4 measurements spanning 10 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,319–2,322 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 20:52
2,322
+2
7 Aug 2026, 04:13
2,320
+1
6 Aug 2026, 11:30
2,319
no change
6 Aug 2026, 11:25
2,319
first reading
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
30.2%
avg views ÷ 2,322 subscribers
Avg views / post
702
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.98%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 10 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
10 (14 July 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
4,912
Reactions total
441
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 16:40 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
621 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
221
35.6%
❤
124
20.0%
👀
104
16.7%
👍
76
12.2%
🤯
58
9.34%
🤣
25
4.03%
💩
12
1.93%
👎
1
0.161%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 621reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 10 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lana_sator. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Термальные источники Benje около городка Пермет существенно преобразились за два года - был один большой бассейн (первая фотка) и парочка мелких, теперь большой превратился в двухуровневый, а вокруг появилось ещё штуки 4 поменьше (из них три - выше по реке, т.е. перед мостом). Вода прозрачная во всех, кроме верхней части сдвоенного, народу умеренно, посещение по-прежнему бесплатное! Говорят, какой-то местный олигарх/…
Помните, показывала водонапорку в море?
Была там уже много раз, но сегодня впервые погода располагала к тому, чтобы залезть в воду - ни ветра, ни мощных волн! Оказалось, что до башни даже не нужно плыть - можно дойти по дну, там везде гладкий песочек и никаких подвохов, а глубина на пути максимум по шею. Так что получилось сделать фотки вблизи и потрогать башню за ногу, даже не намочив телефон 😁
Недавно обнаружили, что в Албании помимо кучи привычных сезонных фруктов и ягод (шелковица, виноград, черешня, инжир, гранаты, фиги, цитрусовые, мушмула, хурма, земляника, клубника, ежевика, алыча, слива, яблоки, груши, арбузы и дыни, киви и т.д.) растёт маракуйя! Это лиана, она такая вьющаяся очень густая и плотная. Нашли её на заборе какого-то частного дома, уже несколько раз ходили подъедать. До этого я только её …
в Албании продаются неожиданно крупные и неожиданно маленькие баночки колы, причём цена почти одинаковая (70 и 50)
баночку 0,5 я более чем могу понять жарким летом
а вот 0,15 это видимо чтобы что-то запивать из продающегося возле кассы в маленьких стеклянных ёмкостях 😁
История про албанский сервис
После трёх лет использования в мобильнике завял аккумулятор. Ну то есть, его хватает на день-полтора, если в мобилу особо не тыкать, и на половину дня, если тыкать. Если ещё и с навигацией, то часа за 3 превратится в тыкву. Менять телефон не хочу (советовать не надо) - но вот подумала, не поменять ли батарейку? К тому же, у конкретно этого телефона (самсунг s-серии, не какой-то ноунейм) …
На сегодня был назначен очередной суд, но мы на него не поехали, т.к. было почти очевидно, что снова всё перенесут. И перенесли - на этот раз всего на пару недель! А мы зато сэкономили по 20 евро на человека и избежали необходимости почти целый день кататься на автобусах.
Уже устала рассказывать про весь этот цирк, но в этот раз отличились адвокаты: целый месяц ничего не писали, а вечером накануне суда (который в 10…
Ещё одно место в Тиране (помимо музея животных) куда можно сходить за 50 лек, - ботанический сад!
Это, конечно, не советский вариант с огромными зарослями и кучей теплиц с коллекциями редких растений. Албанский ботанический сад похож скорее на парк, а теплица всего одна и та небольшая (в ней много кактусов, суккулентов, а ещё есть стыдливая мимоза, которая складывает листики, когда её трогаешь).
Парк частично ухож…
👍25❤15🔥4🤯2
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @lana_sator. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 647,388 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Албанские истории” (@lana_sator), 2,322 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lana_sator.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
