Section 498A IPC Covers Live-In Relationships That Qualify As "Relationships In Nature Of Marriage" Between Consenting Adults With Intent To Marry: Supreme Court The Apex Court held that Section 498A IPC can apply to live-in relationships qualifying as relationships in the nature of marriage, but restricted the ruling to consenting adults and added that intent to marry must be established because the provision carrie…

Channel
👩⚖️LAW LEARNER'S GROUP🤵
@lawlearnersgroup
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,655subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001344341644 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lawlearnersgroup |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lawlearnersgroup |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:55 | 1,655 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:31 | 1,655 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 6 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 8.65%
- avg views ÷ 1,655 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 143
- 7 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 7
- of 15 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (6 February 2025 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,002 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 11:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Dear all After a long break we are back in action
### *Step-by-Step Process to Check if Your Physical Verification or Declaration Form Has Been Received by the Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa* If you have submitted your verification or declaration form in physical format, follow these steps to verify on the Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa's website (barcouncilmahgoa.org) whether it has been received. This process involves registering, logging in, and checking…
File, posted without a caption
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/the-summit-17_meet-our-resource-person-international-activity-7324344779763240960-qL7D?utm_source=social_share_video_v2&utm_medium=android_app&rcm=ACoAACogFBkBmGhyT5p-8Ydobdb-yY-R2WdsShc&utm_campaign=copy_link
“There is only allegation that petitioner no. 1 is leading an adulterous life. But such allegation is based only on suspicion. There is no cogent evidence adduced in support of his allegation. The proved fact is that his wife is living separately along with the minor daughter and she is unable to maintain herself and the minor daughter,” the Court added. Hence, the Court said there was no doubt about the entitlement…
The Patna High Court in a recent ruling has reaffirmed that a Muslim woman, even after being divorced, is entitled to claim maintenance under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.PC) if her former husband has not made sufficient provision for her livelihood during the iddat period or thereafter. The Court observed that the existence of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986, does not …
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @lawlearnersgroup. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@UPSSSC_PET_UPPCS_UP_PCS_RO_ARO · 164,693
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“👩⚖️LAW LEARNER'S GROUP🤵” (@lawlearnersgroup), 1,655 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lawlearnersgroup.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.