Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
13 measurements spanning 37 days, net -32. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,320–1,362 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Sept 2026, 05:19
1,325
-4
8 Sept 2026, 08:02
1,329
-4
3 Sept 2026, 09:06
1,333
-2
31 Aug 2026, 11:53
1,335
-6
28 Aug 2026, 04:42
1,341
+1
25 Aug 2026, 07:45
1,340
-1
22 Aug 2026, 01:44
1,341
-4
19 Aug 2026, 04:55
1,345
-2
16 Aug 2026, 14:12
1,347
-4
13 Aug 2026, 03:16
1,351
-4
9 Aug 2026, 17:51
1,355
-2
6 Aug 2026, 11:49
1,357
no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:50
1,357
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 21 February 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 February 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
369 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
168
45.5%
👍
67
18.2%
🔥
59
16.0%
😁
30
8.13%
👏
22
5.96%
🥰
10
2.71%
😢
8
2.17%
🎉
3
0.813%
🤯
2
0.542%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 369 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 21 February 2023 to 28 February 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
This is my last post on here as I wont be using social media after today 🥳
From now on I’ll be sharing access to new and exclusive content via my mailing list
If you’d like to receive, click this link to my website www.laurajanebolton.com
After a few seconds you’ll see a pop-up which enables you to join my mailing list.
You can also join my Patreon channel. It’s like a personal social media channel, where you can…
We are relational beings. In my personal experience, and having coached and supported many others, I’ve concluded that the people you have in your life - both personal relationships and those who’s content you consume online - is the biggest (external) influencing factor on your quality of life and how you experience it. Choose carefully 💗
Messaging apps PLUS social media - all the information, comments, messages, & notifications. It completely goes against what we are naturally designed for as humans. And its one of the main reasons most people feel overwhelmed, drained and miserable.
I’m simplifying my life. I’m slowing down.
I’m in a process of letting go of all thats not aligned, and doesn’t serve me.
I’m working to minimise my tech use (as you …
Spot on
Ive been saying this for ages.
Peoples behaviour says alot.
In terms of those who engage with the fear/drama porn: For some its an avoidance mechanism, and easier to focus on "out there", on what “they” are doing, and how terrible it is, than it is to take personal responsibility and focus within and on our own lives and community. Also as I said in a post yesterday, alot of people are (unconsciously) emot…
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @laurajanebolton. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Laura Jane Bolton” (@laurajanebolton), 1,325 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/laurajanebolton.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
