Почему твой трек никто не слушает? 😏
🔥3custom 54721464623620488181

Channel
@lampmusic_tg
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
2,371subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001283706350 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lampmusic_tg |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lampmusic_tg |
Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 10:17 | 2,371 | +2 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 05:18 | 2,369 | +2 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 22:21 | 2,367 | -2 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 11:55 | 2,369 | -1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:17 | 2,370 | +1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 13:15 | 2,369 | -3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 20:54 | 2,372 | +1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 00:06 | 2,371 | +1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 01:06 | 2,370 | -4 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:52 | 2,374 | -4 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:00 | 2,378 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:47 | 2,378 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 21 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
228 reactions across 17 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 158 | 69.3% | |
| custom 5472146462362048818 | 29 | 12.7% | |
| 👍 | 19 | 8.33% | |
| 😁 | 15 | 6.58% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 3.07% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 228 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 January 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Почему твой трек никто не слушает? 😏
🔥3custom 54721464623620488181
Наконец-то запускаем то, что многие артисты давно просили 🎥 Представляем Вам новый, улучшенный формат создания и постинга видеороликов! Теперь это не просто публикация коротких видео в TikTok, Reels и Shorts. Мы добавили креативные нейро-ролики, мини-клипы, липсинг, mood-видео, чтобы ролики были еще вайбовее, качественнее и разнообразнее! 🎞 Новый формат называется «Креативный постинг» 🎞 Сейчас возможности для не…
🔥7
Где музыканты зарабатывают больше всего?
🔥4
TikTok снова ожил! Видео наконец-то пошли в рекомендации! 🚀 Заметили, что в последнее время просмотры в ТТ встали колом? У многих ролики вообще перестали попадать в рекомендации, и охваты замерли на нуле. Кажется, что старые методы больше не катят. Но мы не опустили руки, сутками тестировали различные связки и подходы. И мы это сделали! Нащупали рабочие алгоритмы, благодаря которым видео снова начали попадать в …
🔥3
Применяешь ИИ в творчестве/работе?
The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Пилим свою платформу 💪 Разработка идет полным ходом) Будет круто, реально! Держу в курсе 🤩
🔥18custom 54721464623620488187👏3
Многих пугают блокировки. Увы, но и наше мини приложение в тг работает уже не так хорошо, как до замедления тг. Без сервиса из 3-х букв стало сложнее, хоть и сервер нашего приложения расположен в России. Ну и давай признаемся честно, наше приложение давно требует изменений. Оно не такое удобное, как тебе (и мне) бы хотелось. Хотя в прошлом году я потратил на его создание больше 3-х месяцев) Это было сложно, кропотли…
🔥25👍3👏2
Если что, мы не планируем уходить из тг) Будем постить контент и дальше) А ты уже в Макс перешел? Или в ВК? Без квн тг сейчас практически не грузит, можно сказать, что блокировка фактически состоялась
🔥21custom 54721464623620488187👍4
Уже удалил запрещенные слова из своих песен?) Закон действует с 1 марта. Проверь все свои треки, даже косвенные напоминания о запрещенных веществах могут нарушать закон. Все необходимо зацензурить, таковы правила. Кекс и компотики теперь в тренде))
😁15🔥1
Поздравляем женскую половину нашего канала с праздником ❤️❤️❤️
🔥13👍5
Фанаты продвинут тебя лучше рекламы!
🔥6
Продвижение музыки в 2026: что происходит сейчас? Привет! Скажу прямо, сегодня правила игры на музыкальном рынке изменились до неузнаваемости. Выпустить трек теперь может кто угодно) Пара запросов в правильную нейросеть, и готов хит с потрясающим вокалом и мощным сведением. Стриминговые площадки просто тонут в тысячах таких релизов каждый день! 🥳 Как пробить этот бесконечный поток пластикового контента? Забудь про …
🔥12
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @lampmusic_tg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Применяешь ИИ в творчестве/работе?
The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Если телегу заблокируют, останешься тут?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
А видосы под свои треки в ИИ делаешь?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Как ты относишься к нейротрекам?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 January 2026 to 30 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ламповый Media - то, что нужно музыканту” (@lampmusic_tg), 2,371 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lampmusic_tg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.