Channel
@lazarevvr
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
856subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002493866665 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lazarevvr |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lazarevvr |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:54 | 856 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:17 | 857 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 14 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
1,061 reactions across 14 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 432 | 40.7% | |
| custom 5307608653254116489 | 160 | 15.1% | |
| custom 5323812645738923573 | 130 | 12.3% | |
| 💋 | 110 | 10.4% | |
| custom 5242496888917210238 | 76 | 7.16% | |
| custom 5307549391295371115 | 59 | 5.56% | |
| 💔 | 49 | 4.62% | |
| custom 5373262932090049772 | 24 | 2.26% | |
| custom 5325578976809204129 | 14 | 1.32% | |
| custom 5323697089643824831 | 7 | 0.66% |
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,061reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 14 December 2025 to 2 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lazarevvr. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 December 2025 to 2 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
не знаю в чем секрет счастья, но когда я поскользнулся и упал членом прямо в пизду бывшей 7 раз подряд, печальным я точно не был
❤40custom 532381264573892357325custom 530760865325411648917custom 53236970896438248311
пох кайфуйте
custom 532381264573892357329❤19custom 530760865325411648911custom 53236970896438248312
сука нахуя мне телеграм канал
custom 530760865325411648912custom 53236970896438248314custom 53238126457389235733
я ненавижу всех тех, кто ищет легкодоступных девиц на бибинто, вы –нелюди(мне оставили только толстожопых бегемотов с прической роналду)
custom 530760865325411648958custom 537326293209004977220custom 524249688891721023818❤4
как ни зайду посмотреть, кто отписывается, – там ток страшные телки. естественный отбор?
custom 530760865325411648942custom 524249688891721023816custom 532381264573892357315
из-за блядского ркн не грузятся тысячи сообщений от развратных женщин которые я должен был сегодня получить
custom 524249688891721023842custom 530760865325411648918custom 532557897680920412914❤1custom 53732629320900497721
зови её замуж как можно скорее, если она попала хоть под один пункт 1) родители в разводе 2) мягкотелый отец 3) обилие татуировок 4) долги 5) указание местоимений в био 6) мировоззрение, где им кто-то что-то обязан 7) подруги влияют на её решения 8) не может гулять с тобой в центре 9) есть лучший друг 10) было только два бывших – остальные не считаются
❤47custom 530754939129537111519💋15custom 53238126457389235733custom 53732629320900497723custom 53076086532541164892
интим – это рыночный ресурс, который женщины обменивают на ресурсы, брак, верность. легкодоступные дампят эту «цену», соответственно, обесценивают единственный женский козырь – и за это порицаются обществом(другими женщинами)
❤35💋13💔9
тяжелый вайб админа
❤41custom 530754939129537111515custom 532381264573892357314
20
❤42💋22custom 532381264573892357315custom 53075493912953711155
ассоциируете ли вы меня с ним?
❤50💋16💔9custom 53238126457389235734custom 53075493912953711151
morning of strong men
❤47💔17💋16
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @lazarevvr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 1,457,366 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“lazarev” (@lazarevvr), 856 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lazarevvr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.