Channel
@lanagord_ru
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
7subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002344942295 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lanagord_ru |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 January 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lanagord_ru |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:30 | 7 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 04:45 | 7 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 31 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
2 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 31 January 2025 to 19 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Денежный экстаз: Разреши себе получать столько, сколько хочешь! 💰 Ты мечтаешь о доходе в 100 000, 500 000 или даже 1 миллион? А внутри звучит: «Я не готов… Мне это не по плечу… Это не для меня! Я не справлюсь...» Хватит обманывать себя! За этими фразами всегда скрывается одна‑единственная мысль: 👉 «МНЕ НЕЛЬЗЯ!» Почему так происходит? 🧠 Мозг так устроен, что создан не для роста, а для безопасности! Если деньги у т…
Про правила📖 Сегодня попалось видео с диетологом Алексеем Ковальковым. У него спросили: "Как вы относитесь к еде после 18:00?" На что он ответил:"А что с едой после 18:00?" И тогда ведущая начала удивленно обсуждать, что говорят же после 18:00ч не нужно кушать - правило такое. И тогда он спросил: "А Кеми эти правила установлены или придуманы?" Естественно, ведущая была в замешательстве... Когда я проходила обучен…
❤2
Есть "инструменты" для самостоятельной работы по 5 шагам для реализации вашего желания?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
#шаг5 В квантовом пространстве перешла из точки А в точку Б (желаемые события) и на следующий день получаю своё желание⛲ Вы можете пройти эти шаги самостоятельно, если владеете каким-то техниками. Но я вас буду вести с помощью гипносесии.
#шаг4 Подключила энергию изобилия Чаще всего энергии на исполнение желания не достаточно, поэтому это необходимо!
#шаг3 Самопрограммирование помогает не возвращаться в прошлое, а удерживаться в желаемой реальности
#шаг2 Убрала все шаблоны, связки, негативные мысли и убеждения, которые я взяла или присвоила себе от социума, родственников, ДНК. Всё, что касалось того, что: у меня не получится не сбудется очередная фигня у кого угодно, но только не у меня все врут поздно, что-то менять не способна не достойна Я себя настолько почувствовала изувеченной, подстроенной под разные системы и людей, жила по правилам родителей и общес…
Voice message, posted without a caption
#шаг1 Я сделала сдвиг/смещение/переход в квантовом пространстве.
КЛЮЧ К АЛГОРИТМУ РАБОТЫ С ПОДСОЗНАНИЕМ🗝 1,5 года я тестировала различные практики, чтобы изменить свою реальность, свою жизнь - ощутить материальные изменения. Вижу много информации, что нужно стать тем кем хочешь и это случится... Но почему-то не случалось, по крайней мере, у меня! Как я пришла к тем самым изменениям, расскажу по шагам и их всего 5.
Интересна программа тренинга?
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Хотите получать желаемое без длительных "проработок"?
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @lanagord_ru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Есть "инструменты" для самостоятельной работы по 5 шагам для реализации вашего желания?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Интересна программа тренинга?
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Хотите получать желаемое без длительных "проработок"?
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 31 January 2025 to 19 January 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Лана Горд” (@lanagord_ru), 7 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lanagord_ru.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.