Posted without readable text
🔥7👍3👏2❤1🤯1

Channel
@latam_1winaff
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,696subscribers
-22 since we began measuring on 27 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002050025756 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @latam_1winaff |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 27 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/latam_1winaff |
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 10:37 | 1,696 | -6 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 09:00 | 1,702 | -9 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 01:38 | 1,711 | -15 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 19:19 | 1,726 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 17:36 | 1,727 | +9 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 22:00 | 1,718 | no change |
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:45 | 1,718 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (22 July 2026 – 27 August 2026) |
| Views total | 727 |
| Reactions total | 52 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Aug 2026, 22:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
403 reactions across 20 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 134 | 33.3% | |
| ❤ | 82 | 20.3% | |
| 👍 | 63 | 15.6% | |
| 🎉 | 29 | 7.20% | |
| 👏 | 29 | 7.20% | |
| 🤩 | 24 | 5.96% | |
| ✍ | 13 | 3.23% | |
| 🏆 | 7 | 1.74% | |
| 😱 | 6 | 1.49% | |
| 🤯 | 6 | 1.49% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 1.49% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 0.993% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 403 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Posted without readable text
🔥7👍3👏2❤1🤯1
Posted without readable text
🔥10🤩6👍3
🔥 Chile — un GEO de alta conversión con gran potencial para escalar Una audiencia activa, métricas estables del funnel y grandes oportunidades de crecimiento hacen de Chile un GEO atractivo tanto para realizar pruebas como para escalar tráfico Nuestros affiliate managers han preparado una guía detallada sobre cómo entrar al mercado y escalar tu tráfico con éxito — lee la guía completa: 🟤 Qué estrategias de tráfico…
🔥11👍4🤩3❤1
❤ ¡Ya tenemos a nuestros ganadores! ¡Felicidades a @Rowlions, @alejandroats y @Parlito79! Sus guantes exclusivos firmados por el peleador de UFC Ignacio Bahamondes ya van rumbo a ustedes 💲 Gracias a todos por participar ¿Quieres volver a intentarlo? Estamos realizando un nuevo sorteo en nuestro Instagram por unos guantes firmados por Ilia Topuria — visita nuestro perfil y participa ⚡
🔥11👍4🎉3🏆3👏1🤩1
💲 2 entradas Platinum para SiGMA North America 2026 ¿Quieres vivir uno de los eventos más destacados del iGaming en Norteamérica junto a 1win Partners? Estamos sorteando 2 entradas Platinum para SiGMA North America 2026 Todos los detalles para participar están disponibles en nuestro canal de WhatsApp ➕ Únete a 1win Partners en WhatsApp ⚫ Nuestra Web ⚫ TG chat
🔥7🎉6🤩6❤1
⚡ De las pruebas al escalado: un sistema de lanzamiento de tráfico para iGaming Hemos publicado un artículo completo sobre cómo gestionar de forma sistemática tus campañas, desde la fase inicial de pruebas hasta alcanzar la escala completa ¿Qué encontrarás en el artículo? ⚫ Criterios claros para pausar o escalar campañas basados en el coste objetivo de FTD y los benchmarks del funnel ⚫ Estrategias de escalado espec…
❤12👍7🔥5👏4✍1😁1
🔥 ¿Listo para llevar tu crecimiento al siguiente nivel? Los grandes resultados empiezan con la colaboración adecuada. En 1win Partners, ayudamos a los afiliados ambiciosos a escalar más rápido con un fuerte soporte, experiencia global en GEOs y oportunidades para crecer juntos ⚡ Construye con un partner que piensa en grande. Únete a 1win Partners hoy ⚫ Nuestra Web ⚫ TG chat
❤7🔥6🎉4
Video message, posted without a caption
🥰6👍4🤩4
🔊 Un nuevo ícono llega al club VIP de 1win Nicky Jam, una de las figuras más reconocidas de la música latina, ya es parte de nuestra comunidad exclusiva De grandes éxitos internacionales a nuevas experiencias — una nueva historia comienza 🔥 Más grandes nombres llegan a 1win. ¡No te lo pierdas! ⚫ Nuestra Web ⚫ TG chat
🔥26❤6👍5😱5🤩3👏2
💲 Mejores GEOs para campañas CPA Hemos preparado el último resumen de GEOs con los mercados donde estamos listos para aceptar y comprar cualquier volumen de tráfico 🟤 Chile Click2Reg — 20% Reg2Dep — 35% 🟤 Colombia Click2Reg — 30% Reg2Dep — 23% 🟤 Brasil Click2Reg — 19% Reg2Dep — 13% 🟤 Malasia Click2Reg — 23% Reg2Dep — 22% 🟤 Corea del Sur Click2Reg — 25% Reg2Dep — 22% ¿Listo para lanzar nuevas campañas? Contacta…
✍7🔥7❤3👍2🎉1😁1
Queda un lugar libre en el garaje de tus sueños
The shares total 118%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❤9✍5🎉3
Posted without readable text
🔥6👏4👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @latam_1winaff. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Queda un lugar libre en el garaje de tus sueños
The shares total 118%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 27 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“1win Partners Latino” (@latam_1winaff), 1,696 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/latam_1winaff.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.