Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Trx-KYC-Esim请认准蓝精灵

Channel

Trx-KYC-Esim请认准蓝精灵

@lanjinglingeism

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,124subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 18 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003445363273
TypeChannel
Username@lanjinglingeism
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded18 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 25 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/lanjinglingeism

Growth

1,1191,1241,121.518 August 2026 — 1,120 subscribers18 August 2026 — 1,120 subscribers18 August 2026 — 1,119 subscribers22 August 2026 — 1,124 subscribers18 August 202622 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,118–1,125 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 19:291,124+5
18 Aug 2026, 23:321,119-1
18 Aug 2026, 19:151,120no change
18 Aug 2026, 19:001,120first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 11 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
45.4%
avg views ÷ 1,124 subscribers
Avg views / post
510
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026
Posts held19 (11 June 202618 August 2026)
Views total2,039
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Aug 2026, 19:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

3 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍266.7%
133.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC167 viewsread 18 August 2026
Photo

粗柳簸萁细柳斗 世上谁嫌男人丑 蓝精灵祝大家七夕快乐! 业务咨询 @LJL168888

12 Aug 2026, 13:23 UTC359 views0 reactionsread 18 August 2026

所有股票接盘,以盘面数据为准!假票或者盘面数据没有的,还有用虚拟买票的,就不用试探了! @LJL168888

4 Aug 2026, 02:01 UTC804 viewsread 18 August 2026
Photo

港股收量,港股收量,港股收量! @LJL168888

28 Jul 2026, 15:54 UTC709 viewsread 18 August 2026
Photo

港股收量! 速来,速来!😀😀😀 @LJL168888

25 Jul 2026, 13:09 UTC849 viewsread 18 August 2026

欧洲 台日韩 各种礼品券 / 代购 支付 各类通道资源 皆可询问 ! @LJL168888

21 Jul 2026, 03:39 UTC787 views1 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Sec是全球最权威的证券监管机构拥有sec相当于获得“全球最高级别金融信任背书” 在全球投资人眼里: SEC ≈ 美国金融合规天花板 比普通公司可信 比“自称合规”的平台高一个维度 对海外投资人尤其有杀伤力 可以公开、合理地“讲投资故事” 合法“碰客户的钱”(最核心) 美国msb: 只要你的业务涉及: 代收 / 代付 出入金 法币 ↔ 加密 钱包 / 托管 / 结算 👉 MSB 是合法前提 📌 拥有MSB = 有证金融业务,客户可以放心的在你的平台交易 拥有msb 你可以理直气壮地跟客户说: 我们遵循 AML / KYC 我们是 FinCEN 注册 MSB 资金流有合规框架 这在谈合作、谈客户时,非常有用 msb官方网站可查 需要做SEC牌照 MSB牌照的老板看一下 咨询 @LJL168888

1

19 Jul 2026, 14:41 UTC≈3,220 viewsread 18 August 2026

⭐️此频道可以关注!有需要接盘票!香港卡!TRX会员兑换!支付对接等问题都可以联系蓝精灵 @lanjinglingeism

19 Jul 2026, 14:15 UTC737 views2 reactionsread 18 August 2026

港股收量,下周有标!懂的来! @LJL168888

👍2

9 Jul 2026, 09:21 UTC925 viewsread 18 August 2026
Photo

🕹手动指令笔数(一小时内有效) 1️⃣点击【充值余额】,充值U或者TRX 2️⃣点击【绑定地址】输入你的地址 4️⃣每次转 U 前,先给机器人发指令 📝 使用方法:(发给机器人指令): • 发 01 ➝ 1 笔 • 发 02 ➝ 2 笔 • 发 03 ➝ 3 笔 • 发 04 ➝ 4 笔 • 发 05 ➝ 5 笔 💰 价格:1 笔 = 3 TRX (U价按 TRX实时汇率换算) 🟢 [不用不扣|用前发指令] ⚠️注意事项: 🔺发完指令1小时内进行转账 🔺(对方没U或交易所,需要两笔) ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 👉点击发送 /start 可更新最新功能列表! 24小时机器人🤖🤖 @lanjingling168888_bot

1 Jul 2026, 01:36 UTC933 views0 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

“十年酬尽英雄泪 一朝问道轩辕巅”

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @lanjinglingeism. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 368,099 of 1,620,455entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Trx-KYC-Esim请认准蓝精灵” (@lanjinglingeism), 1,124 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lanjinglingeism.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.