226556852873custom 54225631093342002712custom 54629237373534649672custom 54631242994412836802

Signed 𝐿𝑎𝑧𝑎𝑟𝑦𝑎𝑛

30 Aug 2026, 21:33 UTC250 views58 reactionsread 7 September 2026

я отдаляюсь от всех, потому что однажды субботним вечером заметила, что люди, о которых я забочусь, не заботятся обо мне, как я о них

custom 542272185132545785522custom 531017030489344194515custom 542281045650077605215custom 54226659738009362475custom 54204097329910677211

Signed 𝐿𝑎𝑧𝑎𝑟𝑦𝑎𝑛

28 Aug 2026, 18:49 UTC311 views45 reactions21 Starsread 7 September 2026
Video

превращаю тгк в тт😼

custom 546292373735346496712custom 542281045650077605210custom 54227218513254578559custom 53101703048934419457custom 54225631093342002715custom 54204097329910677212

Signed 𝐿𝑎𝑧𝑎𝑟𝑦𝑎𝑛

27 Aug 2026, 20:47 UTC317 views32 reactions1 Starread 7 September 2026
Photo

🥏🌼 в последнее время у меня гиперфикс на разных раскрасках (но больше всего нравится пересматривать мультики, когда раскрашиваю их)

custom 531017030489344194512custom 54227218513254578557custom 54628776008147669097custom 54225631093342002712custom 54629237373534649672custom 54225885226556852871custom 54228104565007760521

Signed 𝐿𝑎𝑧𝑎𝑟𝑦𝑎𝑛

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @lazaryanl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝑙𝑖𝑙𝑢𝑠ℎ𝑖𝑘’𝑠 𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑟𝑦” (@lazaryanl), 365 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lazaryanl.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.