Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Лана Куликовская | Свободный код состояний 🗝

Channel

Лана Куликовская | Свободный код состояний 🗝

@lana_kulikovskaya

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

88subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001095623888
TypeChannel
Username@lana_kulikovskaya
CreatedBetween 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/lana_kulikovskaya

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 27 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

8890897 August 2026 — 90 subscribers9 August 2026 — 90 subscribers9 September 2026 — 89 subscribers16 September 2026 — 88 subscribers7 August 202616 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 40 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 88–90 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 08:1888-1
9 Sept 2026, 11:3989-1
9 Aug 2026, 14:3290no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:2390first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 3 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 03s
Average length
32s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

189 reactions across 16 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥7338.6%
😁4523.8%
❤2312.2%
👍115.82%
🙏115.82%
🥰115.82%
💯94.76%
😢42.12%
🤯21.06%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 189 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 3 November 2025 to 3 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 18 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lana_kulikovskaya. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 November 2025 to 3 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Jul 2026, 08:42 UTC45 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Есть только 2 состояния. Дефицита и профицита. Остальные - производные от них

🙏4🔥3💯2

3 Jul 2026, 08:16 UTC45 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Ошибка - это подсказка, т.е. ресурс

👍4🙏4🔥1

3 Jul 2026, 07:21 UTC47 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Если застрял и не знаешь куда идти 1. Сделай карт-схему всех возможных шагов 2. Исключи те, которые точно "нет" 3. Посмотри на оставшиеся. Уже видны некоторые шаги, которые точно "да" 4. Отметь их, становятся видны новые те, которые "нет" 5. Если еще не видны "да" и есть развилка, то просчитай риски каждого оставшегося варианта и сделай тот шаг, где риски меньше и ты сможешь в принципе легко разгрести последстви…

🔥5❤1

24 Jun 2026, 18:27 UTC83 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Милоты в ленту в середине недели)

🥰8😁6👍1🔥1

16 May 2026, 09:23 UTC114 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026

АПД И что ты думаешь? Мне снова попалась кинза! И я сожрала ее с удовольствием! 😁 Ни на что не намекаю)))

🔥8😁4❤1

5 May 2026, 16:44 UTC115 views19 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Кинза и провокативка Терапия - это не только когда «все рушится». Иногда это когда «все зашибись, но хочется еще чуточку лучше» 😉 Примерно так и начался наш диалог. Запрос звучал почти как бытовой анекдот: «Как бы мне начать переносить запах сливочного масла? Ну чтоб не затыкать нос и не подташнивать». Это не то, с чем обычно идут в терапию. С этим можно жить, к этому можно привыкнуть и выработать свои стратегии …

🔥9❤6😁4

28 Apr 2026, 08:23 UTC98 views14 reactions6 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Сделала вчера шуточный опрос среди друзей. Если бы у Весны было настроение, то какое оно сегодня? Ответы: - Оригинальное😁 - Пойти против ожиданий всех, типа бунтарское - Кто-то ее заебал 😂😂 что она настолько решила охладеть - Мне на этот вопрос сейчас приходит только слово «дристательное» - Из прошлой жизни, где она была суровой штормовой зимой А вы что думаете про ее настроение? 😀

😁9🔥3👍2

5 Apr 2026, 08:36 UTC101 views4 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @cgeventPhoto

Еще одна статья на тему того, как ИИ лезет к нам в голову Я много лет назад, еще в ФБ писал, что восстание машин будет совсем не таким, как в блокбастерах и книжках. Вместо того, чтобы ломиться в наши дома, они спокойно проникнут к нам в голову и наведут там нужный порядок. Ну и все. Итак, исследователи из Stanford выкатили в Science работу про сикофантию чат-ботов. Тема не новая, но это уже не твиты Альтмана, а пр…

👍2🔥1😁1

27 Mar 2026, 16:31 UTC98 views13 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Photo

Нарцисс (да-да, ты сейчас подумал “это не про меня”. Расслабься, именно с этого все и начинается😊) ___ Грандиозный Это тот самый человек, который не просто заходит в комнату - он в нее ВХОДИТ. С ощущением, что сейчас здесь станет намного лучше. Потому что ОН пришел. Он умный. Он чувствует больше. Он видит глубже. И, конечно, слегка недооценен этими… ну ты понял. Кто не д’Артаньяны... В терапию он приходит не за …

🔥5❤3😢3💯2

7 Mar 2026, 09:45 UTC91 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Десятилетия - чтобы научиться страдать. Одна встреча - чтобы перестать. Десятилетия - чтобы решиться.

💯5🔥4❤3🤯2😢1

5 Mar 2026, 07:06 UTC93 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @trancemasters

Память тела и истоки сознания Исследование, опубликованное в журнале Nature Communications, показало интересную вещь: клетки нашего тела способны "запоминать" сигналы. Причём речь идёт не о нейронах мозга, а о самых обычных клетках — например, клетках почек. Учёные обнаружили, что если клетка получает один сильный сигнал, она реагирует слабее, чем если получает несколько более слабых сигналов с паузами между ними. …

🔥4😁2❤1

5 Mar 2026, 07:06 UTC86 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Поделюсь от постом от коллег. И может кому-то станет понятнее, почему регулярная терапия и практики-домашки эффективнее разовых "заскоков" к терапевту, и что идет "переучивание" в безопасной обстановке и почему в итоге количество регулярное переходит в качество. И что экспонента зависит и от количества предыдущего опыта, и от регулярности нового.

❤4

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @lana_kulikovskaya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Лана Куликовская | Свободный код состояний 🗝” (@lana_kulikovskaya), 88 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lana_kulikovskaya.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.