Channel
@lawyerzhuk
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
811subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001169951342 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lawyerzhuk |
| Created | 16 November 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lawyerzhuk |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Oct 2026, 02:16 | 811 | +1 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 12:16 | 810 | -3 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 12:39 | 813 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 06:56 | 815 | -3 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 01:03 | 818 | +2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:17 | 816 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 817 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:35 | 817 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 23 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
194 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 68 | 35.1% | |
| 👍 | 65 | 33.5% | |
| ❤ | 22 | 11.3% | |
| 🔥 | 17 | 8.76% | |
| 🤣 | 10 | 5.15% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 2.06% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 1.55% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 1.03% | |
| 💅 | 1 | 0.515% | |
| 🙈 | 1 | 0.515% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 0.515% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 194 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 March 2026 to 3 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Почта тоже бывает неправильной ... В отношении одной крупной и достаточно уникальной финтех компании одного государства другое государство, которое приграничное, ввело санкции. Финех компания решила обжаловать решение госоргана, который ввел санкции. Но большой проблемой оказалось найти в приграничном государстве юристов, которые согласились бы составить жалобу подсанкционной компании. В итоге мужественная юрфирма в…
👍2
Signed A
Photo, posted without a caption
😁9👍3🤣2
Signed A
Photo, posted without a caption
😁12❤1
Signed A
Photo, posted without a caption
😁7
Signed A
Как уменьшить пеню при подписании договора Если уже согласились на пеню в договоре (что, кстати, делать не обязательно, и, как правило, необходимость неустойки в договоре законом не предусмотрена), старайтесь установить ее в своих интересах. 1. Вместо 0.1% настаивайте на 0.01% или даже 0.001% за каждый день 2. Устанавливайте процент не за день, а за год 3. Ограничивайте пеню процентом задолженности (например, не бол…
👍6❤3
Signed A
Photo, posted without a caption
👍8
Signed A
Получили пеню 30% от задолженности Взыскали недавно с Заказчика IT услуг пеню в размере целых 30% от суммы задолженности. Не скрою, были сомнения, что суд уменьшит неустойку, сославшись на ее явную несоразмерность. НО. Суд встал на сторону Истца и в решении написал: 1. Суть договорной неустойки: компенсация убытков + удержание должника от просрочки 2. Несоразмерность – это чрезмерно высокий процент неустойки, значит…
👍11
Signed A
Photo, posted without a caption
🤣7😢3👍2😭2💅1
Signed A
Из Договора: «Стоимость Услуг» - означает сумму денег, подлежащую уплате ...
😁4🙈1
Signed A
Зарядился облачными инновациями на AWS Summit Warsaw ☁️🇵🇱 !
👍7🔥4
Signed A
Литовские компании-должники уже становятся почти родными Раньше удавалось все решить на досудебной стадии: пускай и через несколько претензий, но оплачивали. Теперь первый «крепкий» кейс. Долг литовской компании (Заказчика) перед польской компанией (Исполнителем) за оказанные ИТ-услуги 15 000 евро. После безрезультатной переписки на уровне менеджмента подключили юристов. Направили от Заказчика 2 претензии с разницей…
👍4
Signed A
Photo, posted without a caption
😁12🤣1
Signed A
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @lawyerzhuk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“юрист Александр Жук” (@lawyerzhuk), 811 subscribers as measured 11 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lawyerzhuk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.