Говорим о кино.
№ 7861743153
По всем вопросам: @ms_fonbaron
По peклaме: @Diggsale
Купить рекламу через биржу: https://telega.in/c/potom_posmotryu
4930906833
Created
Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,984–14,009 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 17:47
13,987
-4
12 Aug 2026, 13:07
13,991
-6
11 Aug 2026, 13:02
13,997
-7
10 Aug 2026, 13:22
14,004
-2
9 Aug 2026, 11:52
14,006
+17
8 Aug 2026, 13:38
13,989
-4
7 Aug 2026, 14:31
13,993
no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:21
13,993
first reading
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.38%
avg views ÷ 13,987 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,030
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.01%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 14 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held
14 (29 July 2026 – 13 August 2026)
Views total
14,450
Reactions total
291
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Aug 2026, 22:48 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈4,400
Videos
≈62
Links
≈1,090
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1m 32s
Average length
31s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
291 reactions across 14 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤🔥
61
21.0%
🔥
57
19.6%
✍
46
15.8%
👍
40
13.7%
😁
18
6.19%
🤯
14
4.81%
💔
10
3.44%
👏
8
2.75%
💯
8
2.75%
💋
7
2.41%
🏆
6
2.06%
🍓
4
1.37%
🍾
4
1.37%
👀
3
1.03%
😴
2
0.687%
🌚
1
0.344%
💘
1
0.344%
🥰
1
0.344%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 291reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
"Что гложет Гилберта Грейпа" (What's Eating Gilbert Grape), 1993
Гилберт Грейп живет в штате Айова, в крошечном городке с населением в тысячу жителей. У него две сестры, слабоумный брат и толстуха-мать. Гилберт тянет лямку в магазине и крутит роман с замужней дамой. Но все меняется, когда в городок приезжает красивая молодая женщина по имени Беки.
Главная роль в картине досталась молодому Джонни Деппу, который …
"Трещины" (Cracks), 2009
Психологическая драма рассказывает мрачную, чувственную историю о взрослении, обожании, ревности и разрушительных иллюзиях в закрытом пансионе.
За стенами элитной школы-интерната девочки занимаются в команде по плаванию и буквально боготворят свою преподавательницу, загадочную и харизматичную мисс Джи. Внимание учительницы переключается на Фиамму, новую ученицу, приехавшую из экзотической и…
В фильме «Привидение» ужасающие звуки, издаваемые теневыми демонами, на самом деле - это звуки плача младенцев, играемые задом наперед с очень медленной скоростью.
КиноФакт 📌
"Четыре хороших дня" (Four Good Days), 2020
Молли пытается совладать с наркозависимостью при поддержке своей матери Деб. Они долгое время не общались и теперь должны вместе пережить все травмы, которые нанесли друг другу.
Мила Кунис, которую здесь просто не узнать под слоем грима и болезненной худобы, играет в паре с оскароносной Гленн Клоуз, создавая пугающе реалистичный и болезненный дуэт матери и дочери.
…
"Последний танец" (Last Dance), 1996
Между молодым адвокатом и его первой подзащитной, приговоренной к смертной казни, возникает и крепнет дружба. Но срок приведения приговора в исполнение — все ближе и ближе.
Психологический триллер режиссёра Брюса Бересфорда с Шэрон Стоун и Рэнди Куэйдом в главных ролях. Шэрон Стоун здесь совсем не та роковая красотка, к которой мы привыкли после «Основного инстинкта» — её …
Мэтту Дэймону на премьере фильма «Одиссея» досталась необычная просьба — автограф на картофелине 😁
Всё из-за его роли в «Марсианине», где он выживал на Красной планете, питаясь картошкой. Кстати, картине уже 11 лет — время, как и в том фильме, неумолимо летит.
КиноФакт 📌
"Ограды" (Fences), 2016
Бывший бейсболист афро-американского происхождения, теперь собирающий мусор с улиц Питтсбурга, изо всех сил старается обеспечить свою семью в Америке 1950-х, где расовый вопрос все еще остается открытым.
Мощная драма с четырьмя номинациями на «Оскар».
Весь фильм держится на невероятном дуэте Дензела Вашингтона и Виолы Дэвис, которые настолько вросли в свои роли, что ты забываешь, что э…
✍8🔥5❤🔥4🌚1👀1💋1💯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @later_watch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 13 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ПОТОМ ПОСМОТРЮ | ФИЛЬМЫ И СЕРИАЛЫ” (@later_watch), 13,987 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/later_watch.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
