Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

⋅•⋅⊰∙∘☽ Бар "Lavamba" ☾∘∙⊱⋅•⋅

@lavamba

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

92subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001805470513
TypeChannel
Username@lavamba
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/lavamba

Growth

9212 Aug 2026, 21:18 — 92 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 17:58 — 92 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 21:1813 Aug 2026, 17:58
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 91–93 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 17:5892no change
12 Aug 2026, 21:1892first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

15 reactions across 6 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😢533.3%
custom 5375282786489880721320.0%
🕊320.0%
custom 537557844774356356916.67%
16.67%
🔥16.67%
😭16.67%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 May 2026 to 14 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Jun 2026, 19:41 UTC61 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Бар обречён.

😢5🕊1😭1

Signed ﹫𝑽𝒐𝗶𝗱𝒏𝒆𝘀𝘀.

10 Jun 2026, 10:56 UTC61 viewsread 12 August 2026

Я не умер, просто каждый июнь одно и тоже, ничего не хочу делать, а другие админы умерли 💜

Signed .💠D_𝕍𝕒𝕤𝕚𝕝𝕚𝕤𝕒_M🎩(🥖)(❦_𝕭𝖆𝖌𝖊𝖙𝖎𝖐_𝖘_𝖒𝖆𝖐𝖔𝖒_❦)he/she _𝘈𝘬𝘪𝘵𝘢_𝘞𝘰𝘭𝘧_ #многофункциональный_багет #ПошлиСмотретьИсчадие

30 May 2026, 18:17 UTC71 viewsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Сразу спрошу и тип игры, выбор за вами:

  1. Да, быстрая 🤩40%
  2. Да, долгая 🤩40%
  3. Не хотим 🤩20%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed Աυⲧρ𐔤ᥴ •·؟·•

29 May 2026, 12:29 UTC72 viewsread 12 August 2026

Решайте тут, после пойду делать волосы

Signed .💠D_𝕍𝕒𝕤𝕚𝕝𝕚𝕤𝕒_M🎩(🥖)(❦_𝕭𝖆𝖌𝖊𝖙𝖎𝖐_𝖘_𝖒𝖆𝖐𝖔𝖒_❦)he/she _𝘈𝘬𝘪𝘵𝘢_𝘞𝘰𝘭𝘧_ #многофункциональный_багет #ПошлиСмотретьИсчадие

25 May 2026, 10:05 UTC75 viewsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Цвет кожи

  1. Светлая44%
  2. Смуглая44%
  3. Тёмная11%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed .💠D_𝕍𝕒𝕤𝕚𝕝𝕚𝕤𝕒_M🎩(🥖)(❦_𝕭𝖆𝖌𝖊𝖙𝖎𝖐_𝖘_𝖒𝖆𝖐𝖔𝖒_❦)he/she _𝘈𝘬𝘪𝘵𝘢_𝘞𝘰𝘭𝘧_ #многофункциональный_багет #ПошлиСмотретьИсчадие

25 May 2026, 10:03 UTC58 viewsread 12 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed .💠D_𝕍𝕒𝕤𝕚𝕝𝕚𝕤𝕒_M🎩(🥖)(❦_𝕭𝖆𝖌𝖊𝖙𝖎𝖐_𝖘_𝖒𝖆𝖐𝖔𝖒_❦)he/she _𝘈𝘬𝘪𝘵𝘢_𝘞𝘰𝘭𝘧_ #многофункциональный_багет #ПошлиСмотретьИсчадие

25 May 2026, 10:03 UTC46 viewsread 12 August 2026

Доброго утра, пошла деать цвет кожи

Signed .💠D_𝕍𝕒𝕤𝕚𝕝𝕚𝕤𝕒_M🎩(🥖)(❦_𝕭𝖆𝖌𝖊𝖙𝖎𝖐_𝖘_𝖒𝖆𝖐𝖔𝖒_❦)he/she _𝘈𝘬𝘪𝘵𝘢_𝘞𝘰𝘭𝘧_ #многофункциональный_багет #ПошлиСмотретьИсчадие

22 May 2026, 18:45 UTC49 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Яки пол?

  1. Мужской25%
  2. Женский75%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

custom 53752827864898807211

Signed .💠D_𝕍𝕒𝕤𝕚𝕝𝕚𝕤𝕒_M🎩(🥖)(❦_𝕭𝖆𝖌𝖊𝖙𝖎𝖐_𝖘_𝖒𝖆𝖐𝖔𝖒_❦)he/she _𝘈𝘬𝘪𝘵𝘢_𝘞𝘰𝘭𝘧_ #многофункциональный_багет #ПошлиСмотретьИсчадие

22 May 2026, 13:48 UTC44 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

В какой гаче?

