Channel
@lavrixarts
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
118subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003305900156 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lavrixarts |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 21 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lavrixarts |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:23 | 118 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:31 | 118 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 21 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (21 March 2026 – 31 July 2026) |
| Views total | 326 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 20:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
161 reactions across 7 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5361655417900403743 | 60 | 37.3% | |
| custom 5195074617403805000 | 51 | 31.7% | |
| custom 5363837849697292756 | 22 | 13.7% | |
| custom 5197225077464141281 | 19 | 11.8% | |
| custom 5362077338307696954 | 7 | 4.35% | |
| custom 5195359412390231718 | 2 | 1.24% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 161reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 21 March 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
всем приветт,, беру срочные коммишки, потомучто надо накопить 4.8к₽ в срочном порядке до 6 августа беру до 750₽ за одну работу любой сложности, но за сложный фон + 50-100₽ (обговорим) открытое NSFW НЕ‼️ рисую. могу нарисовать намек или что-то в этом роде, но цена будет чуть выше, так как браться за это рискуюсь за дополнительного персонажа + 200₽ к работе. за срочность + 100₽ целую тех, кто сразу пишет все: скид…
File, posted without a caption
ВТФФФ ПОЧЕМУ ВАС ТУТ ТАК МНОГО РЕБЯТ?? я давно забыла про этот канал
я разучилась рисовать полностью, не рисую абсолютно ничего уже достаточно долго вот так вот
custom 519507461740380500020custom 53638378496972927565custom 53616554179004037434
я не буду кидать то кпк выходит оно оч кривое 💔 лучше посмотрите на другой мой шедевр
custom 536383784969729275617
холст у мня жесть нет настроения в тг сидеть простите кому я не пишу совсем, я хочу, но боюсь я долго не продержусь день тяжеловат 🥀
custom 536165541790040374317
пр задание по изо в школе… эскиз, потом будет перенос его на холст, а затем будем вышивать нитками ✌️
custom 536165541790040374316
мытеряем лаврикса это что не осд ааа маклин привет 😶 мне не нрав как он вышел, я не буду ему эту алопецию доделывать
custom 519722507746414128119custom 53616554179004037433custom 51953594123902317182custom 51950746174038050001
пусть
custom 519507461740380500023
я умерла но у мя каникулы, повод воскреситься. у меня ужаснейший артблок, вы не поверите sorry за такое молчание, я по вам скучала 😭
custom 536165541790040374320custom 51950746174038050007custom 53620773383076969547
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @lavrixarts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 565,946 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝚕𝚊𝚟𝚛𝚒𝚡 𝚊𝚛𝚝𝚜” (@lavrixarts), 118 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lavrixarts.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.