Channel
@laviedeli
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
46subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001477522896 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @laviedeli |
| Description | Нотатки про прочитане |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 28 May 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/laviedeli |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:16 | 46 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:43 | 46 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 28 May 2020 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 19 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 29 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
А хто сказав, що Лаврентіївський рукопис найкращий? Вочевидь, найкращими і найближчими до оригіналу були рукописи староукраїнського походження, навіть такі, здавалося б, пізні, як Острозький, переписаний для князя Василя Костянтина Острозького в 16 столітті. До чого це? А от до чого. У неділю, 21 травня, я представлю свої власні знахідки, які скоро будуть опубліковані в журналі "Мовознавство" та інших журналах. Ідеть…
Ми почали! Перша зустріч у рамках мого лекційного проєкту “Український текст” відбулася цієї неділі і була присвячена глибокому читанню народних пісень. Дякую усім присутнім за увагу, зацікавлення і запитання (і звісно, за ваші донати)! Тому продовжуємо далі. У неділю, 30 квітня, о 15.00 за Києвом / 14.00 за Варшавою/Берліном/Парижем будемо говорити про УКРАЇНСЬКІ НАРОДНІ ДУМИ і що про них може сказати сучасна наука.…
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.thoughtcrime.securesms&fbclid=IwAR1VoLlkMY1HOHaGcGLNHSTOY0hNhnNteShr_r4h2_-NFEdwhY8OmchY86o
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rOis3_L44UPRvmBK9SwUuXN2_65T4EdF/view https://briarproject.org/manual/#:~:text=options%20that%20appear.-,Add%20contact%20at%20a%20distance,nickname%20for%20the%20new%20contact https://www.facebook.com/groups/266666542247953/?ref=share
друзі, алгоритми у Фейсбук перестали показувати мої пости багатьом із вас. хто бачить, будь ласка, поширте мій пост про розмовні клуби англійською..
https://www.patreon.com/posts/ekloga-seriia-11-60732926
Підписуємося на мою сторінку https://www.facebook.com/nazarov.nazarii
із "Семи оповідок для кардинала"
Photo, posted without a caption
фрагмент із книги: .... Голос був не надто жорстким, а радше ще юним, і я не йняв віри, що хтось із таким ніжним голосом може бути таким лихим… Хоча сповідувати не легко, і ніколи не ясно, хто грішніший, той, хто сповідує, чи той, хто сповідується. Може, самим гріхом є називання того, що має бути замовчане? Може, гріхом є спонукання такої розмови, що розбуджує таємні ділянки душі? Може, треба було б робити навпаки –…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @laviedeli. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 760,368 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Життя літератур” (@laviedeli), 46 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/laviedeli.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.