Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝐥𝐚 𝐯𝐢𝐚 𝐝𝐞𝐥𝐥𝐚 𝐥𝐮𝐜𝐞|отзывы

@laviadellaluce

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002409247743
TypeChannel
Username@laviadellaluce
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 25 February 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/laviadellaluce

Growth

312 Aug 2026, 10:04 — 3 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 14:18 — 3 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 10:0413 Aug 2026, 14:18
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2–4 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 14:183no change
12 Aug 2026, 10:043first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 25 February 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

12 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 91.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1191.7%
18.33%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 25 February 2025 to 14 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Mar 2025, 05:03 UTC95 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026

💕 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! лучшее кф в мире, я готов на него молиться ↩️ Свайпни для ответа.

🔥1

25 Feb 2025, 16:38 UTC133 views5 reactionsread 13 August 2026

💘 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! отзыв от Стефана великолепного ака кмс по куни. честно, зашел я в этот чат без какой-то особой надежды, так как обычно меня отовсюду кикали хуярили преды на мое имя. однако, оказалось, что первичное мнение было весьма ошибочное. и вот, я уже давно нахожусь здесь. уже не хочется называть кф просто чатом - это моя семья. атмосфера безумно дружелюбная, уютная, каждый день здесь что-

🔥41

25 Feb 2025, 15:05 UTC112 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026

🩷 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! если говорить честно это первый кф где мне было комфортно так как не было нигде ↩️ Свайпни для ответа.

🔥1

25 Feb 2025, 14:42 UTC89 viewsread 13 August 2026

💘 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! обожаю кф, родные мои любимые, го все лп😍😍 ↩️ Свайпни для ответа.

25 Feb 2025, 14:42 UTC94 viewsread 13 August 2026

💘 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! Вы лучшые мой любимки😍😍😍 ↩️ Свайпни для ответа.

25 Feb 2025, 13:46 UTC76 viewsread 13 August 2026

💕 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! Чпокала всех админов Любяяяяя 💋🍷 ↩️ Свайпни для ответа.

25 Feb 2025, 13:43 UTC50 viewsread 13 August 2026

💗 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! кф топ, админы топ, участники топ, правила топ, игры топ, развлечения топ, баны + преды ахуенны. пяти с пяти ↩️ Свайпни для ответа.

25 Feb 2025, 13:43 UTC54 viewsread 13 August 2026

💕 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! Кф топ, ТРАХАЛ ВСЕХ 😲😆 ↩️ Свайпни для ответа.

25 Feb 2025, 13:43 UTC65 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026

💘 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! кф семга слово поцана сто проц маратик бомба куни мой лп 10/10 ↩️ Свайпни для ответа.

🔥2

25 Feb 2025, 13:43 UTC63 viewsread 13 August 2026

💕 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! Кф хуйня 10/10 ↩️ Свайпни для ответа.

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @laviadellaluce. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,132,327 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐥𝐚 𝐯𝐢𝐚 𝐝𝐞𝐥𝐥𝐚 𝐥𝐮𝐜𝐞|отзывы” (@laviadellaluce), 3 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/laviadellaluce.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.