5 measurements spanning 6 days, net +24. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,759–5,791 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 13:27
5,787
+9
10 Aug 2026, 17:04
5,778
+13
7 Aug 2026, 13:20
5,765
+2
7 Aug 2026, 02:15
5,763
no change
7 Aug 2026, 02:04
5,763
first reading
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
29.9%
avg views ÷ 5,787 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,730
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.83%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
16 (5 August 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
27,660
Reactions total
1,060
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 03:52 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
39s
Average length
13s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,060 reactions across 16 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
268
25.3%
🤮
256
24.2%
custom 5337197975741431975
173
16.3%
🔥
145
13.7%
🤡
56
5.28%
❤🔥
33
3.11%
👍
32
3.02%
🙏
27
2.55%
👎
18
1.70%
🤩
15
1.42%
💯
9
0.849%
🍾
8
0.755%
😁
7
0.66%
🥴
4
0.377%
👌
2
0.189%
😡
2
0.189%
🍓
1
0.094%
💊
1
0.094%
💘
1
0.094%
🗿
1
0.094%
1 further kind
1
0.094%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,060reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎯IOF рассматривает введение чемпионатов по ночному ориентированию
Из протокола заседания совета IOF 6-8 июля 2026:
Linda Take (LT) представила отчет о работе над ночным ориентированием как потенциальном формате чемпионатов в будущем. Совет отметил, что планы все еще находятся на ранней стадии, и предоставил первоначальные отзывы. Совет продолжит обсуждение на будущих заседаниях.
💡Предложить новость
🇳🇴Якоб Ингебригтсен завоевал четвертый подряд титул чемпиона Европы в беге на 5000 метров, пробежав за 13:15.29. Забег состоялся вчера вечером в Бирмингеме.
Ингебригтсен вернулся спустя 11 месяцев после операции на ахилловом сухожилии.
В забеге принимал участие финский ориентировщик, призёр чемпионатов мира, Туомас Хейккиля, он занял 13-ое место с результатом 13:30.64.
💡Предложить новость
🇵🇱В эти дни в Польше проходит чемпионат мира среди ветеранов по ориентированию бегом.
В субботу в Пшеворске состоялась квалификация спринта, на следующий день финалы прошли в Жешуве.
Завтра состоится квалификация лесных дисциплин, в среду – финал средней, в пятницу – финал длинной дистанции.
🇵🇱Сайт WMOC 2026
🎯Результаты финала спринта
🎯Первенство России (МЖ16/14) в Москве
😊Зеленоград
🔸9 августа, кросс – эстафета – 3 человека
🎯Результаты онлайн
🎯Страница соревнований
💡Предложить новость
🎯Третий этап Кубка мира 2026
😊Чехия, г. Вишши-Брод
Средняя, финал
Мужчины, 5,4 км, 22◪
Женщины, 4,5 км, 18◪
Страница соревнований | IOF LIVE | результаты онлайн | GPS
🎯Иван Мостепанов о спринте WUOC 2026🇵🇹
Иван Мостепанов известен в России как планировщик и автор городских карт. Недавно в Португалии прошёл чемпионат мира среди студентов, на котором Иван, последние несколько лет проживающий в Португалии, был планировщиком спринта. Мы попросили Ивана рассказать подробнее об этом опыте.
В Португалии меня хорошо знают. В декабре, как увидел, что чемпионат мира добавили на платформу …
Команда Dлительный приглашает на свой главный старт — Аристомед о-викенд 😎
15-16 августа, Сосновый бор.
В программе:
🤑классика (квалификация)
🤑ночной спринт
🤑классика (финал)
Два дня вблизи пляжа, три дистанции, середина финального месяца лета. Как и в прошлом году, для групп МЖ21 есть призовые наличкой.
1 место — 20 000 р.
2 место — 15 000 р.
3 место — 10 000 р.
Для других возрастных групп готовим призы от партне…
🎯Полигон первенства России (МЖ16/14) в Москве
Соревнования стартуют завтра с классической дистанции
💡Предложить новость
🤮36❤32🔥12🍾5❤🔥2👌2
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @lamporient. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 219,309 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Referenced elsewhere
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Gleb Tikhonov(en.wikipedia.org) “…[[FootO]] Junior World Orienteering Championships.{{cite web |url=https://t.me/lamporient/1237 |title=Ламповое ориентирование |trans-title=Valve orienteering…” read 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ламповое ориентирование” (@lamporient), 5,787 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lamporient.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