  1. Гача клуб33%
  2. Гача лайф 267%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🔥1

Signed .💠D_𝕍𝕒𝕤𝕚𝕝𝕚𝕤𝕒_M🎩(🥖)(❦_𝕭𝖆𝖌𝖊𝖙𝖎𝖐_𝖘_𝖒𝖆𝖐𝖔𝖒_❦)he/she _𝘈𝘬𝘪𝘵𝘢_𝘞𝘰𝘭𝘧_ #многофункциональный_багет #ПошлиСмотретьИсчадие

22 May 2026, 13:46 UTC40 viewsread 12 August 2026

Я дома дела сделал, поэтому ща начнём

Signed .💠D_𝕍𝕒𝕤𝕚𝕝𝕚𝕤𝕒_M🎩(🥖)(❦_𝕭𝖆𝖌𝖊𝖙𝖎𝖐_𝖘_𝖒𝖆𝖐𝖔𝖒_❦)he/she _𝘈𝘬𝘪𝘵𝘢_𝘞𝘰𝘭𝘧_ #многофункциональный_багет #ПошлиСмотретьИсчадие

18 May 2026, 12:13 UTC46 viewsread 12 August 2026

Опросик тут, голосуем

Signed .💠D_𝕍𝕒𝕤𝕚𝕝𝕚𝕤𝕒_M🎩(🥖)(❦_𝕭𝖆𝖌𝖊𝖙𝖎𝖐_𝖘_𝖒𝖆𝖐𝖔𝖒_❦)he/she _𝘈𝘬𝘪𝘵𝘢_𝘞𝘰𝘭𝘧_ #многофункциональный_багет #ПошлиСмотретьИсчадие

16 May 2026, 13:31 UTC47 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 53752827864898807212🕊1custom 53755784477435635691

Signed .💠D_𝕍𝕒𝕤𝕚𝕝𝕚𝕤𝕒_M🎩(🥖)(❦_𝕭𝖆𝖌𝖊𝖙𝖎𝖐_𝖘_𝖒𝖆𝖐𝖔𝖒_❦)he/she _𝘈𝘬𝘪𝘵𝘢_𝘞𝘰𝘭𝘧_ #многофункциональный_багет #ПошлиСмотретьИсчадие

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @lavamba. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 7 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

30 May 2026, 18:17 UTCAnonymous Poll10 voters

Сразу спрошу и тип игры, выбор за вами:

  1. Да, быстрая 🤩40%
  2. Да, долгая 🤩40%
  3. Не хотим 🤩20%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 May 2026, 10:05 UTCAnonymous Poll9 voters

Цвет кожи

  1. Светлая44%
  2. Смуглая44%
  3. Тёмная11%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

22 May 2026, 18:45 UTCFinal Results8 voters

Яки пол?

  1. Мужской25%
  2. Женский75%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

22 May 2026, 13:48 UTCFinal Results6 voters

В какой гаче?

  1. Гача клуб33%
  2. Гача лайф 267%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

15 May 2026, 12:18 UTCFinal Results6 voters

Во что?

  1. Хуманизация17%
  2. Раскраска17%
  3. Ос по0%
  4. Создаём ос вместе50%
  5. Добавь себя17%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

13 May 2026, 08:02 UTCAnonymous Poll5 voters

Что будете хуманизировать?

  1. Украшений60%
  2. Фобий0%
  3. Предметов20%
  4. Растения/цветов20%
  5. Предмета0%
  6. Сами решайте0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 May 2026 to 14 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,277,795 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“⋅•⋅⊰∙∘☽ Бар "Lavamba" ☾∘∙⊱⋅•⋅” (@lavamba), 92 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lavamba.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.